linux-trace-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH RESEND] bootconfig: use memblock_free_late to free xbc memory to buddy
@ 2024-04-12  2:41 qiang4.zhang
  2024-04-12  7:34 ` Masami Hiramatsu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: qiang4.zhang @ 2024-04-12  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Masami Hiramatsu, Andrew Morton
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, Qiang Zhang, Stable

From: Qiang Zhang <qiang4.zhang@intel.com>

On the time to free xbc memory, memblock has handed over memory to buddy
allocator. So it doesn't make sense to free memory back to memblock.
memblock_free() called by xbc_exit() even causes UAF bugs on architectures
with CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK disabled like x86. Following KASAN logs
shows this case.

[    9.410890] ==================================================================
[    9.418962] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in memblock_isolate_range+0x12d/0x260
[    9.426850] Read of size 8 at addr ffff88845dd30000 by task swapper/0/1

[    9.435901] CPU: 9 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G     U             6.9.0-rc3-00208-g586b5dfb51b9 #5
[    9.446403] Hardware name: Intel Corporation RPLP LP5 (CPU:RaptorLake)/RPLP LP5 (ID:13), BIOS IRPPN02.01.01.00.00.19.015.D-00000000 Dec 28 2023
[    9.460789] Call Trace:
[    9.463518]  <TASK>
[    9.465859]  dump_stack_lvl+0x53/0x70
[    9.469949]  print_report+0xce/0x610
[    9.473944]  ? __virt_addr_valid+0xf5/0x1b0
[    9.478619]  ? memblock_isolate_range+0x12d/0x260
[    9.483877]  kasan_report+0xc6/0x100
[    9.487870]  ? memblock_isolate_range+0x12d/0x260
[    9.493125]  memblock_isolate_range+0x12d/0x260
[    9.498187]  memblock_phys_free+0xb4/0x160
[    9.502762]  ? __pfx_memblock_phys_free+0x10/0x10
[    9.508021]  ? mutex_unlock+0x7e/0xd0
[    9.512111]  ? __pfx_mutex_unlock+0x10/0x10
[    9.516786]  ? kernel_init_freeable+0x2d4/0x430
[    9.521850]  ? __pfx_kernel_init+0x10/0x10
[    9.526426]  xbc_exit+0x17/0x70
[    9.529935]  kernel_init+0x38/0x1e0
[    9.533829]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0xd/0x30
[    9.538601]  ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50
[    9.542596]  ? __pfx_kernel_init+0x10/0x10
[    9.547170]  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[    9.551552]  </TASK>

[    9.555649] The buggy address belongs to the physical page:
[    9.561875] page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x1 pfn:0x45dd30
[    9.570821] flags: 0x200000000000000(node=0|zone=2)
[    9.576271] page_type: 0xffffffff()
[    9.580167] raw: 0200000000000000 ffffea0011774c48 ffffea0012ba1848 0000000000000000
[    9.588823] raw: 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000
[    9.597476] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected

[    9.605362] Memory state around the buggy address:
[    9.610714]  ffff88845dd2ff00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
[    9.618786]  ffff88845dd2ff80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
[    9.626857] >ffff88845dd30000: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
[    9.634930]                    ^
[    9.638534]  ffff88845dd30080: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
[    9.646605]  ffff88845dd30100: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
[    9.654675] ==================================================================

Cc: Stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Qiang Zhang <qiang4.zhang@intel.com>
---
 lib/bootconfig.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/bootconfig.c b/lib/bootconfig.c
index c59d26068a64..4524ee944df0 100644
--- a/lib/bootconfig.c
+++ b/lib/bootconfig.c
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static inline void * __init xbc_alloc_mem(size_t size)
 
 static inline void __init xbc_free_mem(void *addr, size_t size)
 {
-	memblock_free(addr, size);
+	memblock_free_late(__pa(addr), size);
 }
 
 #else /* !__KERNEL__ */
-- 
2.39.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH RESEND] bootconfig: use memblock_free_late to free xbc memory to buddy
  2024-04-12  2:41 [PATCH RESEND] bootconfig: use memblock_free_late to free xbc memory to buddy qiang4.zhang
@ 2024-04-12  7:34 ` Masami Hiramatsu
  2024-04-12  9:29   ` Qiang Zhang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Masami Hiramatsu @ 2024-04-12  7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qiang4.zhang
  Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, Qiang Zhang,
	Stable

On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 10:41:04 +0800
qiang4.zhang@linux.intel.com wrote:

> From: Qiang Zhang <qiang4.zhang@intel.com>
> 
> On the time to free xbc memory, memblock has handed over memory to buddy
> allocator. So it doesn't make sense to free memory back to memblock.
> memblock_free() called by xbc_exit() even causes UAF bugs on architectures
> with CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK disabled like x86. Following KASAN logs
> shows this case.
> 
> [    9.410890] ==================================================================
> [    9.418962] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in memblock_isolate_range+0x12d/0x260
> [    9.426850] Read of size 8 at addr ffff88845dd30000 by task swapper/0/1
> 
> [    9.435901] CPU: 9 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G     U             6.9.0-rc3-00208-g586b5dfb51b9 #5
> [    9.446403] Hardware name: Intel Corporation RPLP LP5 (CPU:RaptorLake)/RPLP LP5 (ID:13), BIOS IRPPN02.01.01.00.00.19.015.D-00000000 Dec 28 2023
> [    9.460789] Call Trace:
> [    9.463518]  <TASK>
> [    9.465859]  dump_stack_lvl+0x53/0x70
> [    9.469949]  print_report+0xce/0x610
> [    9.473944]  ? __virt_addr_valid+0xf5/0x1b0
> [    9.478619]  ? memblock_isolate_range+0x12d/0x260
> [    9.483877]  kasan_report+0xc6/0x100
> [    9.487870]  ? memblock_isolate_range+0x12d/0x260
> [    9.493125]  memblock_isolate_range+0x12d/0x260
> [    9.498187]  memblock_phys_free+0xb4/0x160
> [    9.502762]  ? __pfx_memblock_phys_free+0x10/0x10
> [    9.508021]  ? mutex_unlock+0x7e/0xd0
> [    9.512111]  ? __pfx_mutex_unlock+0x10/0x10
> [    9.516786]  ? kernel_init_freeable+0x2d4/0x430
> [    9.521850]  ? __pfx_kernel_init+0x10/0x10
> [    9.526426]  xbc_exit+0x17/0x70
> [    9.529935]  kernel_init+0x38/0x1e0
> [    9.533829]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0xd/0x30
> [    9.538601]  ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50
> [    9.542596]  ? __pfx_kernel_init+0x10/0x10
> [    9.547170]  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
> [    9.551552]  </TASK>
> 
> [    9.555649] The buggy address belongs to the physical page:
> [    9.561875] page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x1 pfn:0x45dd30
> [    9.570821] flags: 0x200000000000000(node=0|zone=2)
> [    9.576271] page_type: 0xffffffff()
> [    9.580167] raw: 0200000000000000 ffffea0011774c48 ffffea0012ba1848 0000000000000000
> [    9.588823] raw: 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000
> [    9.597476] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
> 
> [    9.605362] Memory state around the buggy address:
> [    9.610714]  ffff88845dd2ff00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> [    9.618786]  ffff88845dd2ff80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> [    9.626857] >ffff88845dd30000: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> [    9.634930]                    ^
> [    9.638534]  ffff88845dd30080: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> [    9.646605]  ffff88845dd30100: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> [    9.654675] ==================================================================
> 

Oops, good catch! Indeed, it is too late to use memblock_free().

BTW, is it safe to call memblock_free_late() in early boot stage,
because xbc_free_mem() will be called also from xbc_init().
If not, we need a custom internal __xbc_exit() or xbc_cleanup()
which is called from xbc_init() and uses memblock_free().

Thank you,


> Cc: Stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Qiang Zhang <qiang4.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
>  lib/bootconfig.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/bootconfig.c b/lib/bootconfig.c
> index c59d26068a64..4524ee944df0 100644
> --- a/lib/bootconfig.c
> +++ b/lib/bootconfig.c
> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static inline void * __init xbc_alloc_mem(size_t size)
>  
>  static inline void __init xbc_free_mem(void *addr, size_t size)
>  {
> -	memblock_free(addr, size);
> +	memblock_free_late(__pa(addr), size);
>  }
>  
>  #else /* !__KERNEL__ */
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH RESEND] bootconfig: use memblock_free_late to free xbc memory to buddy
  2024-04-12  7:34 ` Masami Hiramatsu
@ 2024-04-12  9:29   ` Qiang Zhang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Qiang Zhang @ 2024-04-12  9:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Masami Hiramatsu
  Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel, Qiang Zhang,
	Stable

On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 04:34:48PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 10:41:04 +0800
>qiang4.zhang@linux.intel.com wrote:
>
>> From: Qiang Zhang <qiang4.zhang@intel.com>
>> 
>> On the time to free xbc memory, memblock has handed over memory to buddy
>> allocator. So it doesn't make sense to free memory back to memblock.
>> memblock_free() called by xbc_exit() even causes UAF bugs on architectures
>> with CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK disabled like x86. Following KASAN logs
>> shows this case.
>> 
>> [    9.410890] ==================================================================
>> [    9.418962] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in memblock_isolate_range+0x12d/0x260
>> [    9.426850] Read of size 8 at addr ffff88845dd30000 by task swapper/0/1
>> 
>> [    9.435901] CPU: 9 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G     U             6.9.0-rc3-00208-g586b5dfb51b9 #5
>> [    9.446403] Hardware name: Intel Corporation RPLP LP5 (CPU:RaptorLake)/RPLP LP5 (ID:13), BIOS IRPPN02.01.01.00.00.19.015.D-00000000 Dec 28 2023
>> [    9.460789] Call Trace:
>> [    9.463518]  <TASK>
>> [    9.465859]  dump_stack_lvl+0x53/0x70
>> [    9.469949]  print_report+0xce/0x610
>> [    9.473944]  ? __virt_addr_valid+0xf5/0x1b0
>> [    9.478619]  ? memblock_isolate_range+0x12d/0x260
>> [    9.483877]  kasan_report+0xc6/0x100
>> [    9.487870]  ? memblock_isolate_range+0x12d/0x260
>> [    9.493125]  memblock_isolate_range+0x12d/0x260
>> [    9.498187]  memblock_phys_free+0xb4/0x160
>> [    9.502762]  ? __pfx_memblock_phys_free+0x10/0x10
>> [    9.508021]  ? mutex_unlock+0x7e/0xd0
>> [    9.512111]  ? __pfx_mutex_unlock+0x10/0x10
>> [    9.516786]  ? kernel_init_freeable+0x2d4/0x430
>> [    9.521850]  ? __pfx_kernel_init+0x10/0x10
>> [    9.526426]  xbc_exit+0x17/0x70
>> [    9.529935]  kernel_init+0x38/0x1e0
>> [    9.533829]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0xd/0x30
>> [    9.538601]  ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50
>> [    9.542596]  ? __pfx_kernel_init+0x10/0x10
>> [    9.547170]  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
>> [    9.551552]  </TASK>
>> 
>> [    9.555649] The buggy address belongs to the physical page:
>> [    9.561875] page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x1 pfn:0x45dd30
>> [    9.570821] flags: 0x200000000000000(node=0|zone=2)
>> [    9.576271] page_type: 0xffffffff()
>> [    9.580167] raw: 0200000000000000 ffffea0011774c48 ffffea0012ba1848 0000000000000000
>> [    9.588823] raw: 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000
>> [    9.597476] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
>> 
>> [    9.605362] Memory state around the buggy address:
>> [    9.610714]  ffff88845dd2ff00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>> [    9.618786]  ffff88845dd2ff80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>> [    9.626857] >ffff88845dd30000: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
>> [    9.634930]                    ^
>> [    9.638534]  ffff88845dd30080: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
>> [    9.646605]  ffff88845dd30100: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
>> [    9.654675] ==================================================================
>> 
>
>Oops, good catch! Indeed, it is too late to use memblock_free().
>
>BTW, is it safe to call memblock_free_late() in early boot stage,
>because xbc_free_mem() will be called also from xbc_init().
>If not, we need a custom internal __xbc_exit() or xbc_cleanup()
>which is called from xbc_init() and uses memblock_free().

No, memblock_free_late() can't be used early.
Exit and Cleanup seem alike and are confusing. Maybe adding a early flag to
_xbc_exit(bool early) is more clear. I will push a V2 for this.

>
>Thank you,
>
>
>> Cc: Stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Qiang Zhang <qiang4.zhang@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  lib/bootconfig.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/lib/bootconfig.c b/lib/bootconfig.c
>> index c59d26068a64..4524ee944df0 100644
>> --- a/lib/bootconfig.c
>> +++ b/lib/bootconfig.c
>> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static inline void * __init xbc_alloc_mem(size_t size)
>>  
>>  static inline void __init xbc_free_mem(void *addr, size_t size)
>>  {
>> -	memblock_free(addr, size);
>> +	memblock_free_late(__pa(addr), size);
>>  }
>>  
>>  #else /* !__KERNEL__ */
>> -- 
>> 2.39.2
>> 
>> 
>
>
>-- 
>Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-04-12  9:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-04-12  2:41 [PATCH RESEND] bootconfig: use memblock_free_late to free xbc memory to buddy qiang4.zhang
2024-04-12  7:34 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-12  9:29   ` Qiang Zhang

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).