From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f45.google.com (mail-wm1-f45.google.com [209.85.128.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 103A02D2497 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 11:36:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.45 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763638583; cv=none; b=aBgdXCdvHxxQpagqnXLupuQlaI6Ll4ap+Lxe5GBsvc1zaRk28szDb71Rx/HRCNiunMcE2G2VO2yc7mGb7okxdapv6HluX0Oz2qmCI/IgnkEYnasQpNH05eEcdI4RvKxDZV8tAyneC1fTj81ynrei9Tw6QLE3t9MhhVvr2j+64PU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763638583; c=relaxed/simple; bh=F+0N4wMzGmWADzwl/vFuA6k8UEcvJMDKp1Ep/I+CU2Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GwowaKah6WQN0NoJ7VGWR2r0EglqtpP3NcwSjJ0G69TccERwoX1qdxbZVYWHg6FwyywkGzYa4LxJ9rO866rsxNRrZ22GmxDwYpXRQKGm5DeaU8mUyMMD+viHnqQSlDYhJI9wKd8CgwRjt3YXy4QhPlkYSHvpvY7xiEUC79IwT80= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=j/xlzzHw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.45 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="j/xlzzHw" Received: by mail-wm1-f45.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-477b5e0323bso9757645e9.0 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 03:36:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1763638580; x=1764243380; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TPlzmXt4DNVBdqLVvxiBIWu8Rl4FZ4bDuiyypGx7MuQ=; b=j/xlzzHwOB9rBb9sb/z155Frmjy58E48WgNJlGSxtBSCUN5E616mxCcGmhwnb/0hkp VZzSS1giFVpXwV0ObmekZjU4wrzbiqplWTVn6yD6tIsy6qWPKsvGcl7tXxbkl69HykAm DEmB+cV9h4CWNIambnMzS8bPKLKG3JURMRt8oaSZcFXMYu32wfUWXhgcoqk6okfOwTKY k7r2bQSHENsKretZkk19WddvE3zc+riDB+W/b1oTIGdpUYCQ6CiAjnCTRThfgkeoCSR/ jEjhZxJ22hcma1vTrXsoSOvyDVemaNOJ+BpGvMDAdO2tTWrt34ep/cO7oPMRw3GUTevI eObA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1763638580; x=1764243380; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TPlzmXt4DNVBdqLVvxiBIWu8Rl4FZ4bDuiyypGx7MuQ=; b=Uuga7BLLWrRm1KUYIfRLMmDkzD8GS1qzJsW+985I2JrwyKwcT9wq0+r6KFaEN8zofP GpzL3h0mYlMU/q6x/hCoYpz/Ha2/lpogLuQ7b/6nmCAjdGaeeJjc9fyuStkoNOECN6y3 RDkHG4TTgTU6ZLKH8qVRUTuHKKhJuv0qIg9ZsmjqnkvmCt7YHOtcwNYrHU18DAyOSfRh e8vfjv5ON/SsFFX5VwVd3PyQ9cl/xQql+dP8KpUue8xnDkL+TV/9aa8OLpfrpU0tGSEh GZOqMHKU82uIYOHyQrHFKyBP0baL9BUfcURC1a/Tq0k+CRUBiCWs27qoynT2IID+2XwK RoRg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUiScz0yqAGvw/45ukx2n3rlAaneYZom/zJ7mJc+VllKhgvavC+Fpo3AproQabDHNZapew8tMnxG3J2ehmliNuzOQ0=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxva3acpfmIvlk8kDLUxugisPgp/mkW7eEPrap92QxDESg6/+jE wTrwDSBRPJf9C4e9enAKu+6wh3afPt04Qy5kC/6gqL8EDeiSy197WLgzSBcmptH4Kg== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnct+zUwjkcDLsjH/XqwUsdCw4OqApSkHvRbMT/+kwq7DMW4k5zi29H39pE9Cwaa U1lVBTktk+1HraNNhUd4NcNOx9vCV5KnE3b1I7QJZcxugKAI8p/X595u9SfRRFzJ9Bu5WM2WZBR BevUKanjj0nNIfjV+U4ORTgl01AImI8JpCsj6S9Ud28qbyMMm2K8rfjUCR3wyOv+HSPTQ7GLab/ e3BXOZwmypPEx/zl/mdA473iR/1KSExBIiHQfn4t1DG1UoTnJcqdzKmLnciDSohA/fBXwtCkTC3 cfE1aUgJLVH6AOmzoif2C2h8vkeG5NzpuGII6Pj3jOOygNOpaYl+4vEac9XOlx21drVMe3Vi+Dk 5n7zAoQVw92SPVLDisR5ExVfPCLafonaRhJxXyJeYy880ghYWpsyBn6DprgLLDwS5klgNOJ4led bCtZnJ5eA10ISqfDs66x0S4Pz3CWnDkAx6kQ/pX6kqT09GS2oSCQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGcOCRDUWPkVUZ7ncQTNFf+q64GbtuEHTlJs5oKc83ztKfhHnrQKRpzLVqerrPSrM7dBJtv3A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2e4c:b0:477:9890:4528 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-477b9ea31e9mr14670485e9.2.1763638580134; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 03:36:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com (120.54.38.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.38.54.120]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-477a9e1b657sm60238005e9.17.2025.11.20.03.36.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 20 Nov 2025 03:36:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 11:36:16 +0000 From: Vincent Donnefort To: Marc Zyngier , g@google.com Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev, joey.gouly@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, jstultz@google.com, qperret@google.com, will@kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 20/28] KVM: arm64: Add clock support for the pKVM hyp Message-ID: References: <20251107093840.3779150-1-vdonnefort@google.com> <20251107093840.3779150-21-vdonnefort@google.com> <86cy5erprc.wl-maz@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86cy5erprc.wl-maz@kernel.org> [...] > > +/* Using host provided data. Do not use for anything else than debugging. */ > > +u64 trace_clock(void) > > +{ > > + struct clock_data *clock = &trace_clock_data; > > + u64 bank = smp_load_acquire(&clock->cur); > > + u64 cyc, ns; > > + > > + cyc = __arch_counter_get_cntpct() - clock->data[bank].epoch_cyc; > > I can only imagine that you don't care about the broken systems that > do not have a monotonic counter, and that will happily have their > counter swing back and forth? I haven't used the _stable() variant for the affected devices... Hum this will not be trivial from the hypervisor. I'll see what I can do. > > Also, you may want to document why you are using the physical counter > instead of the virtual one. I guess that you don't want CNTVOFF_EL2 to > apply when HCR_EL2.E2H==0, but given that you never allow anything > else for pKVM, this is slightly odd. You mean I might as well use __arch_counter_get_cntvct() as CNTVOFF_EL2 will always be ignored in the pKVM case? > > Thanks, > > M. > > -- > Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.