linux-um.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "NeilBrown" <neil@brown.name>
To: "Al Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	"Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>, "David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	"Marc Dionne" <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
	"Xiubo Li" <xiubli@redhat.com>,
	"Ilya Dryomov" <idryomov@gmail.com>,
	"Tyler Hicks" <code@tyhicks.com>,
	"Miklos Szeredi" <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
	"Anton Ivanov" <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
	"Johannes Berg" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	"Trond Myklebust" <trondmy@kernel.org>,
	"Anna Schumaker" <anna@kernel.org>,
	"Chuck Lever" <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	"Jeff Layton" <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	"Amir Goldstein" <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	"Steve French" <sfrench@samba.org>,
	"Namjae Jeon" <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
	"Carlos Maiolino" <cem@kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org,
	netfs@lists.linux.dev, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] VFS: add dentry_lookup_killable()
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 17:50:16 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <175507141618.2234665.4849620982329749562@noble.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250813041506.GZ222315@ZenIV>

On Wed, 13 Aug 2025, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 12:25:06PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> > btrfs/ioctl.c uses a "killable" lock on the directory when creating an
> > destroying subvols.  overlayfs also does this.
> > 
> > This patch adds dentry_lookup_killable() for these users.
> > 
> > Possibly all dentry_lookup should be killable as there is no down-side,
> > but that can come in a later patch.
> 
> Same objections re lookup_flags and it would be better to do that
> at the same point where you convert the (btrfs and overlayfs?) callers.
> 

I had trouble deciding whether it would be better to merge the patches
for easy review, or keep them separate in case they needed to go through
different trees.. I guess I decided wrongly.

NeiBrown


  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-13 10:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-12  2:25 [PATCH 00/11] VFS: prepare for changes to directory locking NeilBrown
2025-08-12  2:25 ` [PATCH 01/11] VFS: discard err2 in filename_create() NeilBrown
2025-08-13  3:22   ` Al Viro
2025-08-12  2:25 ` [PATCH 02/11] VFS: introduce dentry_lookup() and friends NeilBrown
2025-08-13  4:12   ` Al Viro
2025-08-13  7:48     ` NeilBrown
2025-08-12  2:25 ` [PATCH 03/11] VFS: add dentry_lookup_killable() NeilBrown
2025-08-13  4:15   ` Al Viro
2025-08-13  7:50     ` NeilBrown [this message]
2025-08-12  2:25 ` [PATCH 04/11] VFS: introduce dentry_lookup_continue() NeilBrown
2025-08-13  4:22   ` Al Viro
2025-08-13  7:53     ` NeilBrown
2025-08-18 12:39   ` Amir Goldstein
2025-08-18 21:52     ` NeilBrown
2025-08-19  8:37       ` Amir Goldstein
2025-08-12  2:25 ` [PATCH 05/11] VFS: add rename_lookup() NeilBrown
2025-08-13  4:35   ` Al Viro
2025-08-13  8:04     ` NeilBrown
2025-08-14  1:40       ` Al Viro
2025-08-12  2:25 ` [PATCH 06/11] VFS: unify old_mnt_idmap and new_mnt_idmap in renamedata NeilBrown
2025-08-13  4:36   ` Al Viro
2025-08-12  2:25 ` [PATCH 07/11] VFS: Change vfs_mkdir() to unlock on failure NeilBrown
2025-08-13  7:22   ` Amir Goldstein
2025-08-14  1:13     ` NeilBrown
2025-08-14 13:29       ` Amir Goldstein
2025-08-12  2:25 ` [PATCH 08/11] VFS: allow d_splice_alias() and d_add() to work on hashed dentries NeilBrown
2025-08-13  5:07   ` Al Viro
2025-08-12  2:25 ` [PATCH 09/11] VFS: use global wait-queue table for d_alloc_parallel() NeilBrown
2025-08-13  6:44   ` Al Viro
2025-08-14  1:31     ` NeilBrown
2025-08-12  2:25 ` [PATCH 10/11] VFS: use d_alloc_parallel() in lookup_one_qstr_excl() NeilBrown
2025-08-13  5:19   ` Al Viro
2025-08-14  0:56     ` NeilBrown
2025-08-12  2:25 ` [PATCH 11/11] VFS: introduce d_alloc_noblock() and d_alloc_locked() NeilBrown
2025-08-13  6:53   ` Al Viro
2025-08-14  2:07     ` NeilBrown
2025-08-14 13:47       ` Amir Goldstein
2025-08-13  0:01 ` [PATCH 00/11] VFS: prepare for changes to directory locking Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=175507141618.2234665.4849620982329749562@noble.neil.brown.name \
    --to=neil@brown.name \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=anna@kernel.org \
    --cc=anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=code@tyhicks.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=sfrench@samba.org \
    --cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=xiubli@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).