From: "roland" <for_spam@gmx.de>
To: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net,
Matthew Bloch <matthew@bytemark.co.uk>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] Network lags
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 12:54:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <004801c42533$94d567b0$2000000a@schlepptopp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: c5ot4u$hj5$1@sea.gmane.org
hey,
when the mlock patch doesn`t go into uml officially - why not updating it to the
latest 2.4.x and 2.6.x uml and uploading it to the sourceforge patch section at
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=429&atid=300429 and "maintaining" it
there?
so others could find it, download it, use it, give comments......
regards
roland
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Bloch" <matthew@bytemark.co.uk>
To: <user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: <user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: [uml-user] Network lags
> David Cannings wrote:
> >>>Anyone else who's running lots of UMLs with interactive sessions may have
> >>>noticed the following symptoms which this patch cures:
> >>>
> >>> * irregular ping times to UMLs-- huge delay for the first ping, a few
> >>> normal, a couple of long delays etc.;
> >
> > The huge delay is often related to ARP, a fundamental part of 802.3/true
> > ethernet.
>
> Indeed, but when logging back on to an ssh session etc. it's very
> irritating for customers to find their machine takes seconds to "wake
> up" while the 2.4 kernel swaps stuff back in.
>
> [snip]
> > The problem with "just activating that option" is that many people will do
> > it blindly, unaware of the serious implications it could have to their host.
> > Whilst mlocking an area of memory may not affect you now, or in the next ten
> > minutes, it could cause trouble in three weeks when you start doing
> > something on the host that is memory intensive. In the last three years of
> > running a remote server I have only had to turn up on site to fix it twice.
> > Both were very silly things, one that I'd "just activated" to see what it
> > would do. It cost me a rather expensive journey half way across the country
> > to fix.
>
> Since writing that post back in October, we've deployed the mlock patch
> across two rackfuls of hosts, and we've never had a host kernel "just
> crash" (well we have, but that was down to something else <g>): longest
> uptime on one group of our hosts is 100 days. Yes it was experimental
> but we did a bit of testing first.
>
> From this experience; I would disagree that using lots of mlocked
> memory inherently destabilises the machine. I'm sure it *can* but this
> goes for a lot of things.
>
> [snip]
> > The idea behind UML is to create a separate environment from the host,
> > constructing a UML kernel that can interfere so badly with the host is the
> > total opposite.
>
> It's very easy for a UML kernel to trash the host, and I'm not sure
> anyone knows what "the idea behind UML" is :-)
>
> I can see Jeff's point about the mlock patch despite the fact that it
> solved a major problem for us with deploying UML in a hosting
> environment. Jeff's proposed new memory management features will give
> us more flexibility than my simple on/off mlock patch, and allows him to
> wash his hands of these grubby management decisions.
>
> cheerio,
>
> --
> Matthew Bloch Bytemark Hosting
> http://www.bytemark-hosting.co.uk/
> phone UK: 0845 004 3 004 US: 1-877 BYTEMAR
> Dedicated Linux hosts from 15ukp ($26) per month
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
> Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
> GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> User-mode-linux-user mailing list
> User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-18 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.59.9.0404091209570.10714@hathi.bw-networx.net>
[not found] ` <185d01c41e23$5996cc00$2000000a@schlepptopp>
2004-04-09 12:47 ` [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] Network lags roland
2004-04-09 16:26 ` Jeff Dike
2004-04-09 18:33 ` [uml-devel] uml responsivenes or "AS vs DEADLINE Scheduler on uml-host" - was: " roland
2004-04-10 12:28 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-04-13 21:26 ` roland
2004-04-14 1:02 ` Henrik Nordstrom
[not found] ` <c58kbu$el1$1@sea.gmane.org>
2004-04-10 14:08 ` [uml-devel] " Jeff Dike
2004-04-10 14:00 ` Sven Köhler
2004-04-10 17:07 ` Jeff Dike
2004-04-10 21:22 ` Sven Köhler
2004-04-10 23:29 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-04-11 3:45 ` attriel
2004-04-15 0:31 ` roland
2004-04-15 12:01 ` David Cannings
[not found] ` <407EADE0.8010308@cox.net>
2004-04-15 21:11 ` roland
2004-04-16 15:12 ` Matthew Bloch
2004-04-18 10:54 ` roland [this message]
2004-04-10 14:50 ` [uml-devel] Re: V=R Michael Koehne
2004-04-11 16:54 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-04-11 17:17 ` Nicholas E. Walker
2004-04-10 15:12 ` [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] Network lags Nicholas E. Walker
2004-04-10 16:46 ` Steven Pritchard
2004-04-10 23:41 ` Henrik Nordstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='004801c42533$94d567b0$2000000a@schlepptopp' \
--to=for_spam@gmx.de \
--cc=matthew@bytemark.co.uk \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox