linux-um archives
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: uml <uml@dot1q.net>
To: uml-user <user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] SuSE 9.1 host + 2.4.26 Kernel + GCC 3.3.3 similarities to 2.6.6!?
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 17:33:34 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <011001c44c0d$ebdeceb0$dd02a8c0@ferraro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 114001c44bf7$b69ca120$2000000a@schlepptopp

> answering myself:
>
> via google i found:
> >Two different xterms emulators dumping core ... I'd be concerned a
> >wee bit. One note, do not compile with excessive optimizations and
> >especially -fschedule-insns and -fschedule-insns2 is the right way  <-
!!!
> >to produce faulty code with all gcc / egcs releases since 2.8.0     <-
!!!
> >on I86 machines. Not that it would make much sense with a terminal
> >emulator anyway, but even so.
>
> and:
> >linked to the Pentium Pro Blas single processor library.
If -fschedule-insns
> >is included four examples - 06, 07, 09 and 30 fail, 06 and 09 with
segmentation  <-- !!!
> >fault and 09 and 30 with a message that "SCALAR MECHINES SHOULD NOT CALL
JKGNMV".
> >The performance is sometimes better and sometimes worse over the 31
examples, but
> >these are really too small for a proper bennch mark.
>
> and:
> > ..so I guess the problem is not the classic --fschedule-insns bug.
That's the option I found several weeks ago that gave me issues.

> and:
> http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2004-03/msg00032.html
>
> could please someone try putting -fno-schedule-insns (and
maybe -fno-schedule-insns2)
> into the Makefile(s) and try again ?
I'm having issues with at least -fno-schedule-insns -- where in the
arch/um/Makefile do I make the change as well (or do I?)


So I tried the following combos:
perl -e 's/-O2/-O2 -fno-schedule-insns/g' -p -i.bak Makefile
arch/um/Makefile
perl -e 's/-O2/-O2 -fno-schedule-insns2/g' -p -i.bak Makefile
arch/um/Makefile
perl -e 's/-O2/-O2 -fno-schedule-insns -fno-schedule-insns2/g' -p -i.bak
Makefile arch/um/Makefile

No dice on any of them.

I don't believe there is a -O2 in arch/um/Makefile as there is in 2.6.6 -- 
should I make a change to the CFLAGS there?



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X.
From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one
installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and
evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2004-06-06 21:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-06 18:54 [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] SuSE 9.1 host + 2.4.26 Kernel + GCC 3.3.3 similarities to 2.6.6!? roland
2004-06-06 21:33 ` uml [this message]
2004-06-07  3:37   ` uml
2004-06-13 21:58     ` Nix
2004-06-14 19:09       ` BlaisorBlade
2004-06-15  6:20         ` Nix
2004-06-16 19:09           ` BlaisorBlade
2004-06-17 15:35             ` uml
2004-06-17 17:25               ` BlaisorBlade
2004-06-17 18:10                 ` uml
2004-06-17 18:46                   ` BlaisorBlade
2004-06-17 20:00                     ` uml
2004-06-18 19:08                       ` [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] SuSE 9.1 host + 2.4.26 Kernel + GCC 3.3.3 similarities to 2.6.6!? (2.6.7 additionally!) uml
2004-06-17 18:52             ` [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] SuSE 9.1 host + 2.4.26 Kernel + GCC 3.3.3 similarities to 2.6.6!? Nix
     [not found] <007701c44be9$e4d7d630$dd02a8c0@ferraro>
2004-06-06 18:22 ` roland
2004-06-06 20:04   ` uml

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='011001c44c0d$ebdeceb0$dd02a8c0@ferraro' \
    --to=uml@dot1q.net \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox