From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/7] uprobe: Add support for session consumer
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 13:34:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZuQjPCdLkKnPQsu0@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240913105750.GC19305@redhat.com>
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 12:57:51PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 09/13, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure the realloc will help, I feel like we need to allocate return
> > consumer for each called handler separately to be safe
>
> How about something like the (pseudo) code below? Note that this way
> we do not need uprobe->consumers_cnt. Note also that krealloc() should
> be unlikely and it checks ksize() before it does another allocation.
>
> Oleg.
>
> static size_t ri_size(int consumers_cnt)
> {
> return sizeof(struct return_instance) +
> sizeof(struct return_consumer) * consumers_cnt;
> }
>
> #define DEF_CNT 4 // arbitrary value
>
> static struct return_instance *alloc_return_instance(void)
> {
> struct return_instance *ri;
>
> ri = kzalloc(ri_size(DEF_CNT), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!ri)
> return ZERO_SIZE_PTR;
>
> ri->consumers_cnt = DEF_CNT;
> return ri;
> }
>
> static struct return_instance *push_id_cookie(struct return_instance *ri, int idx,
> __u64 id, __u64 cookie)
> {
> if (unlikely(ri == ZERO_SIZE_PTR))
> return ri;
>
> if (unlikely(idx >= ri->consumers_cnt)) {
> ri->consumers_cnt += DEF_CNT;
> ri = krealloc(ri, ri_size(ri->consumers_cnt), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!ri) {
> kfree(ri);
> return ZERO_SIZE_PTR;
> }
> }
>
> ri->consumers[idx].id = id;
> ri->consumers[idx].cookie = cookie;
> return ri;
> }
>
> static void handler_chain(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> ...
> struct return_instance *ri = NULL;
> int push_idx = 0;
>
> list_for_each_entry_rcu(uc, &uprobe->consumers, cons_node, rcu_read_lock_trace_held()) {
> __u64 cookie = 0;
> int rc = 0;
>
> if (uc->handler)
> rc = uc->handler(uc, regs, &cookie);
>
> remove &= rc;
> has_consumers = true;
>
> if (!uc->ret_handler || rc == UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE || rc == 2)
> continue;
>
> if (!ri)
> ri = alloc_return_instance();
>
> // or, better if (rc = UPROBE_HANDLER_I_WANT_MY_COOKIE)
> if (uc->handler))
> ri = push_id_cookie(ri, push_idx++, uc->id, cookie);
> }
>
> if (!ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(ri)) {
should we rather bail out right after we fail to allocate ri above?
> ri->consumers_cnt = push_idx;
> prepare_uretprobe(uprobe, regs, ri);
> }
>
> ...
> }
>
nice, I like that, will try to to plug it with the rest
thanks,
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-13 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-09 7:45 [PATCHv3 0/7] uprobe, bpf: Add session support Jiri Olsa
2024-09-09 7:45 ` [PATCHv3 1/7] uprobe: Add support for session consumer Jiri Olsa
2024-09-09 23:44 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-09-10 7:17 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-09-10 14:10 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-09-11 11:48 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-09-12 16:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-09-13 8:22 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-09-13 10:07 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-09-13 10:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-09-13 11:34 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2024-09-13 11:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-09-12 16:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-09-13 8:36 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-09-13 9:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-09-13 10:17 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-09-13 11:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-09-09 7:45 ` [PATCHv3 2/7] bpf: Add support for uprobe multi session attach Jiri Olsa
2024-09-09 23:44 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-09-10 7:17 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-09-10 18:09 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-09-09 7:45 ` [PATCHv3 3/7] bpf: Add support for uprobe multi session context Jiri Olsa
2024-09-09 7:45 ` [PATCHv3 4/7] libbpf: Add support for uprobe multi session attach Jiri Olsa
2024-09-09 23:44 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-09-10 7:17 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-09-09 7:45 ` [PATCHv3 5/7] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session test Jiri Olsa
2024-09-09 23:45 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-09-10 7:17 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-09-09 7:45 ` [PATCHv3 6/7] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session cookie test Jiri Olsa
2024-09-09 7:45 ` [PATCHv3 7/7] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe session recursive test Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZuQjPCdLkKnPQsu0@krava \
--to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).