From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC15B3E5EF7; Thu, 28 May 2026 12:14:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779970452; cv=none; b=b23wj9ET4IhW4eCwfyRZZ8of5mnge7lADRxyOb+rVfttTwvhh9XlKFk+qeYJ+SfY+rSyiSqNuiJZWRhclMcQdLMrULETY4v3U4LJ8g1SPDi12GFLBryHSvI336AUtjyb2Cy4e/Z4YzzS1jQOmW0hYb7cU0+QAsaYjUzgR04ZyUs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779970452; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4cQ8JPoreDqCvQMxc5JhutCyP9TWFjFpKhB2mX5Lx0s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KG3TjH0lXzaNRdQ4hQhZX+0QtF3fZ4vIcfjTFqzPt0XDcRxRfodvQ7n/LnSCcKboImwTyH0o0ZmzlrUISTT9LzIFOjifw50yN1UM2JoV4oPNTdn5TFotAa+TP9g1vVzT2HvGPVpdb9C7KkqjRFehWrFbHTGK3QmEj+sS/jngKGk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ldc/3XT1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ldc/3XT1" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 03BDF1F000E9; Thu, 28 May 2026 12:14:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1779970451; bh=FaTVnsukxIfl+0vWTY2TN9FtaUmZpG/XWW5mvzVegDE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=ldc/3XT1hiStKinZPOAX3z7OZ/HKo3Av7lA+XdF+bnJ+Sr0jt31e4fBwyggpTjj9y suK4JTOw+UjR2bxkZd2YbhND7qpI9hp5ZFx2C2zicJzJ/mDgM3fXSzSXdE4wxsSIDr 2oveZANOvaqX5ayNa9U1ujVZNTvLxEk5zEbvHI7OO+2fv+3SzMGRU8mCVkZJ51kq3Q /JsRh07nxiB85smXCvolldzioNd4HcQvh2Nx13m4+59FPXzPvEFIdP7WGckoUBKxGA p1DY59oETyE66/hxjEXaSeoFCPvOrb6hUSDhEFi9yGLZI/wOpkbo434fgeazUCpk4w YLVjyW0bZbrtw== Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 14:14:08 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Puranjay Mohan Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" , Neeraj Upadhyay , Joel Fernandes , Josh Triplett , Boqun Feng , Uladzislau Rezki , Steven Rostedt , Mathieu Desnoyers , Lai Jiangshan , Zqiang , Masami Hiramatsu , Davidlohr Bueso Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] RCU: Enable callbacks to benefit from expedited grace periods Message-ID: References: <20260417231203.785172-1-puranjay@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20260417231203.785172-1-puranjay@kernel.org> Hi, Le Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 04:11:48PM -0700, Puranjay Mohan a écrit : > RCU callbacks only track normal grace period sequence numbers. This > means callbacks must wait for normal GPs even when expedited GPs have > already elapsed. > > This series tracks both normal and expedited GP sequences in the > callback infrastructure using struct rcu_gp_oldstate, so callbacks > advance when either GP type completes. What is the motivation behind this? When most callbacks don't have much latency requirements between queue and invocation? Thanks. -- Frederic Weisbecker SUSE Labs