Linux Trace Kernel
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Wenwu Hou" <hwenwur@gmail.com>, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/hwlat: Bind the sampler kthread instead of setting its affinity
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 02:54:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-208125@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261111020755.1422284-1-hwenwur@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Medium] tracing/hwlat: start_single_kthread() leaves
  PF_NO_SETAFFINITY set on hwlatd
--

commit 649d99e25afc0a134fd743f085f8409aa8adb366
Author: Wenwu Hou <hwenwur@gmail.com>

tracing/hwlat: Bind the sampler kthread instead of setting its affinity

This commit replaces set_cpus_allowed_ptr() with kthread_bind_mask() in
start_single_kthread() and validates that tracing_cpumask overlaps with
cpu_online_mask before creating the hwlatd kthread.

> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c b/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
> index 3fe274b84f1c2..65e184d800ff1 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
> @@ -440,7 +437,14 @@ static int start_single_kthread(struct trace_array *tr)
>  
>  	}
>  
> -	set_cpus_allowed_ptr(kthread, current_mask);
> +	kthread = kthread_create(kthread_fn, NULL, "hwlatd");
> +	if (IS_ERR(kthread)) {
> +		pr_err(BANNER "could not start sampling thread\n");
> +		cpus_read_unlock();
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	kthread_bind_mask(kthread, current_mask);

[Severity: Medium]
Does leaving PF_NO_SETAFFINITY set on hwlatd prevent userspace from
changing its CPU affinity or moving it into a cgroup?

kthread_bind_mask() sets PF_NO_SETAFFINITY, which kthread() only checks on
initial wake-up before calling kthread_fn().  Because kthread_fn() never
clears the flag, sched_setaffinity() and cgroup_attach_permissions()
reject hwlatd with -EINVAL in both round-robin and none modes.  That also
makes the user-affinity override check in move_to_next_cpu() unreachable
from sched_setaffinity():

kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:move_to_next_cpu() {
	/*
	 * If for some reason the user modifies the CPU affinity
	 * of this thread, then stop migrating for the duration
	 * of the current test.
	 */
	if (!cpumask_equal(current_mask, current->cpus_ptr))
		goto change_mode;
    ...
}

Clearing PF_NO_SETAFFINITY in kthread_fn() once the thread has started, as
done in 4998e7fda149 ("tracing/osnoise: Switch from PF_NO_SETAFFINITY to
migrate_disable"), would avoid this regression while still skipping
kthread_affine_node() on the initial wake-up.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261111020755.1422284-1-hwenwur@gmail.com?part=1

      reply	other threads:[~2026-11-11  2:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-11  2:07 [PATCH] tracing/hwlat: Bind the sampler kthread instead of setting its affinity Wenwu Hou
2026-11-11  2:54 ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-208125@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=hwenwur@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox