Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add Rust files to STATIC BRANCH/CALL and TRACING

[Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>]

On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 10:00:06AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jan 2026 19:36:29 +0100
> Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Jan 7, 2026 at 1:32 PM Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm proposing to include them under the existing entries, as that seems
> > > like the most obvious place to include them. However, there are multiple
> > > ways to do this. If you prefer to have them elsewhere, I would also be
> > > happy to create a new entry with me as maintaining them, or I'm also
> > > willing to be listed as R: under the entry. Regardless of how we list
> > > them in MAINTAINERS, I will be around if anything comes up. Let me know
> > > what you all prefer.  
> > 
> > I think this was meant to go after the `---`?
> > 
> > Whatever Steven et al. are happy with, this looks fine, thanks!
> > 
> > Acked-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
> > 
> 
> I guess the question is are those with expertise on the list of people to
> Cc?

I would be on cc either way as RUST includes F: rust/.

> I think it may be better to have a separate section for RUST so that the
> rust maintainers can be included in the M: part too. Perhaps:
> 
> STATIC BRANCH/CALL (RUST)
> 
>   and
> 
> TRACING (RUST)
> 
> And have the M of the other sections be R here?

Sure, we can do that.

Are you still willing to pick up the patches? I think that is simpler in
case there are any series that touch both the C and Rust parts. (Such as
the initial tracepoint series did.)

Alice