From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Wenwu Hou" <hwenwur@gmail.com>, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/hwlat: Bind the sampler kthread instead of setting its affinity
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 02:54:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-208125@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261111020755.1422284-1-hwenwur@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Medium] tracing/hwlat: start_single_kthread() leaves
PF_NO_SETAFFINITY set on hwlatd
--
commit 649d99e25afc0a134fd743f085f8409aa8adb366
Author: Wenwu Hou <hwenwur@gmail.com>
tracing/hwlat: Bind the sampler kthread instead of setting its affinity
This commit replaces set_cpus_allowed_ptr() with kthread_bind_mask() in
start_single_kthread() and validates that tracing_cpumask overlaps with
cpu_online_mask before creating the hwlatd kthread.
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c b/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
> index 3fe274b84f1c2..65e184d800ff1 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
> @@ -440,7 +437,14 @@ static int start_single_kthread(struct trace_array *tr)
>
> }
>
> - set_cpus_allowed_ptr(kthread, current_mask);
> + kthread = kthread_create(kthread_fn, NULL, "hwlatd");
> + if (IS_ERR(kthread)) {
> + pr_err(BANNER "could not start sampling thread\n");
> + cpus_read_unlock();
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + kthread_bind_mask(kthread, current_mask);
[Severity: Medium]
Does leaving PF_NO_SETAFFINITY set on hwlatd prevent userspace from
changing its CPU affinity or moving it into a cgroup?
kthread_bind_mask() sets PF_NO_SETAFFINITY, which kthread() only checks on
initial wake-up before calling kthread_fn(). Because kthread_fn() never
clears the flag, sched_setaffinity() and cgroup_attach_permissions()
reject hwlatd with -EINVAL in both round-robin and none modes. That also
makes the user-affinity override check in move_to_next_cpu() unreachable
from sched_setaffinity():
kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:move_to_next_cpu() {
/*
* If for some reason the user modifies the CPU affinity
* of this thread, then stop migrating for the duration
* of the current test.
*/
if (!cpumask_equal(current_mask, current->cpus_ptr))
goto change_mode;
...
}
Clearing PF_NO_SETAFFINITY in kthread_fn() once the thread has started, as
done in 4998e7fda149 ("tracing/osnoise: Switch from PF_NO_SETAFFINITY to
migrate_disable"), would avoid this regression while still skipping
kthread_affine_node() on the initial wake-up.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261111020755.1422284-1-hwenwur@gmail.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 2:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-11 2:07 [PATCH] tracing/hwlat: Bind the sampler kthread instead of setting its affinity Wenwu Hou
2026-11-11 2:54 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-208125@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=hwenwur@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox