From: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] Documentation: tracing: Update fprobe event example with BTF field
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 23:53:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b65f6a0f-772c-162c-6669-ff1d545f375c@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <168960748753.34107.1941635032108706544.stgit@devnote2>
On 17/07/2023 16:24, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
>
> Update fprobe event example with BTF data structure field specification.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
One suggestion below, but
Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Remove 'retval' and use '$retval'.
> ---
> Documentation/trace/fprobetrace.rst | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/trace/fprobetrace.rst b/Documentation/trace/fprobetrace.rst
> index 7297f9478459..e9e764fadf14 100644
> --- a/Documentation/trace/fprobetrace.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/trace/fprobetrace.rst
> @@ -79,9 +79,9 @@ automatically set by the given name. ::
> f:fprobes/myprobe vfs_read count=count pos=pos
>
> It also chooses the fetch type from BTF information. For example, in the above
> -example, the ``count`` is unsigned long, and the ``pos`` is a pointer. Thus, both
> -are converted to 64bit unsigned long, but only ``pos`` has "%Lx" print-format as
> -below ::
> +example, the ``count`` is unsigned long, and the ``pos`` is a pointer. Thus,
> +both are converted to 64bit unsigned long, but only ``pos`` has "%Lx"
> +print-format as below ::
>
> # cat events/fprobes/myprobe/format
> name: myprobe
> @@ -105,9 +105,33 @@ is expanded to all function arguments of the function or the tracepoint. ::
> # cat dynamic_events
> f:fprobes/myprobe vfs_read file=file buf=buf count=count pos=pos
>
> -BTF also affects the ``$retval``. If user doesn't set any type, the retval type is
> -automatically picked from the BTF. If the function returns ``void``, ``$retval``
> -is rejected.
> +BTF also affects the ``$retval``. If user doesn't set any type, the retval
> +type is automatically picked from the BTF. If the function returns ``void``,
> +``$retval`` is rejected.
> +
> +You can access the data fields of a data structure using allow operator ``->``
> +(for pointer type) and dot operator ``.`` (for data structure type.)::
> +
> +# echo 't sched_switch preempt prev_pid=prev->pid next_pid=next->pid' >> dynamic_events
> +
Could you describe what field access combinations are supported here;
i.e. foo->bar[.baz]?
> +This data field access is available for the return value via ``$retval``,
> +e.g. ``$retval->name``.
> +
> +For these BTF arguments and fields, ``:string`` and ``:ustring`` change the
> +behavior. If these are used for BTF argument or field, it checks whether
> +the BTF type of the argument or the data field is ``char *`` or ``char []``,
> +or not. If not, it rejects applying the string types. Also, with the BTF
> +support, you don't need a memory dereference operator (``+0(PTR)``) for
> +accessing the string pointed by a ``PTR``. It automatically adds the memory
> +dereference operator according to the BTF type. e.g. ::
> +
> +# echo 't sched_switch prev->comm:string' >> dynamic_events
> +# echo 'f getname_flags%return $retval->name:string' >> dynamic_events
> +
> +The ``prev->comm`` is an embedded char array in the data structure, and
> +``$retval->name`` is a char pointer in the data structure. But in both
> +cases, you can use ``:string`` type to get the string.
> +
>
> Usage examples
> --------------
> @@ -161,10 +185,10 @@ parameters. This means you can access any field values in the task
> structure pointed by the ``prev`` and ``next`` arguments.
>
> For example, usually ``task_struct::start_time`` is not traced, but with this
> -traceprobe event, you can trace it as below.
> +traceprobe event, you can trace that field as below.
> ::
>
> - # echo 't sched_switch comm=+1896(next):string start_time=+1728(next):u64' > dynamic_events
> + # echo 't sched_switch comm=next->comm:string next->start_time' > dynamic_events
> # head -n 20 trace | tail
> # TASK-PID CPU# ||||| TIMESTAMP FUNCTION
> # | | | ||||| | |
> @@ -176,13 +200,3 @@ traceprobe event, you can trace it as below.
> <idle>-0 [000] d..3. 5606.690317: sched_switch: (__probestub_sched_switch+0x4/0x10) comm="kworker/0:1" usage=1 start_time=137000000
> kworker/0:1-14 [000] d..3. 5606.690339: sched_switch: (__probestub_sched_switch+0x4/0x10) comm="swapper/0" usage=2 start_time=0
> <idle>-0 [000] d..3. 5606.692368: sched_switch: (__probestub_sched_switch+0x4/0x10) comm="kworker/0:1" usage=1 start_time=137000000
> -
> -Currently, to find the offset of a specific field in the data structure,
> -you need to build kernel with debuginfo and run `perf probe` command with
> -`-D` option. e.g.
> -::
> -
> - # perf probe -D "__probestub_sched_switch next->comm:string next->start_time"
> - p:probe/__probestub_sched_switch __probestub_sched_switch+0 comm=+1896(%cx):string start_time=+1728(%cx):u64
> -
> -And replace the ``%cx`` with the ``next``.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-20 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-17 15:23 [PATCH v2 0/9] tracing: Improbe BTF support on probe events Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-07-17 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] tracing/probes: Fix to add NULL check for BTF APIs Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-07-17 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] bpf/btf: tracing: Move finding func-proto API and getting func-param API to BTF Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-07-17 18:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-07-17 23:46 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-07-17 23:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-07-18 1:02 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-07-17 23:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-07-18 1:03 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-07-18 2:40 ` Donglin Peng
2023-07-18 10:44 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-07-18 13:56 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-07-18 17:11 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-07-18 23:03 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-07-18 23:12 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-07-19 15:17 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-07-19 2:09 ` Donglin Peng
2023-07-19 15:15 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-07-19 12:36 ` Alan Maguire
2023-07-19 15:24 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-07-19 15:49 ` Alan Maguire
2023-07-17 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] bpf/btf: Add a function to search a member of a struct/union Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-07-20 22:34 ` Alan Maguire
2023-07-21 14:22 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-07-17 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] tracing/probes: Support BTF based data structure field access Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-07-20 22:51 ` Alan Maguire
2023-07-21 14:22 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-07-17 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] tracing/probes: Support BTF field access from $retval Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-07-17 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] tracing/probes: Add string type check with BTF Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-07-17 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] tracing/fprobe-event: Assume fprobe is a return event by $retval Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-07-17 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] selftests/ftrace: Add BTF fields access testcases Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-07-20 23:00 ` Alan Maguire
2023-07-21 1:42 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-07-17 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] Documentation: tracing: Update fprobe event example with BTF field Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-07-20 22:53 ` Alan Maguire [this message]
2023-07-21 13:58 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-07-19 9:02 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] tracing: Improbe BTF support on probe events Alan Maguire
2023-07-19 16:01 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-07-20 21:50 ` Alan Maguire
2023-07-25 23:45 ` Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b65f6a0f-772c-162c-6669-ff1d545f375c@oracle.com \
--to=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).