From: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
suleiman@google.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Vineeth Pillai <vineeth@bitbyteword.org>,
Youssef Esmat <youssefesmat@google.com>,
Beau Belgrave <beaub@linux.microsoft.com>,
Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] ring-buffer: Allow mapped field to be set without mapping
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:47:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZhlJc6gni3rcOWW7@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240411012904.237435058@goodmis.org>
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 09:25:42PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>
> In preparation for having the ring buffer mapped to a dedicated location,
> which will have the same restrictions as user space memory mapped buffers,
> allow it to use the "mapped" field of the ring_buffer_per_cpu structure
> without having the user space meta page mapping.
>
> When this starts using the mapped field, it will need to handle adding a
> user space mapping (and removing it) from a ring buffer that is using a
> dedicated memory range.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> ---
> kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 10 +++++++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> index 793ecc454039..44b1d5f1a99a 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> @@ -5223,6 +5223,9 @@ static void rb_update_meta_page(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
> {
> struct trace_buffer_meta *meta = cpu_buffer->meta_page;
>
> + if (!meta)
> + return;
> +
> meta->reader.read = cpu_buffer->reader_page->read;
> meta->reader.id = cpu_buffer->reader_page->id;
> meta->reader.lost_events = cpu_buffer->lost_events;
> @@ -6167,7 +6170,7 @@ rb_get_mapped_buffer(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu)
>
> mutex_lock(&cpu_buffer->mapping_lock);
>
> - if (!cpu_buffer->mapped) {
> + if (!cpu_buffer->mapped || !cpu_buffer->meta_page) {
> mutex_unlock(&cpu_buffer->mapping_lock);
> return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> }
> @@ -6345,12 +6348,13 @@ int ring_buffer_map(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu,
IIUC, we still allow to map from user-space this buffer. So we now can have
mapped && !meta_page.
Then the "if (cpu_buffer->mapped) {" that skips the meta_page creation in
ring_buffer_map() should be replaced by if (cpu_buffer->meta_page).
> */
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
> rb_setup_ids_meta_page(cpu_buffer, subbuf_ids);
> +
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
>
> err = __rb_map_vma(cpu_buffer, vma);
> if (!err) {
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
> - cpu_buffer->mapped = 1;
> + cpu_buffer->mapped++;
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
> } else {
> kfree(cpu_buffer->subbuf_ids);
> @@ -6388,7 +6392,7 @@ int ring_buffer_unmap(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu)
> mutex_lock(&buffer->mutex);
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
In this function, there's also a check for cpu_buffer->mapped > 1. This avoids
killing the meta-page while someone is still in use.
It seems like a dedicated meta_page counter will be necessary. Otherwise, in the
event of a ring-buffer mapped at boot we, would setup the meta-page on the first
mmap() and never tear it down.
>
> - cpu_buffer->mapped = 0;
> + cpu_buffer->mapped--;
>
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-12 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-11 1:25 [PATCH v2 00/11] tracing: Persistent traces across a reboot or crash Steven Rostedt
2024-04-11 1:25 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] ring-buffer: Allow mapped field to be set without mapping Steven Rostedt
2024-04-12 14:47 ` Vincent Donnefort [this message]
2024-04-11 1:25 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] ring-buffer: Add ring_buffer_alloc_range() Steven Rostedt
2024-04-11 1:25 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] ring-buffer: Add ring_buffer_meta data Steven Rostedt
2024-04-11 1:25 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] tracing: Implement creating an instance based on a given memory region Steven Rostedt
2024-04-11 1:25 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] ring-buffer: Add output of ring buffer meta page Steven Rostedt
2024-04-11 1:25 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] ring-buffer: Add test if range of boot buffer is valid Steven Rostedt
2024-04-11 1:25 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] ring-buffer: Validate boot range memory events Steven Rostedt
2024-04-11 1:25 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] ring-buffer: Save text and data locations in mapped meta data Steven Rostedt
2024-04-11 1:25 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] tracing/ring-buffer: Add last_boot_info file to boot instance Steven Rostedt
2024-04-11 1:25 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] tracing: Handle old buffer mappings for event strings and functions Steven Rostedt
2024-04-11 1:25 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] tracing: Update function tracing output for previous boot buffer Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZhlJc6gni3rcOWW7@google.com \
--to=vdonnefort@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=beaub@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=suleiman@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vineeth@bitbyteword.org \
--cc=youssefesmat@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).