From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D456E13E020; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 13:53:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721829216; cv=none; b=Rv0Kp+InsbzBKLBu2jjtRL8k1OcREHL4Ps0hGnqAqa8NN5Z2xdK1vWK/GbM09zJATconytTYWTr9uYL73vczPY5hh2XIGuLurfbXl9mTK1Yjhd4Nwf5YF+bSP2ndZNCn5sp1ZRe5Wc3xteO1r+V/dMDI7gxPhJAvHXN/WOiQyZ0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721829216; c=relaxed/simple; bh=07Vzl6re9ZHoHnUQaqXa2n0Sm3JNDNE/aQbliYyNUPE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=tSSzTIBDxdv0JLtBfh0RrFv+uy+NmG1dIcNFaej0eDwcxijtjKZINehLVWPm7sCdlSNsoSfv3hCj2pbUK1/QG83S9OeroYJ032d2MMwcqucsTlIq+EnuvPJ9v+IMC71o5ZXIxlDNbvlVTWO8y48uEycbC9LvRviM0O2ZagUqHrM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=WAP2//Vl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="WAP2//Vl" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B0F7C32781; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 13:53:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1721829215; bh=07Vzl6re9ZHoHnUQaqXa2n0Sm3JNDNE/aQbliYyNUPE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=WAP2//VlWUSM9jrjWrTnlUR5U9gfJcKWxfEehwSsgCifqJ1HhI5rmor2MgAYiE7Hj k3H3D8gUK01HrebDYiJ8EV56b+RO+InO4F1HL2zNXYqpPk0VVAstDY9HBgwUy8+jTo 8Kp+cbZnfcsDTxUnkpS1wiQgO6T2KXSlCCZwyOB4EAFefvi0zRPKDPVqPNBGFqV5Kn m54HgAjJfy8we9Y9tl7LY7L4gaHz6KkuEz0NmtF8JUJfXUWPMHmL6c8XZgfCklah1Y U/SwoGTJa9N4jZ4SGcPsHczOthJTxHkGyBSbyg3+L/BrGVV8TCmbKAOKTgYYxrZSSF Ywifo4pkBnatw== Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A535FCE0A6E; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 06:53:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 06:53:34 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Uladzislau Rezki , "Jason A. Donenfeld" , Jakub Kicinski , Julia Lawall , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux.dev, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mathieu Desnoyers , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "Naveen N. Rao" , Christophe Leroy , Nicholas Piggin , netdev@vger.kernel.org, wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, Neil Brown , Olga Kornievskaia , Dai Ngo , Tom Talpey , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-can@vger.kernel.org, Lai Jiangshan , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, kasan-dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] replace call_rcu by kfree_rcu for simple kmem_cache_free callback Message-ID: Reply-To: paulmck@kernel.org References: <6711935d-20b5-41c1-8864-db3fc7d7823d@suse.cz> <36c60acd-543e-48c5-8bd2-6ed509972d28@suse.cz> <5c8b2883-962f-431f-b2d3-3632755de3b0@paulmck-laptop> <9967fdfa-e649-456d-a0cb-b4c4bf7f9d68@suse.cz> <6dad6e9f-e0ca-4446-be9c-1be25b2536dd@paulmck-laptop> <4cba4a48-902b-4fb6-895c-c8e6b64e0d5f@suse.cz> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 10:39:38PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 6/21/24 11:32 AM, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 11:28:13AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > One question. Maybe it is already late but it is better to ask rather than not. > > > > What do you think if we have a small discussion about it on the LPC 2024 as a > > topic? It might be it is already late or a schedule is set by now. Or we fix > > it by a conference time. > > > > Just a thought. > > Sorry for the late reply. The MM MC turned out to be so packed I didn't even > propose a slab topic. We could discuss in hallway track or a BOF, but > hopefully if the current direction taken by my RFC brings no unexpected > surprise, and the necessary RCU barrier side is also feasible, this will be > settled by time of plumbers. That would be even better! Thanx, Paul