linux-trace-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: ryan.roberts@arm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, cl@gentwo.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
	mhocko@suse.com, apopple@nvidia.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	will@kernel.org, baohua@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz,
	srivatsa@csail.mit.edu, haowenchao22@gmail.com, hughd@google.com,
	aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, yang@os.amperecomputing.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, ioworker0@gmail.com,
	wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, ziy@nvidia.com, jglisse@google.com,
	surenb@google.com, vishal.moola@gmail.com, zokeefe@google.com,
	zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com,
	21cnbao@gmail.com, willy@infradead.org,
	kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, david@redhat.com,
	aarcange@redhat.com, raquini@redhat.com, sunnanyong@huawei.com,
	usamaarif642@gmail.com, audra@redhat.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, tiwai@suse.de
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 7/9] khugepaged: add mTHP support
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 09:52:55 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a0cd24fe-b12c-40cd-a1d2-c1a3985dfdde@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250211003028.213461-8-npache@redhat.com>



On 11/02/25 6:00 am, Nico Pache wrote:
> Introduce the ability for khugepaged to collapse to different mTHP sizes.
> While scanning a PMD range for potential collapse candidates, keep track
> of pages in MIN_MTHP_ORDER chunks via a bitmap. Each bit represents a
> utilized region of order MIN_MTHP_ORDER ptes. We remove the restriction
> of max_ptes_none during the scan phase so we dont bailout early and miss
> potential mTHP candidates.
> 
> After the scan is complete we will perform binary recursion on the
> bitmap to determine which mTHP size would be most efficient to collapse
> to. max_ptes_none will be scaled by the attempted collapse order to
> determine how full a THP must be to be eligible.
> 
> If a mTHP collapse is attempted, but contains swapped out, or shared
> pages, we dont perform the collapse.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>
> ---
>   mm/khugepaged.c | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>   1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
> index c8048d9ec7fb..cd310989725b 100644
> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> @@ -1127,13 +1127,14 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
>   {
>   	LIST_HEAD(compound_pagelist);
>   	pmd_t *pmd, _pmd;
> -	pte_t *pte;
> +	pte_t *pte, mthp_pte;
>   	pgtable_t pgtable;
>   	struct folio *folio;
>   	spinlock_t *pmd_ptl, *pte_ptl;
>   	int result = SCAN_FAIL;
>   	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
>   	struct mmu_notifier_range range;
> +	unsigned long _address = address + offset * PAGE_SIZE;
>   	VM_BUG_ON(address & ~HPAGE_PMD_MASK);
>   
>   	/*
> @@ -1148,12 +1149,13 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
>   		*mmap_locked = false;
>   	}
>   
> -	result = alloc_charge_folio(&folio, mm, cc, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
> +	result = alloc_charge_folio(&folio, mm, cc, order);
>   	if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED)
>   		goto out_nolock;
>   
>   	mmap_read_lock(mm);
> -	result = hugepage_vma_revalidate(mm, address, true, &vma, cc, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
> +	*mmap_locked = true;
> +	result = hugepage_vma_revalidate(mm, address, true, &vma, cc, order);
>   	if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED) {
>   		mmap_read_unlock(mm);
>   		goto out_nolock;
> @@ -1171,13 +1173,14 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
>   		 * released when it fails. So we jump out_nolock directly in
>   		 * that case.  Continuing to collapse causes inconsistency.
>   		 */
> -		result = __collapse_huge_page_swapin(mm, vma, address, pmd,
> -				referenced, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
> +		result = __collapse_huge_page_swapin(mm, vma, _address, pmd,
> +				referenced, order);
>   		if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED)
>   			goto out_nolock;
>   	}
>   
>   	mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> +	*mmap_locked = false;
>   	/*
>   	 * Prevent all access to pagetables with the exception of
>   	 * gup_fast later handled by the ptep_clear_flush and the VM
> @@ -1187,7 +1190,7 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
>   	 * mmap_lock.
>   	 */
>   	mmap_write_lock(mm);
> -	result = hugepage_vma_revalidate(mm, address, true, &vma, cc, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
> +	result = hugepage_vma_revalidate(mm, address, true, &vma, cc, order);
>   	if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED)
>   		goto out_up_write;
>   	/* check if the pmd is still valid */
> @@ -1198,11 +1201,12 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
>   	vma_start_write(vma);
>   	anon_vma_lock_write(vma->anon_vma);
>   
> -	mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR, 0, mm, address,
> -				address + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
> +	mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR, 0, mm, _address,
> +				_address + (PAGE_SIZE << order));

As I have mentioned before, since you are isolating the PTE table in 
both cases, you need to do the mmu_notifier_* stuff for HPAGE_PMD_SIZE 
in any case. Check out patch 8 from my patchset.

>   	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
>   
>   	pmd_ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pmd); /* probably unnecessary */
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * This removes any huge TLB entry from the CPU so we won't allow
>   	 * huge and small TLB entries for the same virtual address to
> @@ -1216,10 +1220,10 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
>   	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
>   	tlb_remove_table_sync_one();
>   
> -	pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, &_pmd, address, &pte_ptl);
> +	pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, &_pmd, _address, &pte_ptl);
>   	if (pte) {
> -		result = __collapse_huge_page_isolate(vma, address, pte, cc,
> -					&compound_pagelist, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
> +		result = __collapse_huge_page_isolate(vma, _address, pte, cc,
> +					&compound_pagelist, order);
>   		spin_unlock(pte_ptl);
>   	} else {
>   		result = SCAN_PMD_NULL;
> @@ -1248,8 +1252,8 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
>   	anon_vma_unlock_write(vma->anon_vma);
>   
>   	result = __collapse_huge_page_copy(pte, folio, pmd, _pmd,
> -					   vma, address, pte_ptl,
> -					   &compound_pagelist, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
> +					   vma, _address, pte_ptl,
> +					   &compound_pagelist, order);
>   	pte_unmap(pte);
>   	if (unlikely(result != SCAN_SUCCEED))
>   		goto out_up_write;
> @@ -1260,20 +1264,37 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
>   	 * write.
>   	 */
>   	__folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
> -	pgtable = pmd_pgtable(_pmd);
> -
> -	_pmd = mk_huge_pmd(&folio->page, vma->vm_page_prot);
> -	_pmd = maybe_pmd_mkwrite(pmd_mkdirty(_pmd), vma);
> -
> -	spin_lock(pmd_ptl);
> -	BUG_ON(!pmd_none(*pmd));
> -	folio_add_new_anon_rmap(folio, vma, address, RMAP_EXCLUSIVE);
> -	folio_add_lru_vma(folio, vma);
> -	pgtable_trans_huge_deposit(mm, pmd, pgtable);
> -	set_pmd_at(mm, address, pmd, _pmd);
> -	update_mmu_cache_pmd(vma, address, pmd);
> -	deferred_split_folio(folio, false);
> -	spin_unlock(pmd_ptl);

My personal opinion is that this if-else nesting looks really weird. 
This is why I separated out mTHP collapse into a separate function.


> +	if (order == HPAGE_PMD_ORDER) {
> +		pgtable = pmd_pgtable(_pmd);
> +		_pmd = mk_huge_pmd(&folio->page, vma->vm_page_prot);
> +		_pmd = maybe_pmd_mkwrite(pmd_mkdirty(_pmd), vma);
> +
> +		spin_lock(pmd_ptl);
> +		BUG_ON(!pmd_none(*pmd));
> +		folio_add_new_anon_rmap(folio, vma, _address, RMAP_EXCLUSIVE);
> +		folio_add_lru_vma(folio, vma);
> +		pgtable_trans_huge_deposit(mm, pmd, pgtable);
> +		set_pmd_at(mm, address, pmd, _pmd);
> +		update_mmu_cache_pmd(vma, address, pmd);
> +		deferred_split_folio(folio, false);
> +		spin_unlock(pmd_ptl);
> +	} else { //mTHP
> +		mthp_pte = mk_pte(&folio->page, vma->vm_page_prot);
> +		mthp_pte = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(mthp_pte), vma);
> +
> +		spin_lock(pmd_ptl);
> +		folio_ref_add(folio, (1 << order) - 1);
> +		folio_add_new_anon_rmap(folio, vma, _address, RMAP_EXCLUSIVE);
> +		folio_add_lru_vma(folio, vma);
> +		spin_lock(pte_ptl);
> +		set_ptes(vma->vm_mm, _address, pte, mthp_pte, (1 << order));
> +		update_mmu_cache_range(NULL, vma, _address, pte, (1 << order));
> +		spin_unlock(pte_ptl);
> +		smp_wmb(); /* make pte visible before pmd */
> +		pmd_populate(mm, pmd, pmd_pgtable(_pmd));
> +		deferred_split_folio(folio, false);
> +		spin_unlock(pmd_ptl);
> +	}
>   
>   	folio = NULL;
>   
> @@ -1353,21 +1374,27 @@ static int khugepaged_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
>   {
>   	pmd_t *pmd;
>   	pte_t *pte, *_pte;
> +	int i;
>   	int result = SCAN_FAIL, referenced = 0;
>   	int none_or_zero = 0, shared = 0;
>   	struct page *page = NULL;
>   	struct folio *folio = NULL;
>   	unsigned long _address;
> +	unsigned long enabled_orders;
>   	spinlock_t *ptl;
>   	int node = NUMA_NO_NODE, unmapped = 0;
>   	bool writable = false;
> -
> +	int chunk_none_count = 0;
> +	int scaled_none = khugepaged_max_ptes_none >> (HPAGE_PMD_ORDER - MIN_MTHP_ORDER);
> +	unsigned long tva_flags = cc->is_khugepaged ? TVA_ENFORCE_SYSFS : 0;
>   	VM_BUG_ON(address & ~HPAGE_PMD_MASK);
>   
>   	result = find_pmd_or_thp_or_none(mm, address, &pmd);
>   	if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED)
>   		goto out;
>   
> +	bitmap_zero(cc->mthp_bitmap, MAX_MTHP_BITMAP_SIZE);
> +	bitmap_zero(cc->mthp_bitmap_temp, MAX_MTHP_BITMAP_SIZE);
>   	memset(cc->node_load, 0, sizeof(cc->node_load));
>   	nodes_clear(cc->alloc_nmask);
>   	pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, address, &ptl);
> @@ -1376,8 +1403,12 @@ static int khugepaged_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
>   		goto out;
>   	}
>   
> -	for (_address = address, _pte = pte; _pte < pte + HPAGE_PMD_NR;
> -	     _pte++, _address += PAGE_SIZE) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < HPAGE_PMD_NR; i++) {
> +		if (i % MIN_MTHP_NR == 0)
> +			chunk_none_count = 0;
> +
> +		_pte = pte + i;
> +		_address = address + i * PAGE_SIZE;
>   		pte_t pteval = ptep_get(_pte);
>   		if (is_swap_pte(pteval)) {
>   			++unmapped;
> @@ -1400,16 +1431,14 @@ static int khugepaged_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
>   			}
>   		}
>   		if (pte_none(pteval) || is_zero_pfn(pte_pfn(pteval))) {
> +			++chunk_none_count;
>   			++none_or_zero;
> -			if (!userfaultfd_armed(vma) &&
> -			    (!cc->is_khugepaged ||
> -			     none_or_zero <= khugepaged_max_ptes_none)) {
> -				continue;
> -			} else {
> +			if (userfaultfd_armed(vma)) {
>   				result = SCAN_EXCEED_NONE_PTE;
>   				count_vm_event(THP_SCAN_EXCEED_NONE_PTE);
>   				goto out_unmap;
>   			}
> +			continue;
>   		}
>   		if (pte_uffd_wp(pteval)) {
>   			/*
> @@ -1500,7 +1529,16 @@ static int khugepaged_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
>   		     folio_test_referenced(folio) || mmu_notifier_test_young(vma->vm_mm,
>   								     address)))
>   			referenced++;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * we are reading in MIN_MTHP_NR page chunks. if there are no empty
> +		 * pages keep track of it in the bitmap for mTHP collapsing.
> +		 */
> +		if (chunk_none_count < scaled_none &&
> +			(i + 1) % MIN_MTHP_NR == 0)
> +			bitmap_set(cc->mthp_bitmap, i / MIN_MTHP_NR, 1);
>   	}
> +
>   	if (!writable) {
>   		result = SCAN_PAGE_RO;
>   	} else if (cc->is_khugepaged &&
> @@ -1513,10 +1551,14 @@ static int khugepaged_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
>   out_unmap:
>   	pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl);
>   	if (result == SCAN_SUCCEED) {
> -		result = collapse_huge_page(mm, address, referenced,
> -					    unmapped, cc, mmap_locked, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER, 0);
> -		/* collapse_huge_page will return with the mmap_lock released */
> -		*mmap_locked = false;
> +		enabled_orders = thp_vma_allowable_orders(vma, vma->vm_flags,
> +			tva_flags, THP_ORDERS_ALL_ANON);
> +		result = khugepaged_scan_bitmap(mm, address, referenced, unmapped, cc,
> +			       mmap_locked, enabled_orders);
> +		if (result > 0)
> +			result = SCAN_SUCCEED;
> +		else
> +			result = SCAN_FAIL;
>   	}
>   out:
>   	trace_mm_khugepaged_scan_pmd(mm, &folio->page, writable, referenced,
> @@ -2476,11 +2518,13 @@ static int khugepaged_collapse_single_pmd(unsigned long addr, struct mm_struct *
>   			fput(file);
>   			if (result == SCAN_PTE_MAPPED_HUGEPAGE) {
>   				mmap_read_lock(mm);
> +				*mmap_locked = true;
>   				if (khugepaged_test_exit_or_disable(mm))
>   					goto end;
>   				result = collapse_pte_mapped_thp(mm, addr,
>   								 !cc->is_khugepaged);
>   				mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> +				*mmap_locked = false;
>   			}
>   		} else {
>   			result = khugepaged_scan_pmd(mm, vma, addr,


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-18  4:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-11  0:30 [RFC v2 0/9] khugepaged: mTHP support Nico Pache
2025-02-11  0:30 ` [RFC v2 1/9] introduce khugepaged_collapse_single_pmd to unify khugepaged and madvise_collapse Nico Pache
2025-02-17 17:11   ` Usama Arif
2025-02-17 19:56     ` Nico Pache
2025-02-18 16:26   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-18 22:24     ` Nico Pache
2025-02-11  0:30 ` [RFC v2 2/9] khugepaged: rename hpage_collapse_* to khugepaged_* Nico Pache
2025-02-18 16:29   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-11  0:30 ` [RFC v2 3/9] khugepaged: generalize hugepage_vma_revalidate for mTHP support Nico Pache
2025-02-11  0:30 ` [RFC v2 4/9] khugepaged: generalize alloc_charge_folio " Nico Pache
2025-02-19 15:29   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-11  0:30 ` [RFC v2 5/9] khugepaged: generalize __collapse_huge_page_* " Nico Pache
2025-02-19 15:39   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-19 16:02     ` Nico Pache
2025-02-11  0:30 ` [RFC v2 6/9] khugepaged: introduce khugepaged_scan_bitmap " Nico Pache
2025-02-17  7:27   ` Dev Jain
2025-02-17 19:12   ` Usama Arif
2025-02-19 16:28   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-20 18:48     ` Nico Pache
2025-02-11  0:30 ` [RFC v2 7/9] khugepaged: add " Nico Pache
2025-02-12 17:04   ` Usama Arif
2025-02-12 18:16     ` Nico Pache
2025-02-17 20:55   ` Usama Arif
2025-02-17 21:22     ` Nico Pache
2025-02-18  4:22   ` Dev Jain [this message]
2025-03-03 19:18     ` Nico Pache
2025-03-04  5:10       ` Dev Jain
2025-02-19 16:52   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-03-03 19:13     ` Nico Pache
2025-03-05  9:11       ` Dev Jain
2025-03-05  9:07     ` Dev Jain
2025-03-07  6:38   ` Dev Jain
2025-03-07 20:14     ` Nico Pache
2025-03-10  4:17       ` Dev Jain
2025-02-11  0:30 ` [RFC v2 8/9] khugepaged: improve tracepoints for mTHP orders Nico Pache
2025-02-11  0:30 ` [RFC v2 9/9] khugepaged: skip collapsing mTHP to smaller orders Nico Pache
2025-02-19 16:57   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-11 12:49 ` [RFC v2 0/9] khugepaged: mTHP support Dev Jain
2025-02-12 16:49   ` Nico Pache
2025-02-13  8:26     ` Dev Jain
2025-02-13 11:21       ` Dev Jain
2025-02-13 19:39       ` Nico Pache
2025-02-14  2:01         ` Dev Jain
2025-02-15  0:52           ` Nico Pache
2025-02-15  6:38             ` Dev Jain
2025-02-17  8:05               ` Dev Jain
2025-02-17 19:19                 ` Nico Pache
2025-02-17  6:39 ` Dev Jain
2025-02-17 19:15   ` Nico Pache
2025-02-18 16:07 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-18 22:30   ` Nico Pache
2025-02-19  9:01     ` Dev Jain
2025-02-20 19:12       ` Nico Pache
2025-02-21  4:57         ` Dev Jain
2025-02-19 17:00 ` Ryan Roberts

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a0cd24fe-b12c-40cd-a1d2-c1a3985dfdde@arm.com \
    --to=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=audra@redhat.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=haowenchao22@gmail.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jglisse@google.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=raquini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=srivatsa@csail.mit.edu \
    --cc=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=vishal.moola@gmail.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=zokeefe@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).