From: wen.yang@linux.dev
To: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
Cc: "Nam Cao" <namcao@linutronix.de>,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Wen Yang" <wen.yang@linux.dev>,
"Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/5] rv/reactors: use LD_WAIT_SPIN as the reactor lockdep wait type
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 01:10:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a43e36b73cad69d7e9f26f234b97733c8e74e495.1788705281.git.wen.yang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1788705281.git.wen.yang@linux.dev>
From: Wen Yang <wen.yang@linux.dev>
rv_react() overrides the lockdep wait type to LD_WAIT_FREE to enforce
that reactor callbacks take no locks. But callbacks run in the context
of the triggering tracepoint, which can be preemptible task context on
any kernel. A timer interrupt firing during the callback makes the
interrupt-exit path schedule and take rq->__lock (LD_WAIT_SPIN) while
the LD_WAIT_FREE override is still held, producing a spurious
"Invalid wait context" warning:
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
context-{5:5}
1 lock held by kunit_try_catch/209:
#0: (rv_react_map-wait-type-override){+.+.}-{1:1}
kunit_try_catch/209 is trying to lock:
ffff8a743ed3e8a0 (&rq->__lock){-...}-{2:2}
Use LD_WAIT_SPIN instead of LD_WAIT_FREE, which causes false-positive
warnings in preemptible contexts due to scheduler preemption taking
rq->__lock. Add documentation to runtime-verification.rst.
Fixes: 69d8895cb9a9 ("rv: Add explicit lockdep context for reactors")
Reviewed-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang@linux.dev>
Cc: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/trace/rv/rv_reactors.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/rv/rv_reactors.c b/kernel/trace/rv/rv_reactors.c
index 2f5fc8d18dea..ff7d478227c3 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/rv/rv_reactors.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/rv/rv_reactors.c
@@ -465,7 +465,15 @@ int init_rv_reactors(struct dentry *root_dir)
void rv_react(struct rv_monitor *monitor, const char *msg, ...)
{
- static DEFINE_WAIT_OVERRIDE_MAP(rv_react_map, LD_WAIT_FREE);
+ /*
+ * Reactors must not explicitly take locks, so they should be
+ * LD_WAIT_FREE. However, reactor callbacks can run with preemption
+ * enabled, meaning the preempting code (e.g. the scheduler taking
+ * rq->__lock at LD_WAIT_SPIN) may violate that constraint. Use
+ * LD_WAIT_SPIN to avoid false-positive lockdep reports.
+ * But you should still NOT be using locks in reactors.
+ */
+ static DEFINE_WAIT_OVERRIDE_MAP(rv_react_map, LD_WAIT_SPIN);
va_list args;
if (!rv_reacting_on() || !monitor->react)
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-06 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-06 17:10 [PATCH v5 0/5] rv/reactors: fix lockdep warning and add tests wen.yang
2026-09-06 17:10 ` wen.yang [this message]
2026-09-06 17:18 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] rv/reactors: use LD_WAIT_SPIN as the reactor lockdep wait type sashiko-bot
2026-09-06 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] rv/reactors: propagate rv_register_reactor() error from reactor init wen.yang
2026-09-06 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] rv/reactors: export rv_register_reactor() and rv_unregister_reactor() wen.yang
2026-09-11 6:53 ` Gabriele Monaco
2026-09-06 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] rv/reactors: add KUnit tests for reactor registration and dispatch wen.yang
2026-09-06 17:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-06 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] selftests/verification: Test loadable module-based reactor wen.yang
2026-09-06 17:19 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a43e36b73cad69d7e9f26f234b97733c8e74e495.1788705281.git.wen.yang@linux.dev \
--to=wen.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=gmonaco@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namcao@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox