From: "Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: "Naveen N Rao" <naveen@kernel.org>,
<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
"Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
"Masahiro Yamada" <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>, "Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 04/11] powerpc/ftrace: Remove pointer to struct module from dyn_arch_ftrace
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2024 19:27:55 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D2E3GNRTRCOF.16TWBZIA5EZS2@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f13b5e0cb4f9961f23c8880a2f98073e41f695d8.1718908016.git.naveen@kernel.org>
On Fri Jun 21, 2024 at 4:54 AM AEST, Naveen N Rao wrote:
> Pointer to struct module is only relevant for ftrace records belonging
> to kernel modules. Having this field in dyn_arch_ftrace wastes memory
> for all ftrace records belonging to the kernel. Remove the same in
> favour of looking up the module from the ftrace record address, similar
> to other architectures.
arm is the only one left that requires dyn_arch_ftrace after this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h | 1 -
> arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 54 +++++++++++-------
> arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_64_pg.c | 73 +++++++++++-------------
> 3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
>
[snip]
> @@ -106,28 +106,48 @@ static unsigned long find_ftrace_tramp(unsigned long ip)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
> +static unsigned long ftrace_lookup_module_stub(unsigned long ip, unsigned long addr)
> +{
> + struct module *mod = NULL;
> +
> + /*
> + * NOTE: __module_text_address() must be called with preemption
> + * disabled, but we can rely on ftrace_lock to ensure that 'mod'
> + * retains its validity throughout the remainder of this code.
> + */
> + preempt_disable();
> + mod = __module_text_address(ip);
> + preempt_enable();
If 'mod' was guaranteed to exist before your patch, then it
should do afterward too. But is it always ftrace_lock that
protects it, or do dyn_ftrace entries pin a module in some
cases?
> @@ -555,7 +551,10 @@ __ftrace_modify_call(struct dyn_ftrace *rec, unsigned long old_addr,
> ppc_inst_t op;
> unsigned long ip = rec->ip;
> unsigned long entry, ptr, tramp;
> - struct module *mod = rec->arch.mod;
> + struct module *mod = ftrace_lookup_module(rec);
> +
> + if (!mod)
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> /* If we never set up ftrace trampolines, then bail */
> if (!mod->arch.tramp || !mod->arch.tramp_regs) {
> @@ -668,14 +667,6 @@ int ftrace_modify_call(struct dyn_ftrace *rec, unsigned long old_addr,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * Out of range jumps are called from modules.
> - */
> - if (!rec->arch.mod) {
> - pr_err("No module loaded\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
A couple of these conversions are not _exactly_ the same (lost
the pr_err here), maybe that's deliberate because the messages
don't look too useful.
Looks okay though
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-01 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-20 18:54 [RFC PATCH v3 00/11] powerpc: Add support for ftrace direct and BPF trampolines Naveen N Rao
2024-06-20 18:54 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/11] powerpc/kprobes: Use ftrace to determine if a probe is at function entry Naveen N Rao
2024-07-01 8:40 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-07-01 18:18 ` Naveen N Rao
2024-06-20 18:54 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/11] powerpc/ftrace: Unify 32-bit and 64-bit ftrace entry code Naveen N Rao
2024-07-01 8:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-07-01 18:34 ` Naveen N Rao
2024-06-20 18:54 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/11] powerpc/module_64: Convert #ifdef to IS_ENABLED() Naveen N Rao
2024-07-01 9:01 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-20 18:54 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/11] powerpc/ftrace: Remove pointer to struct module from dyn_arch_ftrace Naveen N Rao
2024-07-01 9:27 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2024-07-01 18:51 ` Naveen N Rao
2024-06-20 18:54 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/11] kbuild: Add generic hook for architectures to use before the final vmlinux link Naveen N Rao
2024-07-01 9:30 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-20 18:54 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/11] powerpc64/ftrace: Move ftrace sequence out of line Naveen N Rao
2024-07-01 10:39 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-07-01 19:44 ` Naveen N Rao
2024-06-20 18:54 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/11] powerpc/ftrace: Add support for DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_CALL_OPS Naveen N Rao
2024-06-20 18:54 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/11] powerpc/ftrace: Add support for DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS Naveen N Rao
2024-06-20 18:54 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/11] samples/ftrace: Add support for ftrace direct samples on powerpc Naveen N Rao
2024-06-20 19:09 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/11] powerpc64/bpf: Fold bpf_jit_emit_func_call_hlp() into bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel() Naveen N Rao
2024-06-20 19:09 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/11] powerpc64/bpf: Add support for bpf trampolines Naveen N Rao
2024-07-01 11:03 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-07-01 19:58 ` Naveen N Rao
2024-06-24 11:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 00/11] powerpc: Add support for ftrace direct and BPF trampolines Vishal Chourasia
2024-07-03 11:11 ` Vishal Chourasia
2024-07-14 7:52 ` Naveen N Rao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D2E3GNRTRCOF.16TWBZIA5EZS2@gmail.com \
--to=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=naveen@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).