From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QnfCA-0001J1-OU for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 23:13:18 +0000 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1QnfCA-0005yx-0U for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 23:13:18 +0000 From: David Woodhouse Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 00:13:07 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20110731225801.GD2203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <1312066693.22074.50.camel@i7.infradead.org> <1312066923.22074.53.camel@i7.infradead.org> <1312151063.18010.25.camel@i7.infradead.org> <20110731224834.GC2203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20110731225801.GD2203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <1312153988.18010.39.camel@i7.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 1/5] um: Use __i386__ in ifdef for vsyscall exports, not SUBARCH_i386 To: Al Viro Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnaud Lacombe , "H. Peter Anvin" On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 23:58 +0100, Al Viro wrote: > FWIW, the next step (still not pushed there) is to move arch/um/sys-x86 to > arch/x86/um, with arch/um/os-Linux/sys-x86 becoming arch/x86/um/os-Linux, > Kconfig.x86 moving to arch/x86/um/Kconfig and Makefile-x86 - to > arch/x86/um/Makefile.defs. Next after that - arch/powerpc/um (and yes, > it means resurrected uml/ppc port; for now - only ppc32, since I have no > ppc64 boxen to test on). I can give you an account on a ppc64 box if that would help... What you've done so far, with the one extra patch I just sent, seems perfectly sufficient to make it cope with SUBARCH defaulting to x86 instead of to i386 or x86_64. Are you happy to push it before you do the rest of the refactoring/moving? -- dwmw2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got Input? Slashdot Needs You. Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often. Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek. http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel