From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0BDC330319; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 16:17:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763137034; cv=none; b=j9CT0t7TGrwqekcrYso0CeNHumIXMpIRFmesYWHXFARhLoHO7z8Ca3/UnNsTzAZhrghLGHu0AaWhBMoarvFAt5uMrXudtp5KFkA5S7/lhofVXr7/8ry6HIN4LA6OTG3+U/clZMyECi1YcJVqlLly5ceQlpE8TsjsJfXZ8RMd/jo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763137034; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Px3lKZdUS5rdr+F3zZSev4T8mg958AG9l4kRlO2wCqE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=u3GZYZtepM7wQrdVwGSvK3uBo5r3MWdIMJ51YX9aeepaUE+LMD272fUPuog51qv4hP5YZKBcy0wmYKIkS8h7cjUiBzdRiYFPI9J8Xxy7qP4S/GuY1U2gd2YnTynaQEdlbjz/6A5HjZ9OOVHfjSZFKYEXG7Uw5+UnXzE2MPmko0s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=EBPYejEz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="EBPYejEz" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 343EBC4CEFB; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 16:17:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1763137033; bh=Px3lKZdUS5rdr+F3zZSev4T8mg958AG9l4kRlO2wCqE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=EBPYejEzrwCn4Zb5hqGfAGsRuk9RtKOvK6DJboD4IPKftcJOdg4oRRU5uT8NPBLE+ OCllQlduZ42OJyJUua2necJE+0YSdMcHbdeLObYCCvkrn/QwTZwzPnKXqb38rWi4fx mw+gUSWQ6/Z3DVBAUUf3g6ei/hgWhfp7oWapApA7/2onlPDePp296sVo1FRqC2qZLi VseGB5u3t8eCfXy0RDuL7FaQz+qNhJB6BR4RzMRRyHWBM8G63G1zF6mSYIYV2yixgW x5bf4nJawh3kaT0tOsY4WlKO02LdPnsxSPRrLeRVJEoXJ4IYeL7vJVSz00VvRSHbOa FVxXdc/8ggRbw== Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 16:17:06 +0000 From: Will Deacon To: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Namhyung Kim , Steven Rostedt , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Ian Rogers , Adrian Hunter , Mathieu Desnoyers , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/wprobe: Fix to avoid inifinite watchpoint exception on arm64 Message-ID: References: <176179481538.959775.12326313742393696258.stgit@devnote2> <20251104223735.4164f224790ea0aea267dff1@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251104223735.4164f224790ea0aea267dff1@kernel.org> On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 10:37:35PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > Gently ping. > > There is a bugfix (or strange behavior) on arm64 hw breakpoint but > to fix it cleanly, it should change the perf itself (but I'm not > sure why arm64 changes the behavior only for the default overflow > handlers.) Anyone knows it? It's because GDB expects to handle the stepping itself when using the ptrace interface (with a custom overflow handler to deliver SIGTRAP). Will