From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hao Ge" <hao.ge@linux.dev>
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tracing: Fix crash in print_graph_function_event()
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 08:14:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-172455@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261015080351.121316-1-hao.ge@linux.dev>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] trace: Transient NULL pointer deref in tracing_set_tracer() due to non-atomic update
--
commit 8e34d0e2d1517b818cf24f9067ddfaa0e4b47cd2
Author: Hao Ge <hao.ge@linux.dev>
tracing: Fix crash in print_graph_function_event()
This commit attempts to fix a NULL pointer dereference in
print_graph_function_event() by ensuring tr->current_trace_flags is never
NULL. It provides a fallback to a static empty no_tracer_flags when a
selected tracer has no flags defined.
v1 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260920042139.70736-1-hao.ge@linux.dev/
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> index e4a490d3d08c8..fba9521d25115 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1319,6 +1325,8 @@ static int run_tracer_selftest(struct tracer *type)
>
> tr->current_trace = type;
> tr->current_trace_flags = type->flags ? : type->default_flags;
> + if (!tr->current_trace_flags)
> + tr->current_trace_flags = &no_tracer_flags;
[Severity: High]
Does this non-atomic double assignment expose a transient NULL pointer to
concurrent lockless readers?
A concurrent reader might fetch tr->current_trace_flags during the brief
window between the first store (which writes NULL if the tracer lacks flags)
and the second store.
Could we compute the new flags pointer into a local variable first, and then
assign it to tr->current_trace_flags in a single store, perhaps using
WRITE_ONCE()?
[ ... ]
> @@ -5090,6 +5098,8 @@ int tracing_set_tracer(struct trace_array *tr, const char *buf)
> }
>
> tr->current_trace_flags = t->flags ? : t->tracer->flags;
> + if (!tr->current_trace_flags)
> + tr->current_trace_flags = &no_tracer_flags;
[Severity: High]
Can this similarly result in a regression with a transient NULL pointer
dereference?
While tracing_set_tracer() holds trace_types_lock, readers accessing the
trace file (via seq_read() -> s_show() -> print_trace_line() ->
print_graph_function_event()) iterate locklessly.
If a concurrent reader observes the intermediate NULL value, it will
dereference it (e.g., tr->current_trace_flags->val), leading to the exact
kernel panic this patch is meant to fix.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261015080351.121316-1-hao.ge@linux.dev?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-15 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-15 8:03 [PATCH v2] tracing: Fix crash in print_graph_function_event() Hao Ge
2026-10-15 8:14 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-172455@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=hao.ge@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox