From: "roland" <for_spam@gmx.de>
To: Henrik Nordstrom <uml@henrik.marasystems.com>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] CVS not updated?
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 00:04:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <03cc01c43c5a$ff8891c0$2000000a@schlepptopp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.LNX.4.44.0405172232390.25764-100000@filer.marasystems.com
> Was not aware of this one.. I was using the SourceForge CVS tree for some
> reason. The www.user-mode-linux.org tree looks MUCH better, in fact in a
> very good shape.
no wonder - if there are 2 trees and none of it is marked obsolete - quite confusing ;)
what about placing a file "OBSOLETE_PLZ_READ.TXT" in the root of that tree ?
that file could contain a link to the "official" CVS/Bitkeeper/Whatelse uml-trees.
> our local modifications cleanly separated into individual patches and an
> alternate build model based on the official patches instead of CVS which
> probably is a more suitable build model for our production kernels anyway.
yep.
btw:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=429&atid=100429
could probably need some maintenance. i would like to offer cleaning out obsolete
entries - but i have no access. jeff - is it possible to get access?
regards
roland
----- Original Message -----
From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <uml@henrik.marasystems.com>
To: "roland" <for_spam@gmx.de>
Cc: <user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>; "Jeff Dike" <jdike@addtoit.com>
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 11:14 PM
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] CVS not updated?
> On Mon, 17 May 2004, roland wrote:
>
> > when i look at:
> > http://www.user-mode-linux.org/cvs/linux/
> > there are log entries "updated to 2.4.26".
>
> Was not aware of this one.. I was using the SourceForge CVS tree for some
> reason. The www.user-mode-linux.org tree looks MUCH better, in fact in a
> very good shape.
>
> Ah, well. All explained and good ;-)
>
> But there still was something good out of this excercise. We now have all
> our local modifications cleanly separated into individual patches and an
> alternate build model based on the official patches instead of CVS which
> probably is a more suitable build model for our production kernels anyway.
> But the direct CVS model I have been using up to now is extremely handy
> when working/patching on uml..
>
> In case someone is interested our UML patch repository can be found at
> http://marasystems.com/download/uml/.
>
> Regards
> Henrik
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband
Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest
6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-17 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-17 15:51 [uml-devel] CVS not updated? Henrik Nordstrom
2004-05-17 17:02 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-05-17 18:59 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-05-17 20:00 ` roland
2004-05-17 21:14 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-05-17 22:04 ` roland [this message]
2004-05-17 22:05 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-05-18 18:02 ` Jeff Dike
2004-05-18 19:42 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-05-18 22:00 ` Jeff Dike
2004-05-18 21:38 ` roland
2004-05-23 11:37 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-05-23 16:44 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-05-24 17:44 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-05-27 18:21 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-05-23 21:44 ` Jeff Dike
2004-05-28 19:09 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-05-28 21:33 ` Jeff Dike
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='03cc01c43c5a$ff8891c0$2000000a@schlepptopp' \
--to=for_spam@gmx.de \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=uml@henrik.marasystems.com \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox