From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=209.85.210.172 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792635743; b=YDk3IGs2xLn6SDisgDRm2dEVAZqlCvylIcK6NtoYemv+p0wV2YVxqd3ceh559H/Djmw6 tQO2wAeRHgRuU41kzbrTw54ShIXLWJDrGED9+x4ozpVzm09FaGR2ZHRiGzyTPHjsjTOC8 Or3I5EZ/ySlT/OFEUrndlaMSVAlMH9mhlhdrBfrbtLVXHKkq6BZfcYMyASndYeg2JJoyU x99n3TPtarGXPbTgVdWg3lHnrCqMJd5DdUQ6edKy1f8iflpDEZdbM3ksWyBZzV/zfSYvh oKivt4wT414cC4XP1OP1fenBBY1Vmtg8uHJrwZ9tKnR5OveXhmd8CEIEJ5ReKD6qjJw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792635743; h=DMARC-Filter:Received:DKIM-Signature:X-Google-DKIM-Signature: X-Forwarded-Encrypted:X-Gm-Message-State:X-Gm-Gg:X-Received:Received: Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To: References:X-Mailer:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=XxjX1g1mQUEUPhKLrpLxYSgZ8S+x7GSgwLX7BwyjX7g=; b=de+DbEBolCXlk0TnJuRIv/PA4wzEkWpd6LMv+sgA0IoaRowqMHXyp9QGq/FpDbLmZNXC kZAWZojvNKDFErfNGZyFiR2BHTazncaiA3CgZWvhkDA7M7FGNVQ/fpZnxY/at0c34PiKx AOsvJmYYtAelur3NhYEMQkza6RhatPLbzaVC9VKy1QTuERrNPO0fqb2lJ5rbvWpcp4ty0 2IOWZQ3vapxo71eiu+l+oFrVovMf5d2FButDQVb2E0OD6Clbao7R0Knb+h7olphrvY28b d5N37TwgBxKUBoKq7IKsMhAsOUD2DOVN6UU2aCdAsMy6oNLhKQQBfLVFxixolzDW9sQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20251104 header.b=sS0MesHX; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=209.85.210.172 Received: from mail-pf1-f172.google.com (mail-pf1-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01A62606A31B for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2026 02:22:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 01A62606A31B Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20251104 header.b=sS0MesHX Received: by mail-pf1-f172.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-8a06b436dffso569155b3a.3 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 19:22:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1792635742; x=1793240542; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:references:in-reply-to:cc:to :from:subject:message-id:date:content-type:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=XxjX1g1mQUEUPhKLrpLxYSgZ8S+x7GSgwLX7BwyjX7g=; b=sS0MesHX2nvWA2URY0k8Cne+sfJOI5PDPY0/f9zuTS95LHs/n/U9E8Pa4fzDUDcan+ Y9rcsec7bezD6Guv7ewLXhN25+qbv8/QYe+Nt37G/XwT4gtFsAw4dBx/scmdeSeprx8F yyYmOQOxj61oR9X1k4gckGNgfuwxjCdGgyxCQFj1M4GVJ4knVIsYp4O+Vpxpl2Ncu06y c78So+Vegffz8XffqmKkG/C++ukW6P3hjj0QtBPdRBMEZ3yxU/7oayY14RY5Y/KYxQ1q zYqw5lr40dCQEe9v04A1K2soetRjLIKPH5jCosRLRnOIYPu5etD6U75ESDrikvZjJQvJ nS8Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20260707; t=1792635742; x=1793240542; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:references:in-reply-to:cc:to :from:subject:message-id:date:content-type:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=XxjX1g1mQUEUPhKLrpLxYSgZ8S+x7GSgwLX7BwyjX7g=; b=DcDPTQgs2yVbj+yMEieFH4fEEgcZpGyRSlAAR7txePFuNTYpcEtcHXtiShIMk6oLaa MFZEQifl2c42MDSsBqZMneIPS8wiO4B7K+lleaBJXQent9vnrrada5fGrIZyWN30inpV A7cJ/NnL3m/KfGonEY4eFpO4Nt5rVaf17zQAkmnHHn9giNYx54FTM+s0O19U1jK+8IDW IfbyroXYk2iqva3t2VUfwypvqXKIS9J+nKmNAyGRh+fzA+N8VUPAPdExybgU07AcTXdU 9yF221ysY2DeY09zO7185uTNZVceFqdOHVcz6ORLVwLkg/5UimdQMlEDQt9H3CuHuzLH m14g== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AKwUvBx40ZkcaI6BVUlnfRzceBK7O5rW+HueN3NBcL5AlB9ua+2zlDBwoUjdoqHVs5IZrwwfdWenNutzORweotZseIoJHUs=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AFq9FYKuh/JDbsj9uqeog5nChWgm9KlG6P784vI0eTz3bo5jztpzW5GI syunNRQSF/AqXJXYUEi/dwA1WlkLzzFv/7iDtrXpqwWnvZoOczMLy1xV X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou087tThxxKZAEoo6gG39YG1KlO44ZhoskRv6YkmFn1Jm4zaN+nWIYCHE6KajsD noIBCq4j9SNVnjXxwC+XvylF+72BvjpF3YJ9KbyXHOzfvTb7CknWSdEVrgrRsvIxb5Jmz3ajuF7 yvFBalbVvkvG7p6TQuI+9ZU1rJAf9ZmCEUvz4J9Asm929YDl22F71om637BmlCRvkRE5jh1gfFx QTe03D/elXnGKxXjMWRG79XLTKcwu6FDeF4yDRgqKHTaeR7tPFR4j+/4ajcLXsAuXX8mkR2gFim fW17A0qgnHC2UTM/S3SaI/pDj8Im+bPj1x9ITEsR/xxWt1kfDN92Jfv40XjOL5avWVTj+4zHRkK RsSs2S+8+4SdrOjpbR98NcYMLHcKGuSSqLA2XoJQ9c4b6DyitujU0/scSvKs+yhJ0iRJnEtucT1 7+ydehFc94vgc3O8rH6HJyg3akWd002dHwl2ZqkxnMu942oCmZ34KBPuAdpHNo+VjhksVliuG06 acG3JsYwrIu0PZWcrQWK7OblbdZPrNFKnxh3qNApULsbh5gOOQhfVEAtbzVHhav8LHdRszBeVVh ldkwhfotZTdkbu2rugTyI4BjkaDRb/EFXIlpGeZFWIwb3rR0JerQxhEaj+Jm X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:b49:b0:89f:37a0:b2cb with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-8a089eba62amr2905819b3a.49.1792635742236; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 19:22:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([153.61.198.248]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-8a0894b4206sm1450303b3a.18.2026.10.21.19.22.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Oct 2026 19:22:21 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 02:22:20 +0000 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 9/9] selftests/bpf: Test uprobes and fork() with busy mmap_lock From: "Alexei Starovoitov" To: , Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , In-Reply-To: References: <20261022015712.1297331-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> <20261022015712.1297331-10-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> X-Mailer: mkdraft (claude review draft; edit before sending) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 On Wed, Oct 21, 2026 at 07:10 PM sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote: >> +#define AREA_MAX (64UL << 30) > > [ ... ] > >> + area = mmap(NULL, AREA_MAX, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_NORESERVE, -1, 0); >> + if (area == MAP_FAILED) >> + goto err; > > [Severity: Medium] > In tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_busy_mm.c, does AREA_MAX > overflow on 32-bit architectures when passed to mmap() in hold_mmap_lock()? > > Should AREA_MAX be sized appropriately for 32-bit architectures as well? No. uprobe_multi link is 64-bit only. bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach() returns -EOPNOTSUPP on 32-bit and three of four subtests attach with it.