From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org
Cc: mhiramat@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, jpoimboe@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, yhs@fb.com,
songliubraving@fb.com, andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, clm@meta.com, ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/4] x86/fgraph,bpf: Fix stack ORC unwind from kprobe_multi return probe
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 10:27:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQnG-D8O8Jco9_4X@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bb44afd60873d171a8482032e466d2827018486ecd13b4047df74632d2df4950@mail.kernel.org>
On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 11:47:37PM +0000, bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
> > index 93156ac4f..b08c95872 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
> > @@ -56,6 +56,11 @@ arch_ftrace_get_regs(struct ftrace_regs *fregs)
> > return &arch_ftrace_regs(fregs)->regs;
> > }
> >
> > +#define arch_ftrace_partial_regs(regs) do { \
> > + regs->flags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_FIXED; \
> > + regs->cs = __KERNEL_CS; \
> > +} while (0)
> > +
>
> Can arch_ftrace_partial_regs read uninitialized regs->flags?
>
> In return_to_handler, the ftrace_regs structure is allocated on the
> stack but only a few fields are initialized (RAX, RDX, RBP, RSP).
> The EFLAGS/flags field is never written before
> arch_ftrace_partial_regs reads it:
>
> arch/x86/kernel/ftrace_64.S return_to_handler:
> subq $(FRAME_SIZE), %rsp # Allocate ftrace_regs on stack
> movq %rax, RAX(%rsp)
> movq %rdx, RDX(%rsp)
> movq %rbp, RBP(%rsp)
> movq %rsp, RSP(%rsp)
> # No initialization of EFLAGS field
>
> Then ftrace_partial_regs()->arch_ftrace_partial_regs() executes:
> regs->flags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_FIXED;
>
> This reads the uninitialized flags field. Stack allocations contain
> garbage, so regs->flags will have whatever data was previously on
> the stack. The &= operation produces undefined results when operating
> on uninitialized memory.
>
> For comparison, ftrace_regs_caller explicitly initializes EFLAGS:
> movq MCOUNT_REG_SIZE(%rsp), %rcx
> movq %rcx, EFLAGS(%rsp)
>
> Should return_to_handler initialize regs->flags to 0 (or another
> appropriate value) before arch_ftrace_partial_regs modifies it?
yes, that was in the initial version [1] but Stephen did not like that,
so I moved the flags init to later where it needs to take into account
other callers (that have meaningful flags) and just zeros the X86_EFLAGS_FIXED,
so we go through !perf_hw_regs leg in perf_callchain_kernel
jirka
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/aObSyt3qOnS_BMcy@krava/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-04 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-03 22:09 [PATCHv2 0/4] x86/fgraph,bpf: Fix ORC stack unwind from return probe Jiri Olsa
2025-11-03 22:09 ` [PATCHv2 1/4] Revert "perf/x86: Always store regs->ip in perf_callchain_kernel()" Jiri Olsa
2025-11-06 12:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-03 22:09 ` [PATCHv2 2/4] x86/fgraph,bpf: Fix stack ORC unwind from kprobe_multi return probe Jiri Olsa
2025-11-03 23:47 ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-11-04 9:27 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2025-11-06 12:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-07 22:22 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-11-03 22:09 ` [PATCHv2 3/4] selftests/bpf: Add stacktrace ips test for kprobe_multi/kretprobe_multi Jiri Olsa
2025-11-03 22:09 ` [PATCHv2 4/4] selftests/bpf: Add stacktrace ips test for raw_tp Jiri Olsa
2025-11-03 23:47 ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-11-04 8:35 ` Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aQnG-D8O8Jco9_4X@krava \
--to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=clm@meta.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).