From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1E05271265; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 19:11:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739905879; cv=none; b=JWnuHVqEQ+JQpdgA6u67kvjqFlomSks09oJ+p8O1StDTj5aWh9izE+yXDdi5vlqTuvcqdVpmZJ+WXheMoEfeqw6tUV+JGgrY6/OocaplLb9ZEUW3laNfMWH3/eb96eZFk9DHngslHrBjKTejQA6/BoCQehkFVCXMcyf343d/2Bc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739905879; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HAhbVYY0BFTrXeNHjiE12Hv0whhqsPdEA7Z/cepHjdI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=BIP5Ighbnk/a8kPH5R59Cm7O2QgMkNW4/YcdFYphZRPTJtI5J0wbCYrnw9YBaK7mXadyqhGB6tba+2v6joaARa0Ual2Nlx65BejyZ7mFNmcZApraO2QwfoehlduNO3gsarUz/Xp0if5cjJZ7W7tAH5sljUeXGY234p4FCp9UcNU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=HSGZJa4v; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="HSGZJa4v" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C95CAC4CEE2; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 19:11:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1739905876; bh=HAhbVYY0BFTrXeNHjiE12Hv0whhqsPdEA7Z/cepHjdI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=HSGZJa4vmZo8KPPtt7ObQktcqNcxi/x/SlIp3NJC2JkgA2dKYg4o3yKvykS28TJ15 CB4z3E2c616rmn1e+KNqe+srNCiDHJlxjOpCLD59DK0B1BnofPoT89A1AL8QXSPecU nnM295/8jhdbBvNPVxKg0Qmds9c+zHQLj+YV87ZPis3ChtApnLQPXkYsGrIYwHZ/Bq dbVdfzzbNY3eybrLBEtzEahE2nKu8mLg5fJASUXCMtHP1Rj7lCN/lFa4Qw6kHrEm/M JI4s31DmT5LIY4o0hLHat6Z+MAIuKIt5PIXnT+ZHnE+Je04QyTUeZSSuFu44k2jvwZ rAnFrsTwJVRbQ== Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 20:11:13 +0100 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Andrii Nakryiko Cc: Charlie Jenkins , Alexei Starovoitov , Namhyung Kim , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Eduard Zingerman , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Ian Rogers , Adrian Hunter , Quentin Monnet , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Daniel Lezcano , Zhang Rui , Lukasz Luba , Josh Poimboeuf , Mykola Lysenko , Shuah Khan , Jiri Kosina , Benjamin Tissoires , Steven Rostedt , bpf , LKML , "linux-perf-use." , Linux Power Management , "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , "open list:HID CORE LAYER" , linux-trace-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] tools: Unify top-level quiet infrastructure Message-ID: References: <20250203-quiet_tools-v1-0-d25c8956e59a@rivosinc.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 07:39:44PM +0100, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 04:23:49PM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 10:31 AM Charlie Jenkins wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 05:28:19PM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 3:24 PM Charlie Jenkins wrote: > > > > So, can you please check and fix? > > > I think I am misunderstanding what you are saying. The patch that we are > > > discussing on is the patch to fix this? You are showing the output from > > > the patch that is being fixed in this series. > > Ah, it's me getting confused. It was the earlier perf commit that > > broke all this, makes sense. I just double-checked with your patches > > applied locally. It indeed fixes the issue, LGTM. > > Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko > Thanks, b4 didn't pick this one, probably because you provided the Ack > for a previous version of this series, but the patch in it is the same > as in v2, so I'm keeping it, ok? > Also since you applied the patches and tested it, can I promote the tag > to Tested-by you? > Humm, there is a slight difference, checking that in the e-mails > thread... > + quiet = quiet_ > + Q = @ > > The above doesn´t have spaces surrounding the = sign, lemme see... Got it, the comment about consistency, etc. Can I use the Tested-by: for the v3 series? - Arnaldo