From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
andrey.grodzovsky@crowdstrike.com, mhiramat@kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com, olsajiri@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf 1/3] ftrace: Fix BPF fexit with livepatch
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 09:48:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aP8x2VthUhZf4QVv@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251026205445.1639632-2-song@kernel.org>
On Sun, Oct 26, 2025 at 01:54:43PM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> When livepatch is attached to the same function as bpf trampoline with
> a fexit program, bpf trampoline code calls register_ftrace_direct()
> twice. The first time will fail with -EAGAIN, and the second time it
> will succeed. This requires register_ftrace_direct() to unregister
> the address on the first attempt. Otherwise, the bpf trampoline cannot
> attach. Here is an easy way to reproduce this issue:
>
> insmod samples/livepatch/livepatch-sample.ko
> bpftrace -e 'fexit:cmdline_proc_show {}'
> ERROR: Unable to attach probe: fexit:vmlinux:cmdline_proc_show...
>
> Fix this by cleaning up the hash when register_ftrace_function_nolock hits
> errors.
>
> Also, move the code that resets ops->func and ops->trampoline to
> the error path of register_ftrace_direct().
>
> Fixes: d05cb470663a ("ftrace: Fix modification of direct_function hash while in use")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.6+
> Reported-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@crowdstrike.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/live-patching/c5058315a39d4615b333e485893345be@crowdstrike.com/
> Cc: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> Acked-and-tested-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@crowdstrike.com>
> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/trampoline.c | 5 -----
> kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
> index 5949095e51c3..f2cb0b097093 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
> @@ -479,11 +479,6 @@ static int bpf_trampoline_update(struct bpf_trampoline *tr, bool lock_direct_mut
> * BPF_TRAMP_F_SHARE_IPMODIFY is set, we can generate the
> * trampoline again, and retry register.
> */
> - /* reset fops->func and fops->trampoline for re-register */
> - tr->fops->func = NULL;
> - tr->fops->trampoline = 0;
> -
> - /* free im memory and reallocate later */
> bpf_tramp_image_free(im);
> goto again;
> }
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> index 42bd2ba68a82..725c224fb4e6 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> @@ -6048,6 +6048,12 @@ int register_ftrace_direct(struct ftrace_ops *ops, unsigned long addr)
> ops->direct_call = addr;
>
> err = register_ftrace_function_nolock(ops);
> + if (err) {
> + /* cleanup for possible another register call */
> + ops->func = NULL;
> + ops->trampoline = 0;
nit, we could cleanup also flags and direct_call just to be complete,
but at the same time it does not seem to affect anything
jirka
> + remove_direct_functions_hash(hash, addr);
> + }
>
> out_unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&direct_mutex);
> --
> 2.47.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-27 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-26 20:54 [PATCH v3 bpf 0/3] Fix ftrace for livepatch + BPF fexit programs Song Liu
2025-10-26 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 bpf 1/3] ftrace: Fix BPF fexit with livepatch Song Liu
2025-10-27 8:48 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2025-10-27 17:10 ` Song Liu
2025-10-27 17:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-10-27 17:11 ` Song Liu
2025-10-26 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 bpf 2/3] ftrace: bpf: Fix IPMODIFY + DIRECT in modify_ftrace_direct() Song Liu
2025-10-26 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 bpf 3/3] selftests/bpf: Add tests for livepatch + bpf trampoline Song Liu
2025-10-27 8:47 ` [PATCH v3 bpf 0/3] Fix ftrace for livepatch + BPF fexit programs Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aP8x2VthUhZf4QVv@krava \
--to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=andrey.grodzovsky@crowdstrike.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).