From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f51.google.com (mail-wr1-f51.google.com [209.85.221.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C92E3E834C for ; Wed, 27 May 2026 09:58:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.51 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779875911; cv=none; b=YR674pgzOazzO6LdYkaj+Cm56L+6lPToNdMERb1AVVjimAXBsQi2bb/x6dbNKuLziJ35Ptx3ihSo9FRNDAXumvZfn5Zv0Nd2gPu26rpArz9fhKDUSC1sgXrG++rgZP/nahtyHIYXPml/IVGslgJU/3VC60XY28DfjRWzGxoRb3s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779875911; c=relaxed/simple; bh=s+yPe7No/7GmDOI11CX93j1HW660H6AudQ7GSwyQM7U=; h=From:Date:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=s2beKemL0xemSCp4Lwa9LzrAOCxT2mFt/tDFHo8Xzh/8PMDxf35gMl0XDimcT0skyKEfmnP3nlDsqmYqsPvMMFMsbJc0NsUoXVB6wz8fBeuMTz0q3CFz+8Nhu2ArMv+e2XusY8yCZHU4yUsqbBHZu7lTrkRZ13fXk0Zw62zIGjw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=YYwxSKdK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="YYwxSKdK" Received: by mail-wr1-f51.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-43fe608cb92so7034088f8f.2 for ; Wed, 27 May 2026 02:58:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1779875909; x=1780480709; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:date:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YikjwhEm4geCtrb1bi/FLWqvUb+NITExv3m94HQTTGE=; b=YYwxSKdKn+K1MGPHQlUpTiYdxrWGtuJTYa7tlEksqnR3qDvp9QDcRh0I9cMa9h2CRN EgzxKZj2fQRiAkVjx+cMhTeAN/dHwCKKMS3Lm6f/TpYUwwQ/uHmWXDZda8pgkBU6B+8N dfQT+XvcNQCv2a162FsOTvGotqkCkMt0qbZjwTPXK2zX1MQA6fEqiTaN2NvuoVo79zSR ljKOdnPdtpFGX0zGkN+x58szqRdERy++TA9rpJix4IU41ityNx352qzUn8Bm6Lv/2rMi Kvse3kfygyaGghxGx5VQFMW7hrTOh/0Pc+FvYrYQxn4I9BghZMHwVW9z2EZAXG3xlzlA xF/g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1779875909; x=1780480709; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:date:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YikjwhEm4geCtrb1bi/FLWqvUb+NITExv3m94HQTTGE=; b=JXqmLDCzOOti8Sdxj1g5TOXFywE0+wOoZSNsQ5p9l4fmK8z8D8HtZnSqNUWiDB50XH fmyp68YqF7QSfYTFRGuN+KTW6VSkUawVrKPfmJWDFd/yPu9d7UVMQyZFuQCBYcDoeYnL fMdtHyzBSgkwLD+1dL8dcMkfOLeSFubPfxRhnGYlA3ogWKBjZ8JQd43d2Lg9pTSzCABw 1Zba3YxZxUchmSOu57pW4GaJV+UKQr6rosrPREji5RkfA5E2vCmtApsSf25G+CgHsfgF TRrP6vW5to32dJ33SWAJltBZG4LaJ2H9gveOatgtEN6Q+YJ58VaRFmp7UYr9PpS/Ki6S VsxA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ8YtJwoTZvGN5eKNyuRKctH59rcOswf1aCrSE7jQfM2iW0LIlpHUXwwzEz9Q1hC61wsv2yMA3ro/HI+At2t/tHSgH8=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzxp2AiaEkq/8p52xHHbYrD6Dv9sy0HzLiiBMHQhJ7IPBlcFpWO /x7x/xLof2pAxft/hTuV/9znkDjRaUo6tUXZ4ZV8xyd96+ubYcmvYBI+ X-Gm-Gg: Acq92OEcaH+InTtD3hPeP5hHVz3u1XKkJqn9MoYLRrjyLpTDi+VPpJUlFBEWL2PvRLy 3NG6p4JXBY5fj5YDjPTHFo8sM/ZmeqzyT3TjceUa35zytTCSN8Sx4ePr8J7NW1Vw3ZgbMg3Asqv EAfXuS8G8QKts9rCDv6kaGiz0I34zAa3AM6wBdkIS+81BM0fbUP1Wf3K3f0kvDdeXn0D8npz/oG YTfYGEtzwHJJBY1pNSLWZMtcdVx2dKG33MAAbnIqNjSXcp0U0OCKJ8ChefQ3uZdPokvl+SSmTpH r/Fg81XbdkoEMLV4tcTukmoXd6iUfiw52HmKQRiaJ+W8yibR7GAtXhOThXT1OO8aUNj1+cEP/eG XuoRNhaXI6+KleZuUL8yiGJqkIiAFw7afu2xJAhLg88RjdpF6MJtB3i54M9EaxHOvxkCNGUcL0n 6xhuKD0Ca3Y5zhceM9l90ny1QuKw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:6296:b0:490:5321:2466 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-49053212604mr277702225e9.20.1779875908611; Wed, 27 May 2026 02:58:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from krava ([2a02:8308:a00c:e200:b655:ff13:e355:16a3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-490838f7f35sm17953515e9.1.2026.05.27.02.58.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 27 May 2026 02:58:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Jiri Olsa X-Google-Original-From: Jiri Olsa Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 11:58:26 +0200 To: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org Cc: oleg@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, yonghong.song@linux.dev, clm@meta.com, ihor.solodrai@linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 03/13] uprobes/x86: Allow to copy uprobe trampolines on fork Message-ID: References: <20260526205840.173790-4-jolsa@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 09:46:40PM +0000, bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org wrote: > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c > > index 733655bc610e..c8af41ed681a 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c > > @@ -697,7 +697,7 @@ static struct vm_area_struct *get_uprobe_trampoline(struct mm_struct *mm, unsign > > return ERR_PTR(vaddr); > > > > return _install_special_mapping(mm, vaddr, PAGE_SIZE, > > - VM_READ|VM_EXEC|VM_MAYEXEC|VM_MAYREAD|VM_DONTCOPY|VM_IO, > > + VM_READ|VM_EXEC|VM_MAYEXEC|VM_MAYREAD|VM_IO, > > &tramp_mapping); > > } > > When a process with optimized uprobes is forked, the child inherits the > optimized code and trampoline. This means sys_uprobe invocations in the > child will go into the uprobe trampoline, and the syscall will keep > returning -EPROTO since no handler is registered. > > Is there a way to restore the original memory pages for clones? > > This behavior seems suboptimal from a performance perspective. For > standard int3-based uprobes, breakpoints are removed via > UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE. Could something similar be implemented for > optimized uprobes, perhaps with proper filtering in uprobe_multi? > > Reference: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzYo-8PAXFJt9MHoUn9ux1O2YVxJADC0tGSsacVu_R8Stw@mail.gmail.com/ and I replied in that thread that we can address that later: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ahNzlAfUnymDDGOR@krava/ jirka