From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rcu v2] 4/5] rcu-tasks: Move RCU Tasks self-tests to core_initcall()
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 03:51:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff2ed5ba-52f4-4e82-ac0c-6e6a7013d86e@paulmck-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250204102611.OVuHn9rS@linutronix.de>
On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 11:26:11AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2025-01-30 10:53:19 [-0800], Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > The timer and hrtimer softirq processing has moved to dedicated threads
> > for kernels built with CONFIG_IRQ_FORCED_THREADING=y. This results in
> > timers not expiring until later in early boot, which in turn causes the
> > RCU Tasks self-tests to hang in kernels built with CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=y,
> > which further causes the entire kernel to hang. One fix would be to
> > make timers work during this time, but there are no known users of RCU
> > Tasks grace periods during that time, so no justification for the added
> > complexity. Not yet, anyway.
> >
> > This commit therefore moves the call to rcu_init_tasks_generic() from
> > kernel_init_freeable() to a core_initcall(). This works because the
> > timer and hrtimer kthreads are created at early_initcall() time.
>
> Fixes: 49a17639508c3 ("softirq: Use a dedicated thread for timer wakeups on PREEMPT_RT.")
> ?
Quite possibly... I freely confess that I was more focused on the fix
than on the bug's origin. Would you be willing to try this commit and
its predecessor?
> I played with it and I can reproduce the issue with !RT + threadirqs but
> not with RT (which implies threadirqs).
> Is there anything in RT that avoids the problem?
Not that I know of, but then again I did not try it. To your point,
I do need to make a -rt rcutorture scenario. TREE03 has been intended to
approximate this, and it uses the following Kconfig options:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFIG_SMP=y
CONFIG_NR_CPUS=16
CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=n
CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=n
CONFIG_PREEMPT=y
#CHECK#CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y
CONFIG_HZ_PERIODIC=y
CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE=n
CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=n
CONFIG_RCU_TRACE=y
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=y
CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT=2
CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF=2
CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU=n
CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=n
CONFIG_RCU_BOOST=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD=n
CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT=y
------------------------------------------------------------------------
And the following kernel-boot parameters:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
rcutorture.onoff_interval=200 rcutorture.onoff_holdoff=30
rcutree.gp_preinit_delay=12
rcutree.gp_init_delay=3
rcutree.gp_cleanup_delay=3
rcutree.kthread_prio=2
threadirqs
rcutree.use_softirq=0
rcutorture.preempt_duration=10
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Some of these are for RCU's benefit, but what should I change to more
closely approximate a typical real-time deployment?
> Thank you for debugging and the patch.
And to you for digging into it!
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-04 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <43f70961-1884-42bf-b303-1d33665d99d2@paulmck-laptop>
2025-01-30 18:53 ` [PATCH rcu v2] 4/5] rcu-tasks: Move RCU Tasks self-tests to core_initcall() Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-04 10:26 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-04 11:51 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2025-02-04 16:34 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-04 20:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-05 14:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-05 19:54 ` John Ogness
2025-02-05 20:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-05 20:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-05 21:22 ` John Ogness
2025-02-05 21:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-05 22:20 ` John Ogness
2025-02-05 22:31 ` John Ogness
2025-02-05 23:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-06 8:28 ` John Ogness
2025-02-06 9:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-06 9:02 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-06 9:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-06 10:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-06 11:06 ` Petr Mladek
2025-02-06 16:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ff2ed5ba-52f4-4e82-ac0c-6e6a7013d86e@paulmck-laptop \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox