From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-um@lists.infradead.org, dwalter@google.com,
anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] ubd: remove use of blk_rq_map_sg
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 22:42:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1771273.Wvapsmo5cm@blindfold> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20263939.GgfHUqOn1T@blindfold>
Am Montag, 15. Oktober 2018, 21:17:46 CEST schrieb Richard Weinberger:
> Am Montag, 15. Oktober 2018, 10:45:41 CEST schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
> > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:40:06AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > > hm, this breaks UML.
> > > Every filesystem fails to mount.
> > >
> > > I did some very rough tests, it seems that the driver fails to read
> > > data correctly as soon the upper layer tries to get more than 4096 bytes
> > > at once out of the block device.
> > >
> > > IOW:
> > > dd if=/dev/ubda bs=4096 count=1 skip=0 2>/dev/null| md5sum -
> > > is good.
> > > As soon I set bs to something greater it returns garbage.
> > >
> > > Later this day I might have some cycles left to debug further.
> >
> > It probably needs this on top:
>
> Sadly not. I'm checking now what exactly is broken.
I take this back. Christoph's fixup makes reading work.
The previous version corrupted my test block device in interesting ways
and confused all tests.
But the removal of blk_rq_map_sg() still has issues.
Now the device blocks endless upon flush.
:/ # cat /proc/251/stack
[<0>] __switch_to+0x56/0x85
[<0>] __schedule+0x427/0x472
[<0>] schedule+0x7c/0x95
[<0>] schedule_timeout+0x2b/0x1d2
[<0>] io_schedule_timeout+0x2b/0x48
[<0>] wait_for_common_io.constprop.2+0xdd/0x154
[<0>] wait_for_completion_io+0x1a/0x1c
[<0>] submit_bio_wait+0x5b/0x74
[<0>] blkdev_issue_flush+0x95/0xc3
[<0>] jbd2_journal_recover+0xe4/0xf6
[<0>] jbd2_journal_load+0x183/0x3b2
[<0>] ext4_fill_super+0x23e0/0x3602
[<0>] mount_bdev+0x18f/0x1f8
[<0>] ext4_mount+0x1a/0x1c
[<0>] mount_fs+0x13/0xf6
[<0>] vfs_kern_mount+0x78/0x139
[<0>] do_mount+0x874/0xb48
[<0>] ksys_mount+0x99/0xc0
[<0>] sys_mount+0x10/0x14
[<0>] handle_syscall+0x79/0xa7
[<0>] userspace+0x487/0x514
[<0>] fork_handler+0x94/0x96
[<0>] 0xffffffffffffffff
Just checked, the number of calls to blk_mq_start_request()
matches the number of calls to __blk_mq_end_request().
So I don't really get what is being waited on.
Thanks,
//richard
_______________________________________________
linux-um mailing list
linux-um@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-15 20:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-15 6:56 [PATCH, RFC] ubd: remove use of blk_rq_map_sg Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-15 8:40 ` Richard Weinberger
2018-10-15 8:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-15 19:17 ` Richard Weinberger
2018-10-15 20:42 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2018-10-15 20:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-15 21:46 ` Richard Weinberger
2018-10-15 22:04 ` Jens Axboe
2018-10-15 22:44 ` Richard Weinberger
2018-10-16 2:19 ` Jens Axboe
2018-10-16 8:38 ` Richard Weinberger
2018-10-16 14:26 ` Jens Axboe
2018-10-17 6:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-18 21:04 ` Richard Weinberger
2018-10-15 8:46 ` Anton Ivanov
2018-10-16 22:43 ` Richard Weinberger
2018-10-17 6:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1771273.Wvapsmo5cm@blindfold \
--to=richard@nod.at \
--cc=anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dwalter@google.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).