From: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
To: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Weissschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>,
Tomas Glozar <tglozar@redhat.com>,
John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>, Wen Yang <wen.yang@linux.dev>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/17] rv: Prevent unintentional tracepoints during KUnit tests
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 09:23:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a04e3522b94e1267395a1bc5409c86a8ba49aaeb.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878q7n2six.fsf@yellow.woof>
On Tue, 2026-07-07 at 09:00 +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com> writes:
> > Monitor initialisation also called during KUnit tests may register some
> > tracepoints, this can lead to issues since we don't expect real monitor
> > events running during KUnit tests.
> >
> > Prevent tracepoint registration if an RV KUnit test is running.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
>
> Somehow I have no recollection of seeing this patch.
Well, I'm fairly sure you reviewed it ;)
> But since we already hold rv_interface_lock during the test, is this
> really necessary?
This is for things like ltl_monitor_init() that attaches the newtask probe.
The function is also doing a few other things we may not want to do, to be fair,
but calling the monitor_init() function as-is was the easiest solution I could
think of. Also ha_monitor_init() may attach a probe.
I suppose I could also do some more targeted initialisation/destruction, in fact
right now, the LTL initialisation does a bunch of stuff tests don't need and
doesn't do what they do need (initialise the dummy tasks, which aren't part of
the task list).
I should probably rethink this a little.
Thanks,
Gabriele
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-07 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-25 12:14 [PATCH v3 00/17] rv: Add selftests to tools and KUnit tests Gabriele Monaco
2026-06-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v3 01/17] rv: Use generic rv_this for the rv_monitor variable in LTL Gabriele Monaco
2026-07-02 13:43 ` Nam Cao
2026-06-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v3 02/17] tools/rv: Fix exit status when monitor execution fails Gabriele Monaco
2026-06-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v3 03/17] verification/rvgen: Improve rv_dir discovery in RVGenerator Gabriele Monaco
2026-07-02 13:53 ` Nam Cao
2026-07-02 14:00 ` Thomas Weissschuh
2026-07-02 14:01 ` Gabriele Monaco
2026-07-02 14:09 ` Thomas Weissschuh
2026-07-02 14:16 ` Nam Cao
2026-06-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v3 04/17] tools/rv: Add selftests Gabriele Monaco
2026-06-28 17:10 ` Wen Yang
2026-06-29 6:51 ` Gabriele Monaco
2026-06-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v3 05/17] verification/rvgen: Add golden and spec folders for tests Gabriele Monaco
2026-06-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v3 06/17] verification/rvgen: Add selftests Gabriele Monaco
2026-06-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v3 07/17] rv: Add KUnit stub to rv_react() and rv_*_task_monitor_slot() Gabriele Monaco
2026-07-02 13:59 ` Nam Cao
2026-06-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v3 08/17] rv: Export task monitor slot and react symbols Gabriele Monaco
2026-07-02 14:00 ` Nam Cao
2026-06-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v3 09/17] rv: Add KUnit tests for some DA/HA monitors Gabriele Monaco
2026-07-07 6:52 ` Nam Cao
2026-06-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v3 10/17] rv: Add KUnit stub for current Gabriele Monaco
2026-06-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v3 11/17] rv: Prevent unintentional tracepoints during KUnit tests Gabriele Monaco
2026-06-28 17:17 ` Wen Yang
2026-07-07 7:00 ` Nam Cao
2026-07-07 7:23 ` Gabriele Monaco [this message]
2026-06-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v3 12/17] rv: Add KUnit tests for some LTL monitors Gabriele Monaco
2026-07-07 7:04 ` Nam Cao
2026-06-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v3 13/17] verification/rvgen: Add the rvgen kunit subcommand Gabriele Monaco
2026-06-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v3 14/17] verification/rvgen: Add selftests for rvgen kunit Gabriele Monaco
2026-06-28 17:06 ` Wen Yang
2026-06-29 7:04 ` Gabriele Monaco
2026-06-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v3 15/17] selftests/verification: Fix wrong errexit assumption Gabriele Monaco
2026-06-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v3 16/17] selftests/verification: Rearrange the wwnr_printk test Gabriele Monaco
2026-06-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v3 17/17] selftests/verification: Add selftests for deadline and stall monitors Gabriele Monaco
2026-06-28 16:58 ` Wen Yang
2026-07-02 14:05 ` Gabriele Monaco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a04e3522b94e1267395a1bc5409c86a8ba49aaeb.camel@redhat.com \
--to=gmonaco@redhat.com \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=namcao@linutronix.de \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglozar@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de \
--cc=wen.yang@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox