From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 19uPuO-0000qt-00 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 22:10:20 -0700 Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.4.60]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 19uPtk-0006dg-9g for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 22:09:40 -0700 Received: from 216-15-124-77.c3-0.smr-ubr3.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([216.15.124.77] helo=mizar.alcor.net) by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #4) id 19uPti-0002yW-00 for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 03 Sep 2003 01:09:38 -0400 Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19uPth-0000HB-00 for ; Wed, 03 Sep 2003 01:09:37 -0400 From: Matt Zimmerman Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] Make UML slightly quieter Message-ID: <20030903050937.GG25655@alcor.net> References: <20030901204045.GA17884@alcor.net> <200309021849.h82InoHx001633@ccure.karaya.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200309021849.h82InoHx001633@ccure.karaya.com> Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 01:09:37 -0400 To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 02:49:50PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > mdz@debian.org said: > > When booting UML with the 'quiet' option, most kernel messages are > > suppressed, but the skas3 and /proc/mm check messages are still > > displayed. Using printk rather than printf lets them be suppressed in > > the normal way, and didn't break anything for me. > > The problem with this is that if UML dies early and doesn't make it into the > kernel proper, printk messages will never be seen, and those messages > potentially have debugging usefulness. > > We can possibly make everyone happy by replacing those printfs with a > uml_printf that respects the -quiet switch. Easy enough. Is there an existing module which has stuff like this, where such a function would fit? -- - mdz ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel