From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D6701E53F; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 18:44:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713897855; cv=none; b=eJJojNpP+YNG4y5RvlwFITjSZtddyNUeYxGe4j7Ipali/3MK1X1vjwuKdWj64M/U5RnyY8rzx3fn7LNvzEuQr5KOuu5cF7WCe4sBjsNIuGC2P1ukYF8aD1uzUqcLj9UqTZ+8701ApLORvmA8DMl3Si8XR2U8WdMi1ZHlQm0AMzE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713897855; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Eh9zhjxxN1SsvPJ8tSCa0BbWuSgXZjcEkhJDt0+ZCWw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=AUZ00UZ42UCGzpoyUbY1XGugCFOzUC2zLogpeZJ10rHI29unvdOiaTbXhqbqr0kRWaaCQliUxfDhZRrt5EulyFg09YRArOh3r53M/ftmVKe6WJaBl8wIXOrsrduBnCqD2JkSXBnIhybDnZWmW3xyP1XNyIHJMPWgTqk+rCbrNcg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=sTdsLXFR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="sTdsLXFR" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=r34+nTm/8Jbk3qeyC42lEKxQEubfYHcW3Uknob791/g=; b=sTdsLXFRE+QcyX+0QJ8WCgaQYk jiSZ6Kg9oD2pelNjtWjILcEQkP/tyHd4UJmsQbaA2Jitxjalcki5VI03zdGPwpwTxSoe3aIbli3qQ dWH7sElHDAutoKt8KDm5nian7HuEUHVgySIzKpZXw53KNkQNHisfiYi9aT2zUjYwSYlqMi/pKFh4h lR+8fzkY2is97ohNEfJiNYIyw5wG0OUC6MDW4MRyh7HEtQLG80vucUI1prRhC7ITcRjqm0SAho5j2 lxk7qbgnL2WHJoutm2s37b7MEjM+hCAz2PrtFU951qAi7PqrN+vxilNTvPssOcF0h7m744Qbr1drk dX6rIqQw==; Received: from mcgrof by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rzL7i-00000001AcU-0fdH; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 18:44:10 +0000 Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 11:44:10 -0700 From: Luis Chamberlain To: Mike Rapoport Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Ghiti , Andrew Morton , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_T=F6pel?= , Catalin Marinas , Christophe Leroy , "David S. Miller" , Dinh Nguyen , Donald Dutile , Eric Chanudet , Heiko Carstens , Helge Deller , Huacai Chen , Kent Overstreet , Mark Rutland , Masami Hiramatsu , Michael Ellerman , Nadav Amit , Palmer Dabbelt , Peter Zijlstra , Rick Edgecombe , Russell King , Sam Ravnborg , Song Liu , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Thomas Gleixner , Will Deacon , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/15] mm: jit/text allocator Message-ID: References: <20240422094436.3625171-1-rppt@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240422094436.3625171-1-rppt@kernel.org> Sender: Luis Chamberlain On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 12:44:21PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" > > (something went wrong with the prevois posting, sorry for the noise) > > Hi, > > Since v3 I looked into making execmem more of an utility toolbox, as we > discussed at LPC with Mark Rutland, but it was getting more hairier than > having a struct describing architecture constraints and a type identifying > the consumer of execmem. > > And I do think that having the description of architecture constraints for > allocations of executable memory in a single place is better than having it > spread all over the place. > > The patches available via git: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/linux.git/log/?h=execmem/v5 Thanks! I've merged and pushed this onto modules-next in its entirety now for wider testing. Luis