From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>,
elicooper@gmx.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"open list:USER-MODE LINUX (UML)"
<user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
linux-x86_64@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: um: PTRACE_SETREGSET failure with XSTATE on Kabylake CPU
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 11:04:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1497981874.22112.20.camel@test-lenovo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <25066617-df15-6d21-713c-1ede1e953448@nod.at>
On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 11:05 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> [adding x86 folks]
>
> Am 20.06.2017 um 10:49 schrieb Thomas Meyer:
> >
> > In UML the first userspace ptrace always fails, so init get's killed.
> >
> > The check "count < fpu_user_xstate_size" was introduced by commit:
> >
> > commit 91c3dba7dbc199191272f4a9863f86ea3bfd679f
> > Author: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
> > Date: Fri Jun 17 13:07:17 2016 -0700
> >
> > x86/fpu/xstate: Fix PTRACE frames for XSAVES
> >
> > XSAVES uses compacted format and is a kernel instruction. The kernel
> > should use standard-format, non-supervisor state data for PTRACE.
> >
> > So to summarize:
> >
> > - PTRACE_GETREGSET with NT_X86_XSTATE gets 832 and return 832, with no
> > error.
> >
> > - PTRACE_SETREGSET get 832 (sizeof struct _xstate) but wants at least
> > 1088, otherwise it will fail with -EFAULT (why not -EINVAL?)
> >
> > Ideas?
We considered allowing a partial XSAVE buffer for PTRACE_SETREGSET, but
it was that the XSAVE instruction requires a full-size buffer led to
this choice. Using a smaller buffer for XSAVE causes a fault.
Yu-cheng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-20 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-20 1:56 um: PTRACE_SETREGSET failure with XSTATE on Kabylake CPU Thomas Meyer
2017-06-20 6:58 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-06-20 8:49 ` [uml-devel] " Thomas Meyer
2017-06-20 9:05 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-06-20 18:04 ` Yu-cheng Yu [this message]
2017-06-20 18:17 ` [uml-devel] " Richard Weinberger
2017-06-20 18:59 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-06-20 19:53 ` Yu-cheng Yu
2017-06-20 20:13 ` [uml-devel] " Thomas Meyer
2017-06-21 8:39 ` Natale Patriciello
2017-06-21 9:44 ` Thomas Meyer
2017-06-21 12:47 ` Richard Weinberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1497981874.22112.20.camel@test-lenovo \
--to=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=elicooper@gmx.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-x86_64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=thomas@m3y3r.de \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox