From: "roland" <for_spam@gmx.de>
To: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [uml-devel] uml 2.6.0-test9 crash
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:06:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <002101c3b52a$4a42ede0$2000000a@schlepptopp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5.1.0.14.2.20031127102518.02675b90@mail.inboxprotection.com
hi !´
i think , i`m able to crash my uml. :(
i did some stress-testing with my uml-2.6.0-test9 on 2.6.0-test9-skas host and i
unfortunately seem able to crash it very easily.
this was the way i recognized it:
first i executed
while true;do find /;done >/dev/zero &
several times and all worked well.
watched that with "top" inside the uml and found dozens of "finds" sharing the
cpu as expected(spending most of their time on system calls indeed).
on host, cpu usage of uml went to ~99% - all fine so far.
then i thought: mhhhh - ok - eat THIS:
while true;do dd if=/dev/zero of=test.dat bs=1k count=10000;done &
after executing this, my uml got stuck. no output, no response to input - even a
ping to the uml didn`t´give back a sign of life. the uml didn`t crash or panic - it
just gets stuck and unresponsive - uml process remains at 99% on the host.
at a second, third, fourth try, i isolated the problem a little bit:
one or two non looped "dd if=/dev/zero of=test.dat bs=1k count=10000" just are enough
to produce the same result.(under 2.6.0test9-skas-host and ALSO under 2.4.22-99-default
suse9 host, rootfs inside uml is suse9)
is anybody able to reproduce this?
if so - what do do further for analyzing?
i could make the uml downloadable and could send some output from strace (if i attach strace
to the remaining "99% cpu hog", it exits very quickly with a SIGALARM)
maybe an uml bug or even an issue for lkml?
regards
roland
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-27 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <5.1.0.14.2.20031127102518.02675b90@mail.inboxprotection.com>
2003-11-27 21:06 ` roland [this message]
2003-11-27 21:33 ` [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] uml 2.6.0-test9 crash Sven 'Darkman' Michels
2003-11-27 21:54 ` roland
2003-11-27 23:50 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2003-11-28 1:18 ` [uml-devel] bug in COW? - " roland
2003-11-28 1:28 ` [uml-devel] " Erik Walthinsen
2003-11-28 2:11 ` [uml-devel] How to copy COW files to another machine across the network? Shao-Lin Joseph Chung
2003-11-28 8:49 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2003-11-30 21:22 ` roland
2003-11-30 21:37 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2003-11-30 23:31 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-12-01 9:12 ` roland
2003-12-06 0:04 ` [uml-user] " Jeff Dike
2003-12-06 0:05 ` Jeff Dike
2003-11-28 9:13 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-11-29 9:24 ` Richard Potter
2003-12-06 0:05 ` [uml-devel] Re: bug in COW? - Re: [uml-user] uml 2.6.0-test9 crash Jeff Dike
2003-11-28 8:39 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2003-11-28 20:42 ` roland
2003-11-28 21:35 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2003-11-30 2:29 ` roland
2003-11-30 7:47 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2003-11-30 8:23 ` Lynn Kerby
2003-11-30 11:36 ` roland
2003-12-06 0:05 ` Jeff Dike
2003-12-06 9:41 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2003-12-06 18:18 ` Jeff Dike
2003-12-06 23:32 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2003-12-08 1:20 ` roland
2003-12-08 19:21 ` Jeff Dike
2003-12-07 10:53 ` [uml-devel] updating 2.6 to merge 2.4 changes(was: Re: bug in COW? - Re: [uml-user] uml 2.6.0-test9 crash) BlaisorBlade
2003-12-08 20:42 ` Jeff Dike
2003-12-08 21:32 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2003-12-08 23:50 ` Jeff Dike
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='002101c3b52a$4a42ede0$2000000a@schlepptopp' \
--to=for_spam@gmx.de \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox