From: "roland" <for_spam@gmx.de>
To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Johannes Formann <johannes@formann.de>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] process start time in future
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 23:26:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <007501c3b535$79848d10$2000000a@schlepptopp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: a06010201bbec00ce8036@[192.168.1.10]
hi !
also a effect caused by the serveral times reported "clock skew issue"?
maybe it is solved, soon:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=6499133
btw: is jeff the only person doing development or patchmerging/bugfixing most of
the time? is uml primarily a "one man" thing and uml dies, if jeff looses interest
one day? i don`t hope so... but i really wonder anyway, that there is so few traffic
on the mailinglists. is uml still so "exotic" that so few people actually seem to be
interested? maybe everybody has vmware already... ;)
regards
roland
----- Original Message -----
From: "Johannes Formann" <johannes@formann.de>
To: <user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 8:31 PM
Subject: [uml-devel] process start time in future
> Hi,
>
> I've a problem, when I'm running an UML for a few days, the starttime
> of new prozesses are slowly drifting into the future.
>
> I'ven seen that with 2.4.21-6, 2.4.22-5um and 2.4.22-6um.
>
> Can anyone explain/fix it?
>
> An exampel is shown below.
>
> $ ps -f ; date
> UID PID PPID C STIME TTY TIME CMD
> johannes 8967 8966 0 23:54 pts/1 00:00:00 -bash
> johannes 9117 8967 0 Nov28 pts/1 00:00:00 ps -f
> Thu Nov 27 19:27:52 UTC 2003
>
> # ps -f ; date
> UID PID PPID C STIME TTY TIME CMD
> root 5256 5254 0 23:55 pts/0 00:00:00 -bash
> root 5376 5256 0 Nov28 pts/0 00:00:00 ps -f
> Thu Nov 27 19:27:46 UTC 2003
>
>
> Greetings Johannes
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
> help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> _______________________________________________
> User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
> User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-27 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-27 19:31 [uml-devel] process start time in future Johannes Formann
2003-11-27 22:26 ` roland [this message]
2003-11-28 19:42 ` BlaisorBlade
2003-12-01 22:57 ` Henrik Nordstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='007501c3b535$79848d10$2000000a@schlepptopp' \
--to=for_spam@gmx.de \
--cc=johannes@formann.de \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox