From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Vincent Donnefort" <vdonnefort@google.com>,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/9] ring-buffer: Always read buffer->buffers after testing the cpumask
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 14:22:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-211307@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112141440.3050124-2-vdonnefort@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found no new issues
in this patch, but noticed 1 related pre-existing issue it does not
introduce:
- [High] ring-buffer: atomic counter underflow in ring_buffer_reset()
[1]
--
commit fbf1784e6b7f3202f4d6898704fb8180140b6da5
Author: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
ring-buffer: Always read buffer->buffers after testing the cpumask
This commit moves the load of buffer->buffers[cpu] after the
cpumask_test_cpu() check in ring_buffer_peek(), ring_buffer_reset_cpu(),
and ring_buffer_read_page() to avoid reading a stale per-CPU buffer
pointer when racing with trace_rb_cpu_prepare().
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> index 1fd28a72e6ee1..bd8126f6353b7 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -6740,11 +6742,13 @@ static void reset_disabled_cpu_buffer(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
> */
> void ring_buffer_reset_cpu(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu)
> {
> - struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu];
> + struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer;
>
> if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, buffer->cpumask))
> return;
>
> + cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu];
> +
> /* prevent another thread from changing buffer sizes */
> mutex_lock(&buffer->mutex);
[Severity: High]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but can a concurrent
trace_rb_cpu_prepare() race with ring_buffer_reset() [1] and
underflow cpu_buffer->record_disabled and cpu_buffer->resize_disabled?
Unlike ring_buffer_reset_online_cpus(), which marks each disabled
cpu_buffer with RESET_BIT before sleeping in synchronize_rcu(),
ring_buffer_reset() iterates over buffer->cpumask twice without tracking
which CPUs were disabled in the first loop or holding cpus_read_lock():
CPU0 CPU1
ring_buffer_reset()
for_each_buffer_cpu(buffer, cpu)
atomic_inc(&cpu_buffer->resize_disabled);
atomic_inc(&cpu_buffer->record_disabled);
synchronize_rcu();
trace_rb_cpu_prepare()
rb_allocate_cpu_buffer()
cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, buffer->cpumask);
for_each_buffer_cpu(buffer, cpu)
reset_disabled_cpu_buffer(cpu_buffer);
atomic_dec(&cpu_buffer->record_disabled); <-- underflows to -1
atomic_dec(&cpu_buffer->resize_disabled); <-- underflows to -1
For the newly prepared CPU, reset_disabled_cpu_buffer() runs while
recording is still enabled and both atomic counters underflow from 0 to
-1, corrupting the per-CPU ring buffer state.
[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-2557ac4d-25af-4832-a2c9-c12af32c7a04
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261112141440.3050124-1-vdonnefort@google.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-12 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-12 14:14 [PATCH v1 0/9] ring-buffer: Enable Clang context analysis Vincent Donnefort
2026-11-12 14:14 ` [PATCH v1 1/9] ring-buffer: Always read buffer->buffers after testing the cpumask Vincent Donnefort
2026-11-12 14:22 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-12 14:14 ` [PATCH v1 2/9] ring-buffer: Drop cpus_read_lock() from ring_buffer_poll_remote() Vincent Donnefort
2026-11-12 14:14 ` [PATCH v1 3/9] ring-buffer: Hold buffer->mutex in trace_rb_cpu_prepare() Vincent Donnefort
2026-11-12 14:14 ` [PATCH v1 4/9] tracing: Cache ring_buffer_max_event_size() for trace_marker Vincent Donnefort
2026-11-12 14:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:14 ` [PATCH v1 5/9] ring-buffer: Validate event length against rb_page_capacity() Vincent Donnefort
2026-11-12 14:14 ` [PATCH v1 6/9] ring-buffer: Introduce rb_start_write() and rb_end_write() Vincent Donnefort
2026-11-12 14:14 ` [PATCH v1 7/9] ring-buffer: Avoid reading buffer::subbuf_order on the write path Vincent Donnefort
2026-11-12 14:14 ` [PATCH v1 8/9] ring-buffer: Enable context analysis Vincent Donnefort
2026-11-12 14:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:14 ` [PATCH v1 9/9] ring-buffer: Annotate subbuf_order with __guarded_by(&mutex) Vincent Donnefort
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-211307@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox