From: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
To: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rv/rtapp/wakeup: Use "rv_this" the rv_monitor variable
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2026 08:31:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e6f78faca93f92981130621d712ac05374d83b05.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001044218.3508990-1-namcao@linutronix.de>
On Thu, 2026-10-01 at 06:42 +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> Commit d9e4c61a12dd ("rv: Use generic rv_this for the rv_monitor
> variable in LTL") renamed the rv_monitor variable to rv_this. But
> rtapp/wakeup monitor was late to the party and missed that.
>
> So for this monitor, rv_this is an empty struct. The reactor fails to
> work, because rv_react() checks monitor->react and sees NULL.
>
> Correct to "rv_this" and make the reactor work again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
Damn.. Thanks for noticing!
That's a weird one, I cannot think of a way to only declare the rv_this, so the
compiler is perfectly happy to give you the empty one..
I'm taking this, but I believe it deserves the Fixes tag. What do you think?
Thanks,
Gabriele
> ---
> kernel/trace/rv/monitors/wakeup/wakeup.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/rv/monitors/wakeup/wakeup.c
> b/kernel/trace/rv/monitors/wakeup/wakeup.c
> index 01b47416f24e..2e803e79181e 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/rv/monitors/wakeup/wakeup.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/rv/monitors/wakeup/wakeup.c
> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static void disable_wakeup(void)
> ltl_monitor_destroy();
> }
>
> -static struct rv_monitor rv_wakeup = {
> +static struct rv_monitor rv_this = {
> .name = "wakeup",
> .description = "Monitor that real-time tasks are not woken by lower-
> priority tasks",
> .enable = enable_wakeup,
> @@ -137,12 +137,12 @@ static struct rv_monitor rv_wakeup = {
>
> static int __init register_wakeup(void)
> {
> - return rv_register_monitor(&rv_wakeup, &rv_rtapp);
> + return rv_register_monitor(&rv_this, &rv_rtapp);
> }
>
> static void __exit unregister_wakeup(void)
> {
> - rv_unregister_monitor(&rv_wakeup);
> + rv_unregister_monitor(&rv_this);
> }
>
> module_init(register_wakeup);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-01 6:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-01 4:42 [PATCH] rv/rtapp/wakeup: Use "rv_this" the rv_monitor variable Nam Cao
2026-10-01 6:31 ` Gabriele Monaco [this message]
2026-10-01 11:17 ` Gabriele Monaco
2026-10-02 15:33 ` Nam Cao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e6f78faca93f92981130621d712ac05374d83b05.camel@redhat.com \
--to=gmonaco@redhat.com \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namcao@linutronix.de \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox