From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=Z_yYkdwzO7TMs7nSMOXR9wn_7BxtKjOKgS5HL@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=e+tM-WTerLmkZfLTQqKCLsJHVBgQ5sj+TMjc4@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1300370936.16880.96.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
	 <AANLkTi=Z_yYkdwzO7TMs7nSMOXR9wn_7BxtKjOKgS5HL@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:31:42 -0400
Message-ID: <1300372302.16880.121.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: um: WARNING: at kernel/futex.c:786 __unqueue_futex
To: richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>
Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, dvhart@linux.intel.com
List-ID: <user-mode-linux-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>

On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 15:27 +0100, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:

> BTW: When using WARN_ON_SMP() the if-statement in __unqueue_futex
> will not longer work.
> 
> WARN_ON_SMP() is defined as "do { } while (0)" on non CONFIG_SMP systems.

Good point. We probably should fix that too.

-- Steve