From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 19x46C-0005nZ-00 for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 05:29:28 -0700 Received: from mout1.freenet.de ([194.97.50.132]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 19x46C-0001Iw-Cf for User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 05:29:28 -0700 Received: from [194.97.55.148] (helo=mx5.freenet.de) by mout1.freenet.de with asmtp (Exim 4.22) id 19x468-0000YY-Jp for User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:29:24 +0200 Received: from b2a62.pppool.de ([213.7.42.98] helo=home.petschge.de) by mx5.freenet.de with esmtp (Exim 4.22 #1) id 19x467-0003Hd-D4 for User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:29:24 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost.petschge.de [127.0.0.1]) by home.petschge.de (Postfix on Linux (i386)) with ESMTP id C5C043BCE5 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 18:28:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mars (localhost.petschge.de [127.0.0.1]) by home.petschge.de (Postfix on Linux (i386)) with SMTP id 587F63BCE4 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 18:28:51 +0200 (CEST) From: "Patrick \"Petschge\" Kilian" Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Re: 2.6.0 uptime bug References: <200309041706.03045.petschge@gmx.de> <20030905151952.6EBFC3BCE4@home.petschge.de> <20030906190708.56B8C3BCE4@home.petschge.de> <200309091616.h89GG72J003645@ccure.karaya.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Message-Id: <20030909162851.587F63BCE4@home.petschge.de> Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 18:28:51 +0200 To: User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Hi, >> I have a patch which gives the correct uptime. I don't know what the >> patch breaks so please post any problems you have. > Have you been able to figure out whether this is also a problem for other > ports? Your patch suggests that it is, and if it is, then you should send > it to LKML so it can be fixed in mainline. I don't know if other arch beside uml give the wrong uptime. If anyone could check this on i386 or other "read" hardware I'd be glad to hear the result. Looking at the code and the callpath all arch should have this bug. If someone is able to confirm this I'm going to post the patch to the lkml. mfg, Patrick "Petschge" Kilian -- Spam ist weniger ein technisches als ein soziales Problem. Die einzigen technischen Mittel, die soziale Probleme halbwegs brauchbar loesen, sind schwere Waffen. Und das auch nur bei wirklich konsequenter Anwendung. -- Alexander Schreiber in dasr ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel