From: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ring-buffer: Fix subbuf_ids memory leak in rb_allocate_cpu_buffer() error path
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 09:13:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <amsHlMCNHV9JWA0l@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <178539491147.180138.1181424244288838594.stgit@devnote2>
On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 04:01:51PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
>
> In rb_allocate_cpu_buffer(), cpu_buffer->subbuf_ids is allocated using
> kcalloc() when buffer->remote is non-NULL. If a subsequent page allocation
> fails (e.g., ring_buffer_desc_page() returns NULL or rb_allocate_pages()
> fails), execution jumps to fail_free_reader.
>
> While __free(kfree) automatically frees the outer cpu_buffer structure
> at scope exit, kfree(cpu_buffer) does not recursively free nested heap
> pointers such as cpu_buffer->subbuf_ids, resulting in a memory leak.
>
> Fix this by explicitly freeing cpu_buffer->subbuf_ids in the
> fail_free_reader error unwinding path when cpu_buffer->remote is set.
>
> Fixes: 2e67fabd8b77 ("ring-buffer: Introduce ring-buffer remotes")
> Assisted-by: Antigravity:gemini-3.6-flash
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> ---
> kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> index 78d3875a47a5..03f6baf6a5f5 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> @@ -2599,6 +2599,8 @@ rb_allocate_cpu_buffer(struct trace_buffer *buffer, long nr_pages, int cpu)
> return_ptr(cpu_buffer);
>
> fail_free_reader:
> + if (cpu_buffer->remote)
> + kfree(cpu_buffer->subbuf_ids);
alloc_cpu_buffer() being kzalloc, I suppose here we could just unconditionally
call kfree(cpu_buffer->subbuf_ids) ?
> free_buffer_page(cpu_buffer->reader_page);
>
> return NULL;
>
--
Vincent
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-30 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-30 7:01 [PATCH] ring-buffer: Fix subbuf_ids memory leak in rb_allocate_cpu_buffer() error path Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-07-30 8:13 ` Vincent Donnefort [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=amsHlMCNHV9JWA0l@google.com \
--to=vdonnefort@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox