From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@meta.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>,
Jackie Liu <liu.yun@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] ftrace: Show all functions with addresses in available_filter_functions_addrs
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 22:25:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZId/UL/iujOdgel+@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230612110222.50c254f3@gandalf.local.home>
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 11:02:22AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 07:49:53 -0700
> Yonghong Song <yhs@meta.com> wrote:
>
> > I am actually interested in how available_filter_functions_addrs
> > will be used. For example, bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts()
> > can already take addresses from kallsyms. How to use
> > available_filter_functions_addrs to facilitate kprobe_multi?
the problem is that we need to do 2 passes:
- through available_filter_functions and find out if the function is traceable
- through /proc/kallsyms to get the address for traceable function
having available_filter_functions symbols together with addresses allow
us to skip the kallsyms step
and we are ok with the address in available_filter_functions_addr not being the
function entry, because kprobe_multi uses fprobe and that handles both entry and
patch-site address properly
> > Do we need to change kernel APIs? It would be great at least we
> > got a RFC patch to answer these questions.
>
> I agree, having that information would also be useful to me.
>
> Jiri? Andrii?
so we have 2 interfaces how to create kprobe_multi link:
a) passing symbols to kernel
1) user gathers symbols and need to ensure that they are
trace-able -> pass through available_filter_functions file
2) kernel takes those symbols and translates them to addresses
through kallsyms api
3) addresses are passed to fprobe/ftrace through:
register_fprobe_ips
-> ftrace_set_filter_ips
b) passing addresses to kernel
1) user gathers symbols and needs to ensure that they are
trace-able -> pass through available_filter_functions file
2) user takes those symbols and translates them to addresses
through /proc/kallsyms
3) addresses are passed to the kernel and kernel calls:
register_fprobe_ips
-> ftrace_set_filter_ips
The new available_filter_functions_addrs file helps us with option b),
because we can make 'b 1' and 'b 2' in one step - while filtering traceable
functions, we get the address directly.
I tested the new available_filter_functions_addrs changes with some hacked
selftest changes, you can check it in here [1].
I assume Jackie Liu will send new version of her patchset [2] based on this
new available_filter_functions_addrs file.
I think we should have these changes coming together and add some perf
measurements from before and after to make the benefit apparent.
jirka
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jolsa/perf.git/commit/?h=bpf/avail_addrs&id=fecaeeaf40bae034715ab2e9a46ca1dc16371e8e
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230526155026.1419390-1-liu.yun@linux.dev/#r
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-12 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-11 13:00 [PATCHv2] ftrace: Show all functions with addresses in available_filter_functions_addrs Jiri Olsa
2023-06-12 0:22 ` Yonghong Song
2023-06-12 2:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-06-12 2:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-06-12 14:49 ` Yonghong Song
2023-06-12 15:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-06-12 20:25 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2023-06-12 23:28 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-12 23:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-06-13 1:22 ` Jackie Liu
2023-06-13 5:04 ` Yonghong Song
2023-06-13 13:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-06-13 13:44 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-06-14 14:14 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-06-14 15:12 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZId/UL/iujOdgel+@krava \
--to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liu.yun@linux.dev \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=yhs@meta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).