From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>,
axboe@kernel.dk, rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
Cc: johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com, kch@nvidia.com, bvanassche@acm.org,
ritesh.list@gmail.com, neelx@suse.com, sean@ashe.io,
mproche@gmail.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: add tracepoint block_rq_tag_wait
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 08:38:20 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e7db667e-2662-4ad9-89cd-309c457ce17e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260317182835.258183-1-atomlin@atomlin.com>
On 2026/03/18 3:28, Aaron Tomlin wrote:
> In high-performance storage environments, particularly when utilising
> RAID controllers with shared tag sets (BLK_MQ_F_TAG_HCTX_SHARED), severe
> latency spikes can occur when fast devices (SSDs) are starved of hardware
> tags when sharing the same blk_mq_tag_set.
>
> Currently, diagnosing this specific hardware queue contention is
> difficult. When a CPU thread exhausts the tag pool, blk_mq_get_tag()
> forces the current thread to block uninterruptible via io_schedule().
> While this can be inferred via sched:sched_switch or dynamically
> traced by attaching a kprobe to blk_mq_mark_tag_wait(), there is no
> dedicated, out-of-the-box observability for this event.
>
> This patch introduces the block_rq_tag_wait static tracepoint in
> the tag allocation slow-path. It triggers immediately before the
> thread yields the CPU, exposing the exact hardware context (hctx)
> that is starved, the total pool size, and the current active request
> count.
>
> This provides storage engineers and performance monitoring agents
> with a zero-configuration, low-overhead mechanism to definitively
> identify shared-tag bottlenecks and tune I/O schedulers or cgroup
> throttling accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>
Looks OK to me, but I have some suggestions below.
> ---
> block/blk-mq-tag.c | 3 +++
> include/trace/events/block.h | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> index 33946cdb5716..f50993e86ca5 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #include <linux/kmemleak.h>
>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <trace/events/block.h>
> #include "blk.h"
> #include "blk-mq.h"
> #include "blk-mq-sched.h"
> @@ -187,6 +188,8 @@ unsigned int blk_mq_get_tag(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data)
> if (tag != BLK_MQ_NO_TAG)
> break;
>
> + trace_block_rq_tag_wait(data->q, data->hctx);
> +
> bt_prev = bt;
> io_schedule();
>
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/block.h b/include/trace/events/block.h
> index 6aa79e2d799c..48e2ba433c87 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/block.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/block.h
> @@ -226,6 +226,42 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(block_rq,
> IOPRIO_PRIO_LEVEL(__entry->ioprio), __entry->comm)
> );
>
> +/**
> + * block_rq_tag_wait - triggered when an I/O request is starved of a tag
when an I/O request -> when a request
> + * @q: queue containing the request
request queue of the target device
("containing" is odd here)
> + * @hctx: hardware context (queue) experiencing starvation
hardware context of the request
> + *
> + * Called immediately before the submitting thread is forced to block due
the submitting thread -> the submitting context
> + * to the exhaustion of available hardware tags. This tracepoint indicates
s/tracepoint/trace point
> + * that the thread will be placed into an uninterruptible state via
s/thread/context
> + * io_schedule() until an active block I/O operation completes and
> + * relinquishes its assigned tag.
until an active request completes
(BIOs do not have tags).
> + */
> +TRACE_EVENT(block_rq_tag_wait,
> +
> + TP_PROTO(struct request_queue *q, struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx),
> +
> + TP_ARGS(q, hctx),
> +
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __field( dev_t, dev )
> + __field( u32, hctx_id )
> + __field( u32, nr_tags )
> + __field( u32, active_requests )
> + ),
> +
> + TP_fast_assign(
> + __entry->dev = q->disk ? disk_devt(q->disk) : 0;
I do not think that q->disk can ever be NULL when there is a request being
submitted.
> + __entry->hctx_id = hctx ? hctx->queue_num : 0;
> + __entry->nr_tags = hctx && hctx->tags ? hctx->tags->nr_tags : 0;
> + __entry->active_requests = hctx ? atomic_read(&hctx->nr_active) : 0;
> + ),
> +
> + TP_printk("%d,%d hctx=%u starved (active=%u/%u)",
> + MAJOR(__entry->dev), MINOR(__entry->dev),
> + __entry->hctx_id, __entry->active_requests, __entry->nr_tags)
> +);
> +
> /**
> * block_rq_insert - insert block operation request into queue
> * @rq: block IO operation request
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-17 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-17 18:28 [PATCH] blk-mq: add tracepoint block_rq_tag_wait Aaron Tomlin
2026-03-17 23:38 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2026-03-18 13:10 ` Laurence Oberman
2026-03-18 13:21 ` Aaron Tomlin
2026-03-19 0:22 ` Aaron Tomlin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e7db667e-2662-4ad9-89cd-309c457ce17e@kernel.org \
--to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=atomlin@atomlin.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mproche@gmail.com \
--cc=neelx@suse.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sean@ashe.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox