Linux Trace Kernel
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>
Cc: mhiramat@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, hca@linux.ibm.com,
	revest@chromium.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/4] fprobe: use rhltable for fprobe_ip_table
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 15:43:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aKMuENl9omxi6OwJ@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250817024607.296117-2-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>

On Sun, Aug 17, 2025 at 10:46:02AM +0800, Menglong Dong wrote:

SNIP

> +/* Node insertion and deletion requires the fprobe_mutex */
> +static int insert_fprobe_node(struct fprobe_hlist_node *node)
> +{
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&fprobe_mutex);
>  
> -	next = find_first_fprobe_node(ip);
> -	if (next) {
> -		hlist_add_before_rcu(&node->hlist, &next->hlist);
> -		return;
> -	}
> -	head = &fprobe_ip_table[hash_ptr((void *)ip, FPROBE_IP_HASH_BITS)];
> -	hlist_add_head_rcu(&node->hlist, head);
> +	return rhltable_insert(&fprobe_ip_table, &node->hlist, fprobe_rht_params);
>  }
>  
>  /* Return true if there are synonims */
> @@ -92,9 +92,11 @@ static bool delete_fprobe_node(struct fprobe_hlist_node *node)
>  	/* Avoid double deleting */
>  	if (READ_ONCE(node->fp) != NULL) {
>  		WRITE_ONCE(node->fp, NULL);
> -		hlist_del_rcu(&node->hlist);
> +		rhltable_remove(&fprobe_ip_table, &node->hlist,
> +				fprobe_rht_params);
>  	}
> -	return !!find_first_fprobe_node(node->addr);
> +	return !!rhltable_lookup(&fprobe_ip_table, &node->addr,
> +				 fprobe_rht_params);

I think rhltable_lookup needs rcu lock

>  }
>  
>  /* Check existence of the fprobe */
> @@ -249,9 +251,10 @@ static inline int __fprobe_kprobe_handler(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent
>  static int fprobe_entry(struct ftrace_graph_ent *trace, struct fgraph_ops *gops,
>  			struct ftrace_regs *fregs)
>  {
> -	struct fprobe_hlist_node *node, *first;
>  	unsigned long *fgraph_data = NULL;
>  	unsigned long func = trace->func;
> +	struct fprobe_hlist_node *node;
> +	struct rhlist_head *head, *pos;
>  	unsigned long ret_ip;
>  	int reserved_words;
>  	struct fprobe *fp;
> @@ -260,14 +263,11 @@ static int fprobe_entry(struct ftrace_graph_ent *trace, struct fgraph_ops *gops,
>  	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!fregs))
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	first = node = find_first_fprobe_node(func);
> -	if (unlikely(!first))
> -		return 0;
> -
> +	head = rhltable_lookup(&fprobe_ip_table, &func, fprobe_rht_params);

ditto

jirka


>  	reserved_words = 0;
> -	hlist_for_each_entry_from_rcu(node, hlist) {
> +	rhl_for_each_entry_rcu(node, pos, head, hlist) {
>  		if (node->addr != func)
> -			break;
> +			continue;
>  		fp = READ_ONCE(node->fp);
>  		if (!fp || !fp->exit_handler)
>  			continue;
> @@ -278,13 +278,12 @@ static int fprobe_entry(struct ftrace_graph_ent *trace, struct fgraph_ops *gops,
>  		reserved_words +=
>  			FPROBE_HEADER_SIZE_IN_LONG + SIZE_IN_LONG(fp->entry_data_size);
>  	}
> -	node = first;
>  	if (reserved_words) {
>  		fgraph_data = fgraph_reserve_data(gops->idx, reserved_words * sizeof(long));
>  		if (unlikely(!fgraph_data)) {
> -			hlist_for_each_entry_from_rcu(node, hlist) {
> +			rhl_for_each_entry_rcu(node, pos, head, hlist) {
>  				if (node->addr != func)
> -					break;
> +					continue;
>  				fp = READ_ONCE(node->fp);
>  				if (fp && !fprobe_disabled(fp))
>  					fp->nmissed++;
> @@ -299,12 +298,12 @@ static int fprobe_entry(struct ftrace_graph_ent *trace, struct fgraph_ops *gops,
>  	 */
>  	ret_ip = ftrace_regs_get_return_address(fregs);
>  	used = 0;
> -	hlist_for_each_entry_from_rcu(node, hlist) {
> +	rhl_for_each_entry_rcu(node, pos, head, hlist) {
>  		int data_size;
>  		void *data;
>  
>  		if (node->addr != func)
> -			break;
> +			continue;
>  		fp = READ_ONCE(node->fp);
>  		if (!fp || fprobe_disabled(fp))
>  			continue;
> @@ -448,25 +447,21 @@ static int fprobe_addr_list_add(struct fprobe_addr_list *alist, unsigned long ad
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static void fprobe_remove_node_in_module(struct module *mod, struct hlist_head *head,
> -					struct fprobe_addr_list *alist)
> +static void fprobe_remove_node_in_module(struct module *mod, struct fprobe_hlist_node *node,
> +					 struct fprobe_addr_list *alist)
>  {
> -	struct fprobe_hlist_node *node;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> -	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(node, head, hlist,
> -				 lockdep_is_held(&fprobe_mutex)) {
> -		if (!within_module(node->addr, mod))
> -			continue;
> -		if (delete_fprobe_node(node))
> -			continue;
> -		/*
> -		 * If failed to update alist, just continue to update hlist.
> -		 * Therefore, at list user handler will not hit anymore.
> -		 */
> -		if (!ret)
> -			ret = fprobe_addr_list_add(alist, node->addr);
> -	}
> +	if (!within_module(node->addr, mod))
> +		return;
> +	if (delete_fprobe_node(node))
> +		return;
> +	/*
> +	 * If failed to update alist, just continue to update hlist.
> +	 * Therefore, at list user handler will not hit anymore.
> +	 */
> +	if (!ret)
> +		ret = fprobe_addr_list_add(alist, node->addr);
>  }
>  
>  /* Handle module unloading to manage fprobe_ip_table. */
> @@ -474,8 +469,9 @@ static int fprobe_module_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
>  				  unsigned long val, void *data)
>  {
>  	struct fprobe_addr_list alist = {.size = FPROBE_IPS_BATCH_INIT};
> +	struct fprobe_hlist_node *node;
> +	struct rhashtable_iter iter;
>  	struct module *mod = data;
> -	int i;
>  
>  	if (val != MODULE_STATE_GOING)
>  		return NOTIFY_DONE;
> @@ -486,8 +482,16 @@ static int fprobe_module_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
>  		return NOTIFY_DONE;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&fprobe_mutex);
> -	for (i = 0; i < FPROBE_IP_TABLE_SIZE; i++)
> -		fprobe_remove_node_in_module(mod, &fprobe_ip_table[i], &alist);
> +	rhltable_walk_enter(&fprobe_ip_table, &iter);
> +	do {
> +		rhashtable_walk_start(&iter);
> +
> +		while ((node = rhashtable_walk_next(&iter)) && !IS_ERR(node))
> +			fprobe_remove_node_in_module(mod, node, &alist);
> +
> +		rhashtable_walk_stop(&iter);
> +	} while (node == ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN));
> +	rhashtable_walk_exit(&iter);
>  
>  	if (alist.index < alist.size && alist.index > 0)
>  		ftrace_set_filter_ips(&fprobe_graph_ops.ops,
> @@ -727,8 +731,16 @@ int register_fprobe_ips(struct fprobe *fp, unsigned long *addrs, int num)
>  	ret = fprobe_graph_add_ips(addrs, num);
>  	if (!ret) {
>  		add_fprobe_hash(fp);
> -		for (i = 0; i < hlist_array->size; i++)
> -			insert_fprobe_node(&hlist_array->array[i]);
> +		for (i = 0; i < hlist_array->size; i++) {
> +			ret = insert_fprobe_node(&hlist_array->array[i]);
> +			if (ret)
> +				break;
> +		}
> +		/* fallback on insert error */
> +		if (ret) {
> +			for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
> +				delete_fprobe_node(&hlist_array->array[i]);
> +		}
>  	}
>  	mutex_unlock(&fprobe_mutex);
>  
> @@ -824,3 +836,10 @@ int unregister_fprobe(struct fprobe *fp)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unregister_fprobe);
> +
> +static int __init fprobe_initcall(void)
> +{
> +	rhltable_init(&fprobe_ip_table, &fprobe_rht_params);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +late_initcall(fprobe_initcall);
> -- 
> 2.50.1
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-18 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-17  2:46 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/4] fprobe: use rhashtable for fprobe_ip_table Menglong Dong
2025-08-17  2:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/4] fprobe: use rhltable " Menglong Dong
2025-08-18 13:43   ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2025-08-19  1:13     ` Menglong Dong
2025-08-19  2:11     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-08-19  2:26       ` Menglong Dong
2025-08-20  2:05       ` Herbert Xu
2025-08-17  2:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/4] selftests/bpf: move get_ksyms and get_addrs to trace_helpers.c Menglong Dong
2025-08-17  2:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/4] selftests/bpf: skip recursive functions for kprobe_multi Menglong Dong
2025-08-17  2:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 4/4] selftests/bpf: add benchmark testing for kprobe-multi-all Menglong Dong
2025-08-19  1:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/4] fprobe: use rhashtable for fprobe_ip_table Masami Hiramatsu
2025-08-19  2:01   ` Menglong Dong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aKMuENl9omxi6OwJ@krava \
    --to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=revest@chromium.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox