From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
joel@joelfernandes.org, linke li <lilinke99@qq.com>,
Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] tracing/ring-buffer: Fix wakeup of ring buffer waiters
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 13:39:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=whaVBe14mbW4QWNuywBP_ZvGJYRZ3dbgx9-ebSxnNTXiQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240308163528.3980c639@gandalf.local.home>
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 13:33, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>
> There's two layers:
>
> 1) the ring buffer has the above simple producer / consumer.
> Where the wake ups can happen at the point of where the buffer has
> the amount filled that the consumer wants to start consuming with.
>
> 2) The tracing layer; Here on close of a file, the consumers need to be
> woken up and not wait again. And just take whatever was there to finish
> reading.
>
> There's also another case that the ioctl() just kicks the current
> readers out, but doesn't care about new readers.
But that's the beauty of just using the wait_event() model.
Just add that "exit" condition to the condition.
So the above "complexity" is *literally* just changing the
(new = atomic_read_acquire(&my->seq)) != old
condition to
should_exit ||
(new = atomic_read_acquire(&my->seq)) != old
(replace "should_exit" with whatever that condition is, of course) and
the wait_event() logic will take care of the rest.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-08 21:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-08 18:38 [PATCH 0/6] tracing/ring-buffer: Fix wakeup of ring buffer waiters Steven Rostedt
2024-03-08 18:38 ` [PATCH 1/6] ring-buffer: Fix waking up ring buffer readers Steven Rostedt
2024-03-08 18:38 ` [PATCH 2/6] ring-buffer: Fix resetting of shortest_full Steven Rostedt
2024-03-08 18:38 ` [PATCH 3/6] tracing: Use .flush() call to wake up readers Steven Rostedt
2024-03-08 18:38 ` [PATCH 4/6] tracing: Fix waking up tracing readers Steven Rostedt
2024-03-08 19:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-03-08 18:38 ` [PATCH 5/6] ring-buffer: Restructure ring_buffer_wait() to prepare for updates Steven Rostedt
2024-03-08 18:38 ` [PATCH 6/6] tracing/ring-buffer: Fix wait_on_pipe() race Steven Rostedt
2024-03-08 20:39 ` [PATCH 0/6] tracing/ring-buffer: Fix wakeup of ring buffer waiters Linus Torvalds
2024-03-08 21:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-03-08 21:39 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2024-03-08 21:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-03-10 16:19 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHk-=whaVBe14mbW4QWNuywBP_ZvGJYRZ3dbgx9-ebSxnNTXiQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=lilinke99@qq.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=rabin@rab.in \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).