From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ej1-f43.google.com (mail-ej1-f43.google.com [209.85.218.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E30E248F4B; Tue, 27 May 2025 13:45:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.43 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748353537; cv=none; b=aMcx2tJ77eV9i2sVpwLLGje5j/bfQZGyeCttk+Jwc/nu4CqbuuhEqACBTd3HG48DkB+uuXygUh4LazHTbuzozHxmxDHt36btLwa3r2coV1JmcO4DbrhAkWR55pOU4pR5SwbR++9SZzVbjARnYHouY2IM38SkMgCJQDB3wZ5GrRw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748353537; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Qfbm2sNLA0vn8DCioBPKrEQvyUb4mLsh3zo14odwXcI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=FeFSTbt+rOZQwdFRZybSwDnoW5czjCEYC08iubpDTI2MkAtGUiXnqHqGeuG8WkQrqBv9DPcfK/DJmqx/XP6daYEzgGEIjXqkSxMSbkGuTb14AJ46XRg2DQIbQFocYISBT7p3w07Fl8+/jf3v20BGsbv+4KZzr2s8qBQ8qnqFfiM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.43 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-ej1-f43.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-ace94273f0dso660221066b.3; Tue, 27 May 2025 06:45:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1748353533; x=1748958333; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=jAZ7tO9uQ2iBPuBw8kzZnx9pJG/ibWbywo2r/XgEUb4=; b=X7HHkntkWtY0XuAbqLvuzaY/tWQXULgg+83c49w51irqhfeM3APfbMIxc/oQIMGX5+ EIWBtsfZtmJbOiFenI0bdA1dk8TP/Oo3ZDxMQDASUxbGOQphiOvDABZU1EVSLvbqdPZK iOnPqr3KqggoQ5hACrTXBev8PjgUtrlUtQivCqr4DiNs06HePI5Ilh8buDiDHvrDEUiy /rBcoPK1YBMXY0j5QbOfvDPRu4NL6W66QbyvNGRLl3qC5UKvUtG7Hwi4JRDV/Dw/wOo6 /sRWjBgCYLae4dERLhTL5qdazNGU4ZpyFCmlgJKmFfpLNF9ivr9Rzg7pFoixeWXohHCi UwcQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUQa5zLzl9lYeP+1ghCWy32CpOlpQD02BReEGWqb2CgXHN51dOh+345Pg0jPcQ2UV6//wQhm9R1O3A12Yyz5HCt2aMx@vger.kernel.org, AJvYcCVEq/DhBgc6JVjBZJdzWClnRVgI6/OSbaiOpsfyoUfB3RJ1S7oyL5c0nvz68dYaH7cFcrBRrR+j@vger.kernel.org, AJvYcCXBHbLlxduO6UBmC0rF0WadIL5sF4zpelst/SsCwTq7YoKQqCUEMARVs4MrJMylJadX0omnKnGWcdUP34c=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwvgmFvdbuMlRr8cLLd726V8pwbe4xh7SGzpXeeZKpZzb0n9hXm VKqUORqU5umfAXptlQnfwAXPVu2rGEQ30fgzLJK8qGqnQnr1gelWP2dL X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncv0d36u8ZvyO5YiHiiN8ilFfE9slV5Axp/ULC4yGgFBLc2cRmTkPJ8Mt+cDVZ3 Upi2Fv5ZLCAMgq6RUVTN6Bgium1c4MVeIXCpaxkXMyV0im3GfCUtbf0Qn62AUS70fGJwyM+djFi YoO4iOgZ92duvoq+9LfwJyarjgwBODDA6TOUfNMSAp9a5TOtVbCCl/8W7kOu5Y5xUq9XrV8vfgz dkn8Ims7T+pAzjmFvlgxmWT4i7wh209lnk08VGTUHEDWpzwlGU+I6tSwIbAUhAuM9RM18yLraos +U9DqplkEi2K7bFC3LiIqBH9ysXsIjUHzgjghGxENQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH6j/BghWYjYKpMeSsKyBBh+LmICoGS6swWWHK7btRyaIUSVFGpwNJybOBUK3x7YvyreV/gCw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3e95:b0:ad2:3f1f:7974 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-ad85b12061bmr1022077166b.10.1748353532576; Tue, 27 May 2025 06:45:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com ([2a03:2880:30ff:6::]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-ad892483ba9sm83515466b.147.2025.05.27.06.45.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 27 May 2025 06:45:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 06:45:29 -0700 From: Breno Leitao To: Willem de Bruijn Cc: Song Liu , Paolo Abeni , Steven Rostedt , Masami Hiramatsu , Mathieu Desnoyers , "David S. Miller" , David Ahern , Eric Dumazet , "kuba@kernel.org" , Simon Horman , "kuniyu@amazon.com" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "yonghong.song@linux.dev" , "song@kernel.org" , Kernel Team Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] udp: Add tracepoint for udp_sendmsg() Message-ID: References: <20250416-udp_sendmsg-v1-1-1a886b8733c2@debian.org> <67a977bc-a4b9-4c8b-bf2f-9e9e6bb0811e@redhat.com> <0f67e414-d39a-4b71-9c9e-7dc027cc4ac3@redhat.com> <4D934267-EE73-49DB-BEAF-7550945A38C9@fb.com> <680122de92908_166f4f2942a@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch> <68026672df030_1d380329421@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <68026672df030_1d380329421@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch> Hello, On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 10:49:22AM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > Song Liu wrote: > > Do you mean we need to also add tracepoints for udpv6_sendmsg? > > If there is consensus that a tracepoint at this point is valuable, > then it should be supported equally for IPv4 and IPv6. > > That holds true for all such hooks. No IPv4 only. Revamping this thread to make sure we have a conclusion. Any objection for not having the tracepoint in UDP sendmsg, both IPv4 and IPv6? Thanks --breno