From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Vincent Donnefort" <vdonnefort@google.com>,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ring-buffer: Let the reader spin on head page update
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 16:55:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-209343@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261111160624.1294946-1-vdonnefort@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Medium] ring-buffer: stale list.prev dereference in
rb_handle_head_page() writer loop
--
commit 42f758b28dc946f5aa06647c36c046a615ee80cf
Author: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
ring-buffer: Let the reader spin on head page update
This commit introduces the RB_PAGE_HEAD_UPDATE flag to mark newly moved head
page links while a writer update is in progress, converting the final link
to RB_PAGE_HEAD only when the outer writer finishes rb_handle_head_page().
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> index 1fd28a72e6ee1..73f31e6719f98 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -3833,6 +3849,24 @@ rb_handle_head_page(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
> return -1;
> }
>
> + if (type == RB_PAGE_HEAD) {
> + struct buffer_page *prev_page;
> +
> + do {
> + /* Interrupts might have moved the head further */
> + while (!rb_is_head_page(new_head, new_head->list.prev))
> + rb_inc_page(&new_head);
> +
> + prev_page = new_head;
> + rb_dec_page(&prev_page);
> +
> + /* Try to release the reader */
> + ret = rb_head_page_set_head(cpu_buffer, new_head, prev_page,
> + RB_PAGE_HEAD_UPDATE);
> +
> + } while (ret != (RB_PAGE_HEAD_UPDATE));
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
[Severity: Medium]
Can reading new_head->list.prev and rb_dec_page(&prev_page) here inspect a
stale predecessor page and spin in rb_handle_head_page()?
Lockless writers cannot rely on the head page's list.prev pointer because
__rb_get_reader_page() and rb_insert_pages() update the forward list.next
pointer via cmpxchg before updating the following page's list.prev pointer:
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:__rb_get_reader_page() {
...
ret = rb_head_page_replace(reader, cpu_buffer->reader_page);
if (!ret)
goto spin;
...
rb_list_head(reader->list.next)->prev = &cpu_buffer->reader_page->list;
...
}
If a writer enters rb_handle_head_page() in the window after a reader swaps
the head page (or after rb_insert_pages() splices in new pages) but before
list.prev is updated, new_head->list.prev still points to the old predecessor:
CPU0 (reader) CPU1 (writer)
__rb_get_reader_page()
rb_head_page_replace(reader,
cpu_buffer->reader_page)
rb_handle_head_page()
/* tail_page is reader_page->prev,
* next_page is reader_page,
* new_head is reader->next
*/
rb_head_page_set_head_update(...,
new_head, next_page, ...)
rb_head_page_set_normal(...,
next_page, tail_page, ...)
rb_is_head_page(new_head,
new_head->list.prev)
/* inspects reader->list.next
* (RB_PAGE_NORMAL) instead of
* reader_page->list.next
* (RB_PAGE_HEAD_UPDATE)
*/
rb_inc_page(&new_head) <-- misses head
rb_list_head(reader->list.next)->prev =
&cpu_buffer->reader_page->list;
Because every other link in the ring has RB_PAGE_NORMAL, the inner while loop
wraps around the ring buffer until CPU0 updates list.prev, or deadlocks if the
writer is an NMI that interrupted __rb_get_reader_page() or rb_insert_pages()
on the same CPU.
Since new_head starts as the page right after next_page, tracking prev_page
forward from next_page as new_head advances via rb_inc_page() would avoid
touching list.prev on the writer path.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261111160624.1294946-1-vdonnefort@google.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-11 16:06 [PATCH] ring-buffer: Let the reader spin on head page update Vincent Donnefort
2026-11-11 16:55 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-209343@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox