linux-trace-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org
Cc: mhiramat@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, jpoimboe@kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, yhs@fb.com,
	songliubraving@fb.com, andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com,
	yonghong.song@linux.dev, clm@meta.com, ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/4] x86/fgraph,bpf: Fix stack ORC unwind from kprobe_multi return probe
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 10:27:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQnG-D8O8Jco9_4X@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bb44afd60873d171a8482032e466d2827018486ecd13b4047df74632d2df4950@mail.kernel.org>

On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 11:47:37PM +0000, bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
> > index 93156ac4f..b08c95872 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
> > @@ -56,6 +56,11 @@ arch_ftrace_get_regs(struct ftrace_regs *fregs)
> >  	return &arch_ftrace_regs(fregs)->regs;
> >  }
> >
> > +#define arch_ftrace_partial_regs(regs) do {	\
> > +	regs->flags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_FIXED;	\
> > +	regs->cs = __KERNEL_CS;			\
> > +} while (0)
> > +
> 
> Can arch_ftrace_partial_regs read uninitialized regs->flags?
> 
> In return_to_handler, the ftrace_regs structure is allocated on the
> stack but only a few fields are initialized (RAX, RDX, RBP, RSP).
> The EFLAGS/flags field is never written before
> arch_ftrace_partial_regs reads it:
> 
> arch/x86/kernel/ftrace_64.S return_to_handler:
>     subq $(FRAME_SIZE), %rsp    # Allocate ftrace_regs on stack
>     movq %rax, RAX(%rsp)
>     movq %rdx, RDX(%rsp)
>     movq %rbp, RBP(%rsp)
>     movq %rsp, RSP(%rsp)
>     # No initialization of EFLAGS field
> 
> Then ftrace_partial_regs()->arch_ftrace_partial_regs() executes:
>     regs->flags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_FIXED;
> 
> This reads the uninitialized flags field. Stack allocations contain
> garbage, so regs->flags will have whatever data was previously on
> the stack. The &= operation produces undefined results when operating
> on uninitialized memory.
> 
> For comparison, ftrace_regs_caller explicitly initializes EFLAGS:
>     movq MCOUNT_REG_SIZE(%rsp), %rcx
>     movq %rcx, EFLAGS(%rsp)
> 
> Should return_to_handler initialize regs->flags to 0 (or another
> appropriate value) before arch_ftrace_partial_regs modifies it?

yes, that was in the initial version [1] but Stephen did not like that,
so I moved the flags init to later where it needs to take into account
other callers (that have meaningful flags) and just zeros the X86_EFLAGS_FIXED,
so we go through !perf_hw_regs leg in perf_callchain_kernel

jirka


[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/aObSyt3qOnS_BMcy@krava/

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-04  9:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-03 22:09 [PATCHv2 0/4] x86/fgraph,bpf: Fix ORC stack unwind from return probe Jiri Olsa
2025-11-03 22:09 ` [PATCHv2 1/4] Revert "perf/x86: Always store regs->ip in perf_callchain_kernel()" Jiri Olsa
2025-11-06 12:27   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-03 22:09 ` [PATCHv2 2/4] x86/fgraph,bpf: Fix stack ORC unwind from kprobe_multi return probe Jiri Olsa
2025-11-03 23:47   ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-11-04  9:27     ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2025-11-06 12:29   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-07 22:22     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-11-03 22:09 ` [PATCHv2 3/4] selftests/bpf: Add stacktrace ips test for kprobe_multi/kretprobe_multi Jiri Olsa
2025-11-03 22:09 ` [PATCHv2 4/4] selftests/bpf: Add stacktrace ips test for raw_tp Jiri Olsa
2025-11-03 23:47   ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-11-04  8:35     ` Jiri Olsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aQnG-D8O8Jco9_4X@krava \
    --to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=clm@meta.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).