linux-um archives
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "roland" <for_spam@gmx.de>
To: Henrik Nordstrom <uml@henrik.marasystems.com>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] CVS not updated?
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 00:04:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <03cc01c43c5a$ff8891c0$2000000a@schlepptopp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.LNX.4.44.0405172232390.25764-100000@filer.marasystems.com

> Was not aware of this one.. I was using the SourceForge CVS tree for some
> reason. The www.user-mode-linux.org tree looks MUCH better, in fact in a 
> very good shape.
no wonder - if there are 2 trees and none of it is marked obsolete - quite confusing ;)
what about placing a file "OBSOLETE_PLZ_READ.TXT" in the root of that tree ?
that file could contain a link to the "official" CVS/Bitkeeper/Whatelse uml-trees.

> our local modifications cleanly separated into individual patches and an
> alternate build model based on the official patches instead of CVS which
> probably is a more suitable build model for our production kernels anyway. 
yep.

btw:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=429&atid=100429
could probably need some maintenance. i would like to offer cleaning out obsolete 
entries - but i have no access. jeff - is it possible to get access?

regards
roland


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <uml@henrik.marasystems.com>
To: "roland" <for_spam@gmx.de>
Cc: <user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>; "Jeff Dike" <jdike@addtoit.com>
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 11:14 PM
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] CVS not updated?


> On Mon, 17 May 2004, roland wrote:
> 
> > when i look at:
> > http://www.user-mode-linux.org/cvs/linux/
> > there are log entries "updated to 2.4.26".
> 
> Was not aware of this one.. I was using the SourceForge CVS tree for some
> reason. The www.user-mode-linux.org tree looks MUCH better, in fact in a 
> very good shape.
> 
> Ah, well. All explained and good ;-)
> 
> But there still was something good out of this excercise. We now have all
> our local modifications cleanly separated into individual patches and an
> alternate build model based on the official patches instead of CVS which
> probably is a more suitable build model for our production kernels anyway.  
> But the direct CVS model I have been using up to now is extremely handy
> when working/patching on uml..
> 
> In case someone is interested our UML patch repository can be found at 
> http://marasystems.com/download/uml/. 
> 
> Regards
> Henrik
> 


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband
Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest
6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2004-05-17 21:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-17 15:51 [uml-devel] CVS not updated? Henrik Nordstrom
2004-05-17 17:02 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-05-17 18:59   ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-05-17 20:00     ` roland
2004-05-17 21:14       ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-05-17 22:04         ` roland [this message]
2004-05-17 22:05           ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-05-18 18:02             ` Jeff Dike
2004-05-18 19:42               ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-05-18 22:00                 ` Jeff Dike
2004-05-18 21:38                   ` roland
2004-05-23 11:37                   ` BlaisorBlade
2004-05-23 16:44                     ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-05-24 17:44                       ` BlaisorBlade
2004-05-27 18:21                         ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-05-23 21:44                     ` Jeff Dike
2004-05-28 19:09                       ` BlaisorBlade
2004-05-28 21:33                         ` Jeff Dike

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='03cc01c43c5a$ff8891c0$2000000a@schlepptopp' \
    --to=for_spam@gmx.de \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=uml@henrik.marasystems.com \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox