From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Lee Jones" <lee@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/histograms: Reject non-stacktrace fields for synthetic stacktrace fields
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 16:13:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-168379@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261012155805.1103972-1-lee@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] tracing: check_synth_field regression for __bitmask and stacktraces
- [High] tracing: arbitrary memory read via scalar to string synthetic field mapping
--
commit 4813d717e995df13871068dd6fd996711ca8965d
Author: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
tracing/histograms: Reject non-stacktrace fields for synthetic stacktrace fields
In check_synth_field(), when a synthetic event field is a stacktrace
and the histogram field is not a "long[" stacktrace array, validation falls
through to the generic size and signedness comparison. This allows any
8-byte signed scalar histogram field to pass the fallback check and be
dereferenced as a kernel stacktrace pointer. This commit attempts to reject
these mismatches by enforcing that field->is_stack matches the "long[" type.
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> index 8af97fd4ee2d5..b09f5043e1543 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> @@ -3946,7 +3946,10 @@ static int check_synth_field(struct synth_event *event,
> && field->is_dynamic)
> return 0;
>
> - if (strstr(hist_field->type, "long[") && field->is_stack)
> + if (!!strstr(hist_field->type, "long[") != field->is_stack)
> + return -EINVAL;
[Severity: High]
Does this heuristic falsely match the long[ substring in __data_loc unsigned
long[] from __bitmask and __cpumask fields?
If is_stack == false, this logic seems to falsely reject valid mappings.
If is_stack == true, this appears to bypass validation and allow a 32-bit
__data_loc integer to be passed as the field value. Could this 32-bit integer
then be cast to a pointer and dereferenced in
trace_events_synth.c:get_field_size() and trace_stack(), potentially causing
a kernel panic?
> +
> + if (field->is_stack)
> return 0;
>
> if (strcmp(field->type, hist_field->type) != 0) {
> if (field->size != hist_field->size ||
> (!field->is_string && field->is_signed != hist_field->is_signed))
> return -EINVAL;
> }
[Severity: High]
It looks like this fallback logic fails to reject a scalar-to-string mapping.
When creating a dynamic string synthetic field, its size is set to sizeof(u64)
and is_string is true. Because field->size equals hist_field->size (8 bytes)
and !field->is_string short-circuits the type/signedness check, will an 8-byte
scalar successfully map to a dynamic string?
If an attacker-controlled scalar is passed, can it be cast to a kernel pointer
in trace_events_synth.c:trace_string() and used with fetch_store_strlen() to
arbitrarily read kernel memory?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261012155805.1103972-1-lee@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-12 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-12 15:58 [PATCH] tracing/histograms: Reject non-stacktrace fields for synthetic stacktrace fields Lee Jones
2026-10-12 16:13 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-13 9:19 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-168379@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox