From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Nikola Grcevski <nikola.grcevski@grafana.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf: Refactor bpf_tracing_func_proto() and remove bpf_get_probe_write_proto()
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 12:49:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z0cHRzM3NDwhLPTE@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241127111020.1738105-2-elver@google.com>
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 12:10:01PM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> With bpf_get_probe_write_proto() no longer printing a message, we can
> avoid it being a special case with its own permission check.
>
> Refactor bpf_tracing_func_proto() similar to bpf_base_func_proto() to
> have a section conditional on bpf_token_capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN), where
> the proto for bpf_probe_write_user() is returned. Finally, remove the
> unnecessary bpf_get_probe_write_proto().
>
> This simplifies the code, and adding additional CAP_SYS_ADMIN-only
> helpers in future avoids duplicating the same CAP_SYS_ADMIN check.
>
> Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> ---
> v2:
> * New patch.
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
jirka
> ---
> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> index 0ab56af2e298..d312b77993dc 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> @@ -357,14 +357,6 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_probe_write_user_proto = {
> .arg3_type = ARG_CONST_SIZE,
> };
>
> -static const struct bpf_func_proto *bpf_get_probe_write_proto(void)
> -{
> - if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> - return NULL;
> -
> - return &bpf_probe_write_user_proto;
> -}
> -
> #define MAX_TRACE_PRINTK_VARARGS 3
> #define BPF_TRACE_PRINTK_SIZE 1024
>
> @@ -1417,6 +1409,12 @@ late_initcall(bpf_key_sig_kfuncs_init);
> static const struct bpf_func_proto *
> bpf_tracing_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
> {
> + const struct bpf_func_proto *func_proto;
> +
> + func_proto = bpf_base_func_proto(func_id, prog);
> + if (func_proto)
> + return func_proto;
> +
> switch (func_id) {
> case BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem:
> return &bpf_map_lookup_elem_proto;
> @@ -1458,9 +1456,6 @@ bpf_tracing_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
> return &bpf_perf_event_read_proto;
> case BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32:
> return &bpf_get_prandom_u32_proto;
> - case BPF_FUNC_probe_write_user:
> - return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_WRITE_USER) < 0 ?
> - NULL : bpf_get_probe_write_proto();
> case BPF_FUNC_probe_read_user:
> return &bpf_probe_read_user_proto;
> case BPF_FUNC_probe_read_kernel:
> @@ -1539,7 +1534,18 @@ bpf_tracing_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
> case BPF_FUNC_trace_vprintk:
> return bpf_get_trace_vprintk_proto();
> default:
> - return bpf_base_func_proto(func_id, prog);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (!bpf_token_capable(prog->aux->token, CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + switch (func_id) {
> + case BPF_FUNC_probe_write_user:
> + return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_WRITE_USER) < 0 ?
> + NULL : &bpf_probe_write_user_proto;
> + default:
> + return NULL;
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.47.0.338.g60cca15819-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-27 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-27 11:10 [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: Remove bpf_probe_write_user() warning message Marco Elver
2024-11-27 11:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf: Refactor bpf_tracing_func_proto() and remove bpf_get_probe_write_proto() Marco Elver
2024-11-27 11:49 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2024-11-27 12:06 ` Marco Elver
2024-11-27 12:11 ` Daniel Borkmann
2024-11-27 11:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: Remove bpf_probe_write_user() warning message Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z0cHRzM3NDwhLPTE@krava \
--to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=nikola.grcevski@grafana.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).