From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Leon Hwang" <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/21] bpf: Add bpf_trampoline_multi_prog_attach/detach()
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 16:16:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-168381@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261012154024.29423-10-leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] bpf: Use-After-Free of trampoline images when text poke batch fails in detach
--
commit 357aa776c5f19ab7b39da8fb3843fb0141fc3b7f
Author: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
bpf: Add bpf_trampoline_multi_prog_attach/detach()
This commit introduces multi-attach and detach helpers for BPF trampolines.
These helpers prepare target trampolines, apply text pokes in batch, and
commit the staged trampoline images.
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
> --- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
[ ... ]
> +static void bpf_trampoline_multi_prog_rollback(struct bpf_trampoline *tr)
> +{
> + if (tr->multi_attach.new_image)
> + bpf_tramp_image_put(tr->multi_attach.new_image);
> +
> + tr->flags = tr->multi_attach.old_flags;
> + tr->multi_attach.old_image = NULL;
[Severity: Critical]
If __bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog() fails and calls
bpf_trampoline_multi_prog_rollback(), old_image is cleared for the node.
Does this guarantee that a subsequent bpf_text_poke_batch() will fail
due to a NOP expectation mismatch?
> + tr->multi_attach.new_image = NULL;
> + tr->multi_attach.old_flags = 0;
> +}
[ ... ]
> +void bpf_trampoline_multi_prog_detach(struct bpf_tracing_multi_link *link)
> +{
> + struct bpf_tracing_multi_node *mnode;
> + int i, err;
> +
> + trampoline_lock_all();
> +
> + for_each_mnode(mnode, link) {
> + bpf_trampoline_multi_attach_init(mnode->trampoline);
> + err = __bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(&mnode->node, mnode->trampoline, NULL,
> + &trampoline_multi_prog_ops, NULL);
> + if (WARN_ONCE(err, "__bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog failed: %d\n", err))
> + bpf_trampoline_multi_prog_rollback(mnode->trampoline);
> + }
> +
> + for_each_mnode(mnode, link) {
> + link->pokes[i] = &mnode->poke;
> + bpf_text_poke_init(link->pokes[i], mnode->trampoline);
> + }
> +
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(bpf_text_poke_batch(link->pokes, link->nodes_cnt));
[Severity: Critical]
If bpf_text_poke_batch() fails here (for example, due to a hardware or memory
error during patching, or a NOP mismatch from a prior unlink failure), the
failure is wrapped in WARN_ON_ONCE but otherwise ignored.
The code then proceeds to unconditionally call
bpf_trampoline_multi_prog_commit() for all nodes, which frees old_image
via bpf_tramp_image_put().
Since the kernel text remains unmodified after a failed poke batch, it will
continue to jump to the freed old_image. Can this lead to a use-after-free
on traced paths?
> +
> + for_each_mnode(mnode, link)
> + bpf_trampoline_multi_prog_commit(mnode->trampoline);
> +
> + trampoline_unlock_all();
> +
> + for_each_mnode(mnode, link)
> + bpf_trampoline_put(mnode->trampoline);
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261012154024.29423-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev?part=9
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-12 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-12 15:40 [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/21] bpf: Add tracing_multi link support for bpf progs Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/21] bpf: Initialize ftrace_managed in bpf_trampoline_get() Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/21] bpf: Drop unnecessary ftrace_location() in register/unregister/modify_fentry_multi() Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/21] bpf, x86: Factor out bpf_arch_text_poke_prepare_insns() helper on x86_64 Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/21] bpf, x86: Factor out bpf_arch_text_poke_check_ip() " Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/21] bpf, x86: Introduce bpf_arch_text_poke_batch() " Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/21] bpf: Add bpf_text_poke_batch() helper in trampoline Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 16:11 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/21] bpf: Check tgt_prog before is_tracing_multi_id() in verifier Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 08/21] bpf: Move helpers out of CONFIG_HAVE_SINGLE_FTRACE_DIRECT_OPS guard in trampoline Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 16:11 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/21] bpf: Add bpf_trampoline_multi_prog_attach/detach() Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 16:16 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-12 16:33 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/21] bpf: Shrink CONFIG_HAVE_SINGLE_FTRACE_DIRECT_OPS guard scope for bpf_tracing_multi_attach() Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/21] bpf: Add tracing_multi link support for bpf progs Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 16:33 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 12/21] libbpf: " Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 13/21] bpf: Add tracing_multi link fdinfo " Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 14/21] bpf: Add tracing_multi link info " Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 16:33 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-12 16:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 15/21] selftests/bpf: Add tracing_multi bpf prog attach test Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 16/21] selftests/bpf: Add tracing_multi bpf prog attach failure tests Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 17/21] selftests/bpf: Add tracing_multi bpf prog cookie test Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 18/21] selftests/bpf: Add tracing_multi bpf prog rollback test Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 16:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 19/21] selftests/bpf: Add tracing_multi bpf prog link info test Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 16:11 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-12 16:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 20/21] selftests/bpf: Test tailcall with fentry.multi Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 15:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 21/21] selftests/bpf: Benchmark tracing_multi bpf progs attachment Leon Hwang
2026-10-12 16:33 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-12 16:52 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-168381@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox