From: "roland" <for_spam@gmx.de>
To: Ali Almahdi <ali@almahdi.cc>,
user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net,
User Mode Linux Devel
<user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] AMD or Intel for host
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 14:56:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <045f01c43ffc$418302f0$2000000a@schlepptopp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 40AF3E70.3000205@almahdi.cc
not easy to tell, if xp 2800+ or P4 2.8 is better for uml
but maybe:
http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/20021001/index.html
helps to find a decision.
this is another comparison i found on the net:
Intel Pentium 4 2.8GHz
SPECint: 1010
SPECfp: 947
AMD Athlon XP 2800+ (2.25GHz)
SPECint: 933
SPECfp: 843
-------------------------
AMD Zone a reçu des résultats sous SPEC CPU 2000 d'un sample du processeur Opteron 2GHz d'AMD :
- SPECint 2000
Opteron 2GHz : 1202
Athlon XP 2800+ nForce 2 : 933
Dell 2.8GHz P4 : 1010
Dell 2.8GHz Xeon : 957
- SPECfp 2000
Opteron 2GHz : 1170
Athlon XP 2800+ nForce 2 : 843
Dell 2.8GHz P4 : 947
Dell 2.8GHz Xeon : 887
-------------------------
don`t know, which is the best benchmark to give an estimate, if uml performs good on that cpu - the P4 seems better.
but - as a compare pricings, the amd gives you much more for the money. it`s much cheaper. (as usual)
regards
roland
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ali Almahdi" <ali@almahdi.cc>
To: <user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net>; "User Mode Linux Devel" <user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 1:50 PM
Subject: [uml-devel] AMD or Intel for host
> Hi all,
>
> I am just asking, which will performe better on the host. AMD Athlon XP
> 2800 or Intel P4 2.8Ghz...??
>
>
> Thanks all in advance,
> //Ali
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
> Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
> Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
> User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-22 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-22 11:50 [uml-devel] AMD or Intel for host Ali Almahdi
2004-05-22 12:56 ` roland [this message]
2004-05-23 9:22 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='045f01c43ffc$418302f0$2000000a@schlepptopp' \
--to=for_spam@gmx.de \
--cc=ali@almahdi.cc \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox