From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/34] function_graph: Allow multiple users to attach to function graph
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 14:23:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZYGZWWqwtSP82Sja@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <170290516454.220107.14775763404510245361.stgit@devnote2>
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 10:12:45PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
SNIP
> /* Both enabled by default (can be cleared by function_graph tracer flags */
> static bool fgraph_sleep_time = true;
>
> @@ -126,9 +247,34 @@ ftrace_push_return_trace(unsigned long ret, unsigned long func,
> calltime = trace_clock_local();
>
> index = current->curr_ret_stack;
> - RET_STACK_INC(current->curr_ret_stack);
> + /* ret offset = 1 ; type = reserved */
> + current->ret_stack[index + FGRAPH_RET_INDEX] = 1;
> ret_stack = RET_STACK(current, index);
> + ret_stack->ret = ret;
> + /*
> + * The unwinders expect curr_ret_stack to point to either zero
> + * or an index where to find the next ret_stack. Even though the
> + * ret stack might be bogus, we want to write the ret and the
> + * index to find the ret_stack before we increment the stack point.
> + * If an interrupt comes in now before we increment the curr_ret_stack
> + * it may blow away what we wrote. But that's fine, because the
> + * index will still be correct (even though the 'ret' won't be).
> + * What we worry about is the index being correct after we increment
> + * the curr_ret_stack and before we update that index, as if an
> + * interrupt comes in and does an unwind stack dump, it will need
> + * at least a correct index!
> + */
> barrier();
> + current->curr_ret_stack += FGRAPH_RET_INDEX + 1;
> + /*
> + * This next barrier is to ensure that an interrupt coming in
> + * will not corrupt what we are about to write.
> + */
> + barrier();
> +
> + /* Still keep it reserved even if an interrupt came in */
> + current->ret_stack[index + FGRAPH_RET_INDEX] = 1;
seems like this was set already few lines above?
jirka
> +
> ret_stack->ret = ret;
> ret_stack->func = func;
> ret_stack->calltime = calltime;
> @@ -159,6 +305,12 @@ int function_graph_enter(unsigned long ret, unsigned long func,
> unsigned long frame_pointer, unsigned long *retp)
> {
> struct ftrace_graph_ent trace;
> + int offset;
> + int start;
> + int type;
> + int val;
> + int cnt = 0;
> + int i;
>
> #ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
> /*
SNIP
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-19 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-18 13:11 [PATCH v5 00/34] tracing: fprobe: function_graph: Multi-function graph and fprobe on fgraph Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-18 13:11 ` [PATCH v5 01/34] tracing: Add a comment about ftrace_regs definition Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2024-01-05 17:12 ` Mark Rutland
2023-12-18 13:11 ` [PATCH v5 02/34] x86: tracing: Add ftrace_regs definition in the header Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-18 13:12 ` [PATCH v5 03/34] function_graph: Convert ret_stack to a series of longs Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-18 13:12 ` [PATCH v5 04/34] fgraph: Use BUILD_BUG_ON() to make sure we have structures divisible by long Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-18 13:12 ` [PATCH v5 05/34] function_graph: Add an array structure that will allow multiple callbacks Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-18 13:12 ` [PATCH v5 06/34] function_graph: Allow multiple users to attach to function graph Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-19 13:23 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2023-12-19 15:45 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-12-26 15:24 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-12-18 13:12 ` [PATCH v5 07/34] function_graph: Remove logic around ftrace_graph_entry and return Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-18 13:13 ` [PATCH v5 08/34] ftrace/function_graph: Pass fgraph_ops to function graph callbacks Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-18 13:13 ` [PATCH v5 09/34] ftrace: Allow function_graph tracer to be enabled in instances Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-18 13:13 ` [PATCH v5 10/34] ftrace: Allow ftrace startup flags exist without dynamic ftrace Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-18 13:13 ` [PATCH v5 11/34] function_graph: Have the instances use their own ftrace_ops for filtering Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-26 0:20 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-01-05 17:09 ` Mark Rutland
2024-01-08 1:14 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-01-08 12:25 ` Mark Rutland
2024-01-08 14:21 ` Mark Rutland
2024-01-08 15:03 ` Mark Rutland
2024-01-11 13:47 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-01-11 2:15 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-01-11 11:01 ` Mark Rutland
2024-01-11 13:45 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-12-18 13:13 ` [PATCH v5 12/34] function_graph: Use a simple LRU for fgraph_array index number Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-18 13:14 ` [PATCH v5 13/34] function_graph: Add "task variables" per task for fgraph_ops Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-18 13:14 ` [PATCH v5 14/34] function_graph: Move set_graph_function tests to shadow stack global var Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-18 13:14 ` [PATCH v5 15/34] function_graph: Move graph depth stored data " Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-18 13:14 ` [PATCH v5 16/34] function_graph: Move graph notrace bit " Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-18 13:15 ` [PATCH v5 17/34] function_graph: Implement fgraph_reserve_data() and fgraph_retrieve_data() Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-18 13:15 ` [PATCH v5 18/34] function_graph: Add selftest for passing local variables Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-18 13:15 ` [PATCH v5 19/34] function_graph: Add a new entry handler with parent_ip and ftrace_regs Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-18 13:15 ` [PATCH v5 20/34] function_graph: Add a new exit " Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-18 13:15 ` [PATCH v5 21/34] x86/ftrace: Enable HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FREGS Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-18 13:15 ` [PATCH v5 22/34] tracing: Rename ftrace_regs_return_value to ftrace_regs_get_return_value Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2024-01-05 17:14 ` Mark Rutland
2024-01-08 1:09 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-12-18 13:16 ` [PATCH v5 23/34] arm64: ftrace: Enable HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FREGS Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-18 13:16 ` [PATCH v5 24/34] fprobe: Use ftrace_regs in fprobe entry handler Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-19 13:23 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-12-19 13:23 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-12-19 22:51 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-12-18 13:16 ` [PATCH v5 25/34] fprobe: Use ftrace_regs in fprobe exit handler Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-18 13:16 ` [PATCH v5 26/34] tracing: Add ftrace_partial_regs() for converting ftrace_regs to pt_regs Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-18 13:16 ` [PATCH v5 27/34] tracing: Add ftrace_fill_perf_regs() for perf event Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 28/34] fprobe: Rewrite fprobe on function-graph tracer Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-19 14:39 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-12-20 1:00 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-12-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 29/34] tracing/fprobe: Remove nr_maxactive from fprobe Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 30/34] tracing/fprobe: Enable fprobe events with CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 31/34] bpf: Enable kprobe_multi feature if CONFIG_FPROBE is enabled Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v5 32/34] selftests: ftrace: Remove obsolate maxactive syntax check Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-18 13:18 ` [PATCH v5 33/34] selftests/ftrace: Add a test case for repeating register/unregister fprobe Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-12-18 13:18 ` [PATCH v5 34/34] Documentation: probes: Update fprobe on function-graph tracer Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZYGZWWqwtSP82Sja@krava \
--to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=revest@chromium.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).