From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 08/12] selftests/bpf: Change uprobe syscall tests to use nop10
Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 17:44:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahRuW4IfVZgyps5k@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzZn0NvNwuPdh10z+MAdw-9K6CgZ0XnAL0J4XRpQHhFv2w@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 11:57:04AM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 5:45 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Optimized uprobes are now on top of 10-bytes nop instructions,
> > reflect that in existing tests.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > .../selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_trigger.c | 2 +-
> > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c | 28 ++++++++++---------
> > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/usdt.c | 25 ++++++++++-------
> > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/usdt_2.c | 2 +-
> > 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_trigger.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_trigger.c
> > index 2f22ec61667b..a60b8173cdc4 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_trigger.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_trigger.c
> > @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ static void *uprobe_producer_ret(void *input)
> > #ifdef __x86_64__
> > __nocf_check __weak void uprobe_target_nop5(void)
>
> heh, nop5 -> nop_a_lot ;)
>
>
> > {
> > - asm volatile (".byte 0x0f, 0x1f, 0x44, 0x00, 0x00");
> > + asm volatile (".byte 0x66, 0x2e, 0x0f, 0x1f, 0x84, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00");
> > }
> >
>
> [...]
>
> > @@ -420,7 +421,8 @@ static void *check_attach(struct uprobe_syscall_executed *skel, trigger_t trigge
> > ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->executed, executed, "executed");
> >
> > /* .. and check the trampoline is as expected. */
> > - call = (struct __arch_relative_insn *) addr;
> > + ASSERT_OK(memcmp(addr, lea_rsp, 5), "lea_rsp");
> > + call = (struct __arch_relative_insn *)(addr + 5);
> > tramp = (void *) (call + 1) + call->raddr;
> > ASSERT_EQ(call->op, 0xe8, "call");
> > ASSERT_OK(find_uprobes_trampoline(tramp), "uprobes_trampoline");
> > @@ -432,7 +434,7 @@ static void check_detach(void *addr, void *tramp)
> > {
> > /* [uprobes_trampoline] stays after detach */
> > ASSERT_OK(find_uprobes_trampoline(tramp), "uprobes_trampoline");
> > - ASSERT_OK(memcmp(addr, nop5, 5), "nop5");
> > + ASSERT_OK(memcmp(addr, jmp2B, 2), "jmp2B");
>
> yeah, not jump anymore?
mixed up the selftest change.. I had it fixed already,
new version will have both fixes ;-)
thanks,
jirka
>
> > }
> >
> > static void check(struct uprobe_syscall_executed *skel, struct bpf_link *link,
>
> [...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-25 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-21 12:43 [PATCHv3 00/12] uprobes/x86: Fix red zone issue for optimized uprobes Jiri Olsa
2026-05-21 12:44 ` [PATCHv3 01/12] uprobes/x86: Use proper mm_struct in __in_uprobe_trampoline Jiri Olsa
2026-05-22 18:50 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-05-21 12:44 ` [PATCHv3 02/12] uprobes/x86: Remove struct uprobe_trampoline object Jiri Olsa
2026-05-21 13:26 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-24 22:13 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-05-22 18:50 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-05-21 12:44 ` [PATCHv3 03/12] uprobes/x86: Allow to copy uprobe trampolines on fork Jiri Olsa
2026-05-22 18:50 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-05-24 21:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-05-21 12:44 ` [PATCHv3 04/12] uprobes/x86: Move optimized uprobe from nop5 to nop10 Jiri Olsa
2026-05-21 13:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-22 21:19 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-05-22 18:50 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-05-22 21:19 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-05-21 12:44 ` [PATCHv3 05/12] libbpf: Change has_nop_combo to work on top of nop10 Jiri Olsa
2026-05-22 18:52 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-05-22 21:28 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-05-21 12:44 ` [PATCHv3 06/12] libbpf: Detect uprobe syscall with new error Jiri Olsa
2026-05-21 13:26 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-21 12:44 ` [PATCHv3 07/12] selftests/bpf: Emit nop,nop10 instructions combo for x86_64 arch Jiri Olsa
2026-05-21 13:26 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-21 12:44 ` [PATCHv3 08/12] selftests/bpf: Change uprobe syscall tests to use nop10 Jiri Olsa
2026-05-21 13:26 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-22 18:57 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-05-25 15:44 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2026-05-21 12:44 ` [PATCHv3 09/12] selftests/bpf: Change uprobe/usdt trigger bench code " Jiri Olsa
2026-05-21 12:44 ` [PATCHv3 10/12] selftests/bpf: Add reattach tests for uprobe syscall Jiri Olsa
2026-05-21 12:44 ` [PATCHv3 11/12] selftests/bpf: Add tests for uprobe nop10 red zone clobbering Jiri Olsa
2026-05-21 13:26 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-25 15:44 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-05-21 12:44 ` [PATCHv3 12/12] selftests/bpf: Add tests for forked/cloned optimized uprobes Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ahRuW4IfVZgyps5k@krava \
--to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox