From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f46.google.com (mail-wm1-f46.google.com [209.85.128.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD5E82DE70D for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2026 08:31:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.46 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780302703; cv=none; b=prvqx/AyQSIabM42lJC5040Gcvpq4InAyxVpwFxSJkHOeYCUEFhYiXM4VyYcWjg/mAhyFUw+ZWNa/ZphYz4Y/K1mOHhqmBWKqg0Z10G14tqtwAUZNzDQcga7O05xbQSnk+GBtNYszVG8AiRR6HlAp3Gukz0kHE+ueT7d/ifSCUI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780302703; c=relaxed/simple; bh=d5tS/VYQvy11KKQdbITdO/cb5iPgnZacDSb2hI1SQqQ=; h=From:Date:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ddhIpiLktsK2kEQmMmC3vPRBS55Vaq2JWkNZhsL8hDwlVYlduBjk7dzSyE00w0SIAQEZcoSa7m6C1puisyzbqq+jUW7KUe2a5u9lJSBXIzv2YcZYFpO5GoDIzBR0paVW5zEjO3IJ7BZkH6hQey0PlZ9PFYlC/DicItcbaPy3G/A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=e3n9ziM5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.46 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="e3n9ziM5" Received: by mail-wm1-f46.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4908b92904fso45941595e9.0 for ; Mon, 01 Jun 2026 01:31:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1780302701; x=1780907501; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:date:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xAW5Os4pfjenGgpPUMRcNNYStYiDsva7wTl5T8rnAg4=; b=e3n9ziM5q5lYUTkuy/hA3RlCALxNikIWvqDE3QUaJXe3tk/p12rM+cwTQmuH+N966B fitQ7pfkbYaRmYSpHhIf3klMBkdon8RguTOgj7CAMBjsy3kn7zwr1ShVCVuYqPL1cuDm n3B3Ab6uayfZ0z26kQGOfvOBPWV+jwqWZwLfQey8waeSd9GvHF2VpDj0v/VCqEUDIJQh TG+yVL2zJVt4MIzOtKiQfzt7BKOh75kzIIoqgBZIHl21ylCv3JrxxGRAF+Gy+PwgZmAd uQjgm+3L8rus1bceNdunvAzBbr2q93BLLAJj2d2G7RD8fkTTSg3WsGScKZAqtQrulvOb aIrw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1780302701; x=1780907501; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:date:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xAW5Os4pfjenGgpPUMRcNNYStYiDsva7wTl5T8rnAg4=; b=pCuba0ib6reu98xdlxgM2a1ruoJQwobdmdMg7zLwZJ2tmgYbgBSYhwUmFAWPa6eBun mKgdinfirUYk9fX5T8oTaojl/cwG1yza+KsNDPXeAbi8LjcsWTT3kTUev85/hEqQ8OHy fA2e29nCzNkoVEHK8ujwOa+uNa0bQkJYJ5Bh5PHnXoOHV7aCquXy+eEWWKSc0OpwHLYH YdGKHI5kdOKgDWU/PwMFOU5T4lxSZ6IRf2CsScQAPGKZOn15en6CAAMDYDOatnby5Jms euGSxe/AqRBWNNvDbIz4a3SYkW9ZTY24mcQUcCQI+dLORDNIGq0y6rbLBNB1ASmslFP7 VnHg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ/RR9jxt/knl76K8eHx7Fsmy0MJkCuKfWYYzQJV9gft7Zaobph8qRc6hoV3qyE5CwaHrMpHifbUxQ/lUfmS6J+CsIk=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzSKxz3cp0wdbYebjgYyikUIMNV/gWB45myzVLGSM4kxY5VaeJF rb+bxEEvo1wcKF++qZ8jv2+3ovHYWP24CiZ2zR4Ff1v4+HOd2L+1fenA X-Gm-Gg: Acq92OEPoqv79ao7/kJzjiv+zHp3xN4Ac1JgJeIb5bXTiJ58rAhxHt/yHTDx7oGFIkA quLJZS2uxd5mZiEscMC8mckpoLVEealg3a8tClREqEQ9pvAMC8rVUYbGnCLnv+Oca5Z1M43Ir4M GC6xcRsCqkXia7Lzs5uFEj6Zin8KaKoLFWJ5FsCmPqabo7ddvN/Ecv0iCIIt0e/gI2YtQiTn2X9 fF8iZN18l7bsEf6PEWvD7Ra3Xj1o7JzaAt2W1tHoq7aWgJTK47bLSzaMtSmSgHL0iIxbQLA/+L9 4ae3zBUbMXYd/ajgO4b/0QVZqeLT0FvV6ntmNpeuaic9owbzFZEAreQGM0Yg8hBTAO1gMe11asS 2EOAjyY3ux5pffqqxHTy5yZ7GtdTNv+31bWwk9Gy9tsMUyx+wokGy+Am9vl/UfdIKVJ7Wd0KVDb gBBm+Jd/X0TDz4I2cJgxsGooC6jA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:450b:b0:490:6e11:c303 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-490a29213bamr196953175e9.13.1780302700991; Mon, 01 Jun 2026 01:31:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from krava ([2a02:8308:a00c:e200:b655:ff13:e355:16a3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-4909d696f25sm349567065e9.5.2026.06.01.01.31.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 01 Jun 2026 01:31:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Jiri Olsa X-Google-Original-From: Jiri Olsa Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 10:31:39 +0200 To: Jakub Sitnicki Cc: Oleg Nesterov , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Masami Hiramatsu , Andrii Nakryiko , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 13/13] selftests/bpf: Add tests for forked/cloned optimized uprobes Message-ID: References: <20260526205840.173790-1-jolsa@kernel.org> <20260526205840.173790-14-jolsa@kernel.org> <87ldd3665m.fsf@cloudflare.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ldd3665m.fsf@cloudflare.com> On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 03:00:05PM +0200, Jakub Sitnicki wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 10:58 PM +02, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > Adding tests for forked/cloned optimized uprobes and make > > sure the child can properly execute optimized probe for > > both fork (dups mm) and clone with CLONE_VM. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa > > --- > > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 88 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c > > index efff0c515184..033d32b4cc27 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c > > @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ > > > > #ifdef __x86_64__ > > > > +#define _GNU_SOURCE > > +#include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > @@ -936,6 +938,88 @@ static void test_uprobe_error(void) > > ASSERT_EQ(errno, EPROTO, "errno"); > > } > > > > +__attribute__((aligned(16))) > > +__nocf_check __weak __naked void uprobe_fork_test(void) > > +{ > > + asm volatile ( > > + ".byte 0x66, 0x2e, 0x0f, 0x1f, 0x84, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00\n" /* nop10 */ > > + "ret\n" > > + ); > > +} > > + > > +static int child_func(void *arg) > > Nit: Could annotate with noreturn: > > #include > > /* ... */ > > static noreturn int child_func(void *arg) yep, will change, thanks jirka > > > +{ > > + struct uprobe_syscall_executed *skel = arg; > > + > > + /* Make sure the child's probe is still there and optimized.. */ > > + if (memcmp(uprobe_fork_test, lea_rsp, sizeof(lea_rsp))) > > + _exit(1); > > + > > + skel->bss->pid = getpid(); > > + > > + /* .. and it executes properly. */ > > + uprobe_fork_test(); > > + > > + if (skel->bss->executed != 3) > > + _exit(2); > > + > > + _exit(0); > > +} > > [...] > > Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki